to Compare the Effectiveness of Thulium Fiber Laser and Holmium YAG Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

January 3, 2024 updated by: Chi Fai NG, Chinese University of Hong Kong

TFL vs Ho:YAG - A Prospective Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Thulium Fiber Laser and Holmium YAG Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy

This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the difference in stone ablation rates of TFL and Ho:YAG laser in a clinical setting. Patients are randomized to receive URS with lithotripsy (URSL) either with TFL or Ho:YAG with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Primary outcome is the efficiency of stone ablation in terms of the stone ablation rate

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Having the advantages of being minimally invasive and simple, ureteroscopic lithotripsy is one of the treatment options for ureteric stone less than 1.5 cm. While many energy systems has been used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy, laser energy is the most commonly used approach for stone fragmentation. Currently, Holmium-YAG laser is the main laser platform being used due to its preciseness and safety. Unfortunately, Holmium-YAG laser system has some intrinsic problems, such as lower energy conversion ratio, excessive heat generation in machines, noise etc. Therefore, newer laser systems are being developed to overcome the problem. Thulium-fiber Laser (TFL) is the latest available laser system in the market with promising results. The advantages of TFL included better energy conversion ratio, less heat energy generation, more portable size, allow the generation of higher laser frequency for better stone dusting etc. Therefore, its uses are increasing popular. However, there are not many studies comparing the efficacy and stone free results of the Holmium-YAG laser and TFL systems in the literature. Therefore, investigators would like to perform a formal study to compare the two systems.

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sheung Shui, Hong Kong
        • North District Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18-years-old with informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on anti-coagulation
  • Patients with condition that increases the risk of urolithiasis (e.g. cystinuria, hyperparathyroidism, previous intestinal resection)
  • Patients with abnormal urinary tract (e.g. ileal conduit, neobladder, ureteric stricture)
  • Patients with stones > 15 mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Thulium-fibre laser (TFL)
The laser used in this group for surgical procedure ureteroscopic lithotripsy will be the Olympus SOLTIVETM Premium SuperPulsed laser system with a 365micron laser fibre. The laser pulse setting will be 1J x 10Hz, short pulse duration (adjusted up to 600microseconds).
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy is one of the surgical procedure options for ureteric stone less than 1.5 cm. While many energy systems has been used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy, laser energy is the most commonly used approach for stone fragmentation.
Active Comparator: Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG)
The laser used in this group for surgical procedure ureteroscopic lithotripsy will be the Lumenis VersaPulse® PowerSuiteTM 100W laser system with a 365micron laser fibre. The laser pulse setting will be 1J x 10Hz. Pulse duration is not adjustable in this machine (up to 600microseconds).
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy is one of the surgical procedure options for ureteric stone less than 1.5 cm. While many energy systems has been used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy, laser energy is the most commonly used approach for stone fragmentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The efficiency of stone ablation
Time Frame: Intraoperation
Measured by stone ablation rate(pre-operative stone volume/ laser time)
Intraoperation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operation time
Time Frame: Intra-operation
Duration of operation
Intra-operation
Laser time
Time Frame: Intra-operation
Duration of laser use
Intra-operation
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: The total number of days of hospitalization for this surgical procedure up to day 30 after the procedure
Total number of days of hospitalization for the surgical procedure
The total number of days of hospitalization for this surgical procedure up to day 30 after the procedure
Number of patient with Complications after surgical procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post-operation
Complications of treatment using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0
30 days post-operation
Stone free rate
Time Frame: 3 months post-operation
Defined by no detectable stone on post-operative 3-month NCCT
3 months post-operation
Number of patients require auxiliary procedure after the intervention
Time Frame: 3 months post-operation
Defined by any additional procedure
3 months post-operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chi Fai NG, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ureteric Stone

Clinical Trials on Ureteroscopic lithotripsy

3
Subscribe