SafeBoosC III Two-year Follow-up

April 8, 2024 updated by: Gorm Greisen

Cerebral Near-infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring Versus Treatment as Usual for Extremely Preterm Infants: a Protocol for the Follow-up Study for the SafeBoosC-III Trial

The SafeBoosC-III 2 year follow up study will follow up on all patients randomised in the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial (NCT03770741). The investigators will collect data when the patients are two years of corrected age from routine standardised follow up assessments, parental questionnaires as well as informal assessments. The study will commence in September 2021, and will expect to include all 72 sites across 18 countries, which take part of the SafeBoosC-III clinical trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the SafeBoosC-III trial, the objective is to investigate the effect of treatment based on cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring of brain oxygenation compared with treatment as usual in extremely preterm infants. The primary outcome of the trial is death or survival with severe brain injury at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Despite an association between severe brain injury diagnosed in the neonatal period and later neurodevelopmental disability, this relationship is not always strong. Therefore, if treatment based on cerebral NIRS monitoring decreases the risks of death or survival with severe brain injury, it is important to document if the beneficial effect persists into early childhood, in the form of better neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore, it is also important to identify evidence of unexpected harms. It would be unfortunate if cerebral NIRS monitoring became standard practice without good evidence that long-term patient-relevant benefits outweigh possible harms. As the SafeBoosC-III trial intends to randomise 1600 infants, there is potential to achieve sufficient power for a meaningful assessment of the experimental intervention's effect on long-term neurodevelopment, as well as an evaluation of unexpected harms. The objective of the SafeBoosC III follow-up study is to investigate the benefits and harms of treatment guided by cerebral NIRS monitoring of brain oxygenation in extremely preterm infants during the first 72 hours of life, assessed at two years' corrected age. The hypothesis is that the intervention will decrease a composite of death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability at two years' corrected age, and/or increase cognitive function in survivors assessed by the Bayley III/IV test, with insignificant harms. The investigators aim to collect data on as many children as possible and will do this by collecting clinical data from health care records as well as answers from parental questionnaires.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Righospitalet (The University Hospital, Copenhagen)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Infants born below 28 weeks of gestation and randomised in the SafeBoosC-III trial

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participation in the SafeBoosC-III trial and enrollment in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) taking part in the follow-up study, with parental consent according to local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

Parental objection to the use of their child's data in the follow-up study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death or moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability
Time Frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
A child will be classified with moderate-or-severe neurodevelopmental disability if they have been diagnosed with cerebral palsy, a cognitive function score below -2 standard deviations from the norm, hearing impairment, or vision impairment or from data from a parental questionnaire.
To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Mean Bayley III/IV cognitive score
Time Frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
The cognitive scores from the Bayley III/IV assessment will constitute a single continuous outcome measure (higher scores meaning better outcomes)
To be assessed at two years of corrected age

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily medication the last two months (yes/no)
Time Frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Will be assessed based on the childs health care records or a parental questionnaire
To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Any other chronic illness (defined as any problem which has been diagnosed by a doctor and which 1) is expected to last more than a few months, 2) causes problems in everyday life, or 3) is a risk of early death or disability),
Time Frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Will be assessed based on the childs health care records or a parental questionnaire
To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Growth measurements
Time Frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Mean head circumference, mean height and mean body weight. Will be assessed based on the childs health care records
To be assessed at two years of corrected age
Components of the co-primary outcomes
Time Frame: To be assessed at two years of corrected age
All components of the co-primary outcomes will be reported for the two groups separately as well as effect estimates with confidence intervals and will be taken into consideration when interpreting the main results
To be assessed at two years of corrected age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Damage

Clinical Trials on Treatment as usual + cerebral oximetry monitoring the first 72 hours of life

3
Subscribe