Positive End Espiratory Pressure Trial in Coronavirus Disease 19 Treated With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

January 4, 2022 updated by: Giorgio Bosso, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital

Lung Ultrasound-Guided PEEP Titration Versus Standard Protocol in Patients With COVID-19 ARDS Treated With CPAP: a Single Center Prospective Trial

Consecutive patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, CT evidence of bilateral pneumonia and diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) with molecular nasopharyngeal swab consecutively admitted to the COVID Care Unit of the "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital were enrolled. All the patients with clinical indication for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) were randomized 1:1 into two groups: Group A received a fixed Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 10 centimetre of water (cmH2O), Group B underwent the PEEP trial to identify the optimal PEEP (defined as the highest value that preceded the appearance of the "lung pulse" at lung ultrasound and that determined an increase in PaO2/FiO2 by at least 20%). Primary endpoint was defined as a composite in-hospital mortality+intubation, secondary endpoint was the improvement of PaO2/FiO2. As safety indicator, the incidence of pneumothorax was collected.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Consecutive COVID-19 patients affected by Acute Respiratory Syndrome (ARDS) admitted to COVID Care Unit of "Santa Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, Pozzuoli (Naples, Italy), were prospectively enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years, diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection confirmed by means of a nucleic acid test by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on specimen from nasopharyngeal swab, bilateral interstitial pneumonia at CT scan; hypoxemic respiratory failure defined as PaO2 (partial pressure of oxygen) to FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) ratio < 200.

As exclusion criteria were considered: type 2 respiratory failure; hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors and/or inotropes support; CT evidence of pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum; concomitant acute medical disease (stroke; myocardial infarction; septic shock; gastrointestinal bleeding; acute renal failure requiring dialysis) who could affect the prognosis independent from COVID - 19.

All the patients enrolled underwent clinical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, arterial blood gas analysis, lung ultrasound, chest CT. During the hospital stay, the patients were treated according to the standard and experimental protocol available; therapies administered, and collateral effects were collected.

All participants gave their written informed consent. All the patients eligible to receive CPAP were consecutively 1:1 randomized to PEEP trial (Group A) or standard treatment (Group B).

In the Group A, PEEP was increased from 5 to 7.5 and 10 cmH20 in 30-minute steps during which lung ultrasound and blood gas analyses were repeated. PEEP responsiveness was evaluated comparing ultrasound findings and arterial blood gas parameters during oxygen supplementation with helmet-CPAP at different PEEP levels (5, 7.5 and 10, respectively), maintaining the same FiO2. A PEEP-responder is defined as a subject with clinical and/or arterial blood gases improvement with helmet-CPAP without signs of lung hyperinflation. The best PEEP was defined as the PEEP value before the appearance of lung pulse and with a PaO2/FiO2 levels stable or major than 20% in comparison to the basal value. In the Standard practice group CPAP was set at 10 cmH2O for all patients and a blood gas analysis was performed after 2 hours.

Endotracheal intubation was considered in presence of impaired respiratory mechanics, worsening of respiratory acidosis, decreased mental status.

Primary outcome was defined by a composite of hospital mortality and need of endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcome was considered the effect of CPAP on PaO2/FiO2 and respiratory rate. As a safety indicator the incidence of pneumothorax was considered.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Naples
      • Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy, 80078
        • COVID CARE UNIT Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years;
  • diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by means of RT-PCR on specimen from nasopharyngeal swab;
  • bilateral interstitial pneumonia at CT scan;
  • hypoxemic respiratory failure defined as PaO2/FiO2 < 200 at blood gas analyses.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • type 2 respiratory failure;
  • hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors and/or inotropes support;
  • CT evidence of pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum;
  • concomitant acute medical disease (stroke; myocardial infarction; septic shock; gastrointestinal bleeding; acute renal failure requiring dialysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
All the patients undergo to helmet-CPAP setting PEEP at 10 cmH2O and performing a blood gas analysis after 2 hours
All the patients treated with CPAP receive a PEEP standard of 10 cmH2O with a fixed FiO2
Experimental: Group B
All the patients undergo to helmet-CPAP. PEEP was increased from 5 to 7.5 and 10 cmH20 in 30-minute steps during which lung ultrasound and blood gas analyses were repeated. The best PEEP was setted as the PEEP value before the appearance of lung pulse and with a PaO2/FiO2 levels stable or major than 20% in comparison to the basal value
All the patients treated with CPAP receive a PEEP standard of 10 cmH2O with a fixed FiO2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge or of endotracheal intubation or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days.
composite of hospital mortality and need of endotracheal intubation
From date of randomization until the date of discharge or of endotracheal intubation or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge or of endotracheal intubation or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days.
effect on P/F ratio at blood gas analyses
From date of randomization until the date of discharge or of endotracheal intubation or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of discharge or of endotracheal intubation or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days.
incidence of pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum
From date of randomization until the date of discharge or of endotracheal intubation or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 90 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Fabio G Numis, MD, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on PEEP Standard Protocol

3
Subscribe