Embolic Signals Detection Study (Esds) in Candidates for Surgical Carotid Revascularisation

November 14, 2021 updated by: Ginevra Pizzarelli, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena

Embolic Signals Detection Study (Esds) in Candidates for Surgical Carotid Revascularisation: a Comparison With Plaque Histological Findings

About 20% of strokes are caused by emboli deriving from a carotid plaque. In symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis grater than 70% the Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) reduces stroke risk by about 75% and is generally accepted as being cost effective. However also in these cases there is a part of the population that, according to the morphological plaque characteristics, could better benefit from a conservative medical treatment.

Improving the Best Medical Treatment, the situation seems to be even less clear in asymptomatic patients, where probably it would need to treat at least 32 patients in order to prevent one single ictus.

Different parameters have been considered in order to determine, among the asymptomatic patients the ones that more than others could benefit from a surgical revascularisation instead of a medical treatment.

Between these parameters, the quality of the plaque (vulnerability) and the micro-embolic signals (MES) detection with the Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Holter seems to be the most relevant.

Another interesting aspect is trying to establish whether plaques can determine a different embolic risk in relation to the different histological findings.

Therefore, it seems interesting and reasonable trying to establish a correlation between these two parameters in asymptomatic patients as in the symptomatic ones in order to make more and more appropriate a surgical plaque removal according to the specific risk of each patient in a set of tailored surgery.

It consists in a descriptive observational study, since it intends to describe the embolic signals detection (MES) counted in automatic way with the TCD Holter, in patients affected by carotid stenosis, before and after the surgical operation.

In particular it consists in a monocentric, longitudinal, prospective cohort study since it intends to analyse a group of patients (already candidates to CEA) that experiences a specific event (MES) before and after the surgical plaque removal, in a precise span of time.

Since the treatment, removing the plaque, should remove the embolic focus too, a significant reduction of microembolic signals in post-operative time is expected.

This reduction has been esteemed around about the 70% among candidates to CEA. Patients taken on responsibility of the equipe will undergo an ultrasonographic investigation for the carotid stenosis, histological characterization of the plaque based on the Gray-Weale classification and TCD-Holter for MES.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Modena, Italy, 41126
        • OCB Baggiovara, AOU Modena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We selected patients already got in touch with the hospital, already put in list for a carotid surgical revascularization.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent signed
  • Age>18y.o.
  • Carotid stenosis >70% and/or vulnerable plaque

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give the informed consent
  • Age<18y.o.
  • Carotid stenosis < 70 %
  • Patients already treated with CEA in the same seat
  • Impossibility to find the insonation window
  • Patients not in best medical treatment therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MES COUNT
Time Frame: before surgery
number of MES
before surgery
MES COUNT
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
number of MES
24 hours after surgery
MES COUNT
Time Frame: after 30 days from the surgery
number of MES
after 30 days from the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RISK RATE
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 60 days
Estimate an association between MES count and plaque's histology
through study completion, an average of 60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberto Moratto, Dr, AOU Modena e Reggio Emilia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

3
Subscribe