- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06214364
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gamified Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Function in Pediatric Brain Damage
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as Adjuvant to Gamified Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Function in Pediatric Non-progressive Brain Damage: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to acknowledge the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjuvant with gaming rehabilitation for upper limb function rehabilitation in paediatric population with non-progressive brain damage. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does tDCS boost upper limb function rehabilitation results adding as an adjuvant in paediatric brain damage?
- What domains related with upper limb function are most influenced by tDCS stimulation?
- What clinical variables are the best to predict the efficacy of the combined treatment?
- If the selected intervention causes changes in cognitive domains, and, if it occurs, see their relationship with the proposed intervention and the motor outcomes.
As a general objective, this trial seeks the validation of a protocol of non-invasive brain stimulation with tDCS as a complementary therapy for peadiatric population with brain injuries.
Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: experimental group will receive anodal tDCS plus upper limb rehabilitation gaming system rehabilitation and control group will receive sham tDCS plus rehabilitation gaming system for upper limb rehabilitation. Both groups will conducted a virtual reality program with upper limb exercises while been stimulated either with anodal tDCS or sham tDCS.
Researchers will compare experimental and control groups to see if there is a difference in upper limb function and cognitive functions.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Juan Pablo Romero Muñoz, PhD, MD
- Phone Number: +34 91 409 09 03
- Email: p.romero.prof@ufv.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marcos Ríos Lago, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 91 409 09 03
- Email: mrios@psi.uned.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28007
- Beata Maria Ana Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
- Traumatic brain injury.
- Cerebral palsy.
- Acquired Brain Injury.
- Other causes of non-progressive brain damage susceptible to treatment with the established procedures.
- Evolution of the injury of at least one year.
- Age between 7 and 15 years, with adequate language development and capacity to comprehend the proposed procedure.
- Neuroimaging study done.
- Absence of previous brain injuries prior to the one prompting treatment.
- Score between II and IV on the MACS scale for manual ability assessment.
- Signed informed consent by the patient and their legal guardian in case the participant is 12 or older. If the participant is younger than 12 years, only the caregiver signed informed consent will be necessary.
- Increased tone according to the modified Ashworth scale ranging from 1 to 1+.
- Minimum score of 1 on each item assessed in the Melbourne Assessment 2 scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dermatological problems in the electrode application area (psoriasis, dermatitis on the scalp or face).
- Presence of implants or metal pieces in the head excluding fillings.
- Pacemakers, medication pumps, stimulators (vagal, cerebral, transcutaneous), ventriculoperitoneal shunts, or aneurysm clips.
- Neurological disease different from that described in the inclusion criteria.
- Significant language difficulties that unable proper understanding of activities or severely limit expression.
- Moderate or severe mood disorders diagnosed by the regular pediatrician.
- Uncontrolled medical issues (acute phase pathologies without medical or pharmacological treatment with proven efficacy or life-threatening conditions).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Active transcranial direct current stimulation
Active Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex of the affected or most affected hemisphere during 10 20 minute-sessions at 2 miliamps. The tDCS stimulator device will be used by an experienced physical therapist by a saline-soak pair of surface electrodes. The anode electrode will be placed over C3 (EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp2), in order to enhance the excitability of M1. While the tDCS stimulation is administered, virtual reality upper limb exercises will be conducted. Virtual reality program will continue for another 20 minutes after the tDCS stimulation. |
Active Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex of the affected or most affected hemisphere during 10 20 minute-sessions at 2 miliamps. The tDCS stimulator device will be used by an experienced physical therapist by a saline-soak pair of surface electrodes. The anode electrode will be placed over C3 (EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp2), in order to enhance the excitability of M1. While the tDCS stimulation is administered, virtual reality upper limb exercises will be conducted. Virtual reality program will continue for another 20 minutes after the tDCS stimulation. |
Sham Comparator: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sham Transcranial Direct Current (s-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes. The electrodes will be placed in the same positioned as for M1 stimulation in the experimental group, but the current will only be applied ramping for 30 seconds in the beginning and at the end of the procedure to secure the blinding. While the sham tDCS stimulation is administered, virtual reality upper limb exercises will be conducted. Virtual reality program will continue for another 20 minutes after the sham tDCS stimulation. |
The electrodes will be placed in the same position as for the Primary Motor Cortex stimulation, as in the experimental group. Current will be applied for 30 seconds in the beginning and at the end for securing the blinding. While the sham tDCS stimulation is administered virtual reality upper limb exercises will be conducted. Virtual reality program will continue for another 20 minutes after the tDCS stimulation. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA-2)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Upper limb functionality scale for children with neurological impairment from 2,5 to 15 years.
It evaluates range of movement, target accuracy, fluency, grasp, accuracy of release, finger dexterity and speed.
These elements are scored separately based on the execution of 16 different activities, giving a 0 to 4 or 0 to 3 punctuation in 36 different items.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in kinematic and kinetic upper limb analysis - Velocity of the movement
Time Frame: From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
The activities included in the MA-2 will be recorded with three different cameras: one in the frontal plane, another in the sagittal plane, and another for the transverse plane. Movement analysis will be carried out with the software kinovea (Kinovea, France). The analysis will include mean and peak velocity of the movement, addressed in meters per second (m/s). |
From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in kinematic and kinetic upper limb analysis - Movement acceleration
Time Frame: From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
The activities included in the MA-2 will be recorded with three different cameras: one in the frontal plane, another in the sagittal plane, and another for the transverse plane. Movement analysis will be carried out with the software kinovea (Kinovea, France). The analysis will include movement acceleration, addressed in meters per second squared (m/s^2). |
From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in kinematic and kinetic upper limb analysis - Duration of the movement
Time Frame: From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
The activities included in the MA-2 will be recorded with three different cameras: one in the frontal plane, another in the sagittal plane, and another for the transverse plane.
Movement analysis will be carried out with the software kinovea (Kinovea, France).
The time parameters included in the analyses will be: going phase, adjusting phase, returning phase and total movement duration.
All measures will be addressed in seconds (s).
|
From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in kinematic and kinetic upper limb analysis - range of motion
Time Frame: From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
The activities included in the MA-2 will be recorded with three different cameras: one in the frontal plane, another in the sagittal plane, and another for the transverse plane. Movement analysis will be carried out with the software kinovea (Kinovea, France). The analysis will include range of motion of flex-extension of shoulder, elbow and wrist; horizontal abduction of the shoulder, radial and cubital deviation of the wrist and abduction and adduction of the shoulder. The markers needed to register the movement will be place according to Wu et al. protocol in sternocostoclavicular joints and xiphoid process for the trunk, acromioclavicular joint for the shoulder, medial and lateral epicondyles for the elbow, radial and ulnar styloid processes for the wrist and heads of the second and fourth metacarpals for the hand. These measures will be addressed in degrees. |
From Baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Box and Block Test (BBT)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
This test assesses dexterity.
It consists of placing the greater number of cubes from one place to another in 60 seconds.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes in and grip strength
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Hand grip strength will be evaluated with a dynamometer
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in finger flexor muscles spasticity
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Finger flexor muscle groups spasticity will be evaluated by AMADEO device (Tyromotion, Graz).
The device assesses spasticity in the flexor muscle groups of the fingers based on the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), taking 3 measurements at 3 different speeds.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in finger extensor muscles spasticity
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Finger extensor muscle groups spasticity will be evaluated by AMADEO device (Tyromotion, Graz).
The device assesses spasticity in the extensor muscle groups of the fingers based on the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), taking 3 measurements at 3 different speeds.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Children's hand-use experience questionnaire (CHEQ)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Measures Upper limb use in daily living activities and its subjective experience using the affected hand in activities where usually two hands are needed.
This questionnaire can be answered by the children or the caregivers.
It has 3 categories: hand use, time needed to complete the action in comparison with their equals and personal experience while conducting the action.
It includes 27 different activities.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children V (WISC-V)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Clinical instrument to assess intelligence in children from 6 to 16 years and 11 months.
It provides scores of primary intelligence indices that reflect intellectual functioning in different cognitive areas: verbal comprehension, visuospatial ability, fluid reasoning, working memory, and processing speed.
It also provides an overall intelligence score.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
This tool is a visual perception test which consists of a sequence of geometric figures, in ascending grade of complexity, to evaluate the visuomotor integration in individuals from 3 years to 17 years and 11 months old.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Neuropsychological battery for children NEPSY-II
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
It is a tool for conducting specific cognitive assessment by domains, from 3 to 16 years old, as it includes tests that assess attention and executive functions, language, memory and learning, sensorimotor functioning, visuospatial processing, and social perception.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch) Changes in Test for everyday attention for children (TEA-Ch)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
This test evaluates the different types of attention (selective, divided and sustained) in visual and auditive modality for children between 6 and 12 years.
It is composed of 9 subtests.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Verbal learning test for children Spain-Complutense (TAVECI)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
This test is designed for evaluating memory and learning system in children between 3 and 16 years of age.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Behavior rating inventory for executive function 2 (BRIEF-2)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
This is the international reference tool for assessing executive functioning for children between 5 and 18 years.
It is reported from the parents, caregivers and teachers by questionnaires.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Evaluation System for children and adolescents (SENA)
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
This tool assesses a wide spectrum of emotional and conduct problems for children from 3 years to 18 through information of their environment.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Changes in Kidscreen-52 scale
Time Frame: From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
It is a quality of life questionnaire that is completed both by the children and by their parents or caregivers.
It includes several domains about situations and functions of the daily living, answering the questions with a punctuation from 1 to 5. The final score is obtained by summing each value: higher values correlate with a good quality of life perception and lower punctuations correlate with a poor quality of life perception.
|
From baseline at 2 weeks and 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Juan Pablo Romero Muñoz, PhD, MD, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
- Principal Investigator: Marcos Ríos Lago, PhD, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
- Principal Investigator: Beatriz Gavilán Agustí, PhD, Hospital Beata María Ana
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
- Moura RCF, Santos C, Collange Grecco L, Albertini G, Cimolin V, Galli M, Oliveira C. Effects of a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb movements in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017 Aug;20(6):368-375. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2017.1282050. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
- Upadhyay J, Tiwari N, Ansari MN. Cerebral palsy: Aetiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2020 Dec;47(12):1891-1901. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13379. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
- Araki T, Yokota H, Morita A. Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Characteristic Features, Diagnosis, and Management. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017 Feb 15;57(2):82-93. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0191. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Gmelig Meyling C, Verschuren O, Rentinck IR, Engelbert RHH, Gorter JW. Physical rehabilitation interventions in children with acquired brain injury: a scoping review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Jan;64(1):40-48. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14997. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
- Khan F, Amatya B, Galea MP, Gonzenbach R, Kesselring J. Neurorehabilitation: applied neuroplasticity. J Neurol. 2017 Mar;264(3):603-615. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8307-9. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
- Choi JY, Yi SH, Ao L, Tang X, Xu X, Shim D, Yoo B, Park ES, Rha DW. Virtual reality rehabilitation in children with brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Apr;63(4):480-487. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14762. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
- Ko EJ, Hong MJ, Choi EJ, Yuk JS, Yum MS, Sung IY. Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Cognitive Training for Improving Cognition and Language Among Children With Cerebral Palsy With Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, and Clinical Trial. Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 25;9:713792. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.713792. eCollection 2021.
- Collange-Grecco LA, Cosmo C, Silva ALS, Rizzutti S, Oliveira CS, Muszkat M. Effects of Dual Task Training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2023 Jul;26(5):279-286. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2023.2228400. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHILDBOOST
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
-
Northwestern UniversityActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy | Bilateral Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues...RecruitingCerebral Palsy, Dyskinetic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Infantile Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyFrance
-
St Mary's University CollegeUniversity of GloucestershireUnknownCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy Ataxic | Cerebral Palsy, MixedUnited Kingdom
-
Hilde FeysHasselt University; ETH Zurich; Curtin UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, SpasticBelgium
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingDystonic Cerebral Palsy | Dyskinetic Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
MTI UniversityEnrolling by invitationSpastic Diplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
East Carolina UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Remote Ischemic ConditioningUnited States
-
October 6 UniversityCompletedSpastic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
Marmara UniversityUnknownCerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, DiplegicTurkey
Clinical Trials on Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
Louisiana State University and A&M CollegeNot yet recruitingParkinson Disease
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalRecruitingStroke | Traumatic Brain Injury | Acquired Brain Injury | HemiparesisCanada
-
University of LiegeResearch Center of Neurology, Russia; Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Italy; Université... and other collaboratorsCompletedDisorder of ConsciousnessBelgium
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanRecruiting
-
Universidad Francisco de VitoriaUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos; Hospital Beata María AnaCompletedPain | Parkinson DiseaseSpain
-
Federal University of São PauloUniversity of Pittsburgh; Universidade Federal do AmapáCompleted
-
D'Or Institute for Research and EducationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.; Conselho Nacional... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneNot yet recruiting
-
Manhattan Psychiatric CenterCompletedSchizophrenia | Auditory HallucinationUnited States
-
ElsanRecruitingCancer Pain | Refractory PainFrance