- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05218057
to Compare the Effectiveness of Thulium Fiber Laser and Holmium YAG Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
TFL vs Ho:YAG - A Prospective Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Thulium Fiber Laser and Holmium YAG Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Having the advantages of being minimally invasive and simple, ureteroscopic lithotripsy is one of the treatment options for ureteric stone less than 1.5 cm. While many energy systems has been used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy, laser energy is the most commonly used approach for stone fragmentation. Currently, Holmium-YAG laser is the main laser platform being used due to its preciseness and safety. Unfortunately, Holmium-YAG laser system has some intrinsic problems, such as lower energy conversion ratio, excessive heat generation in machines, noise etc. Therefore, newer laser systems are being developed to overcome the problem. Thulium-fiber Laser (TFL) is the latest available laser system in the market with promising results. The advantages of TFL included better energy conversion ratio, less heat energy generation, more portable size, allow the generation of higher laser frequency for better stone dusting etc. Therefore, its uses are increasing popular. However, there are not many studies comparing the efficacy and stone free results of the Holmium-YAG laser and TFL systems in the literature. Therefore, investigators would like to perform a formal study to compare the two systems.
.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sheung Shui, Hong Kong
- North District Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients older than 18-years-old with informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients on anti-coagulation
- Patients with condition that increases the risk of urolithiasis (e.g. cystinuria, hyperparathyroidism, previous intestinal resection)
- Patients with abnormal urinary tract (e.g. ileal conduit, neobladder, ureteric stricture)
- Patients with stones > 15 mm
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Thulium-fibre laser (TFL)
The laser used in this group for surgical procedure ureteroscopic lithotripsy will be the Olympus SOLTIVETM Premium SuperPulsed laser system with a 365micron laser fibre.
The laser pulse setting will be 1J x 10Hz, short pulse duration (adjusted up to 600microseconds).
|
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy is one of the surgical procedure options for ureteric stone less than 1.5 cm.
While many energy systems has been used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy, laser energy is the most commonly used approach for stone fragmentation.
|
Active Comparator: Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG)
The laser used in this group for surgical procedure ureteroscopic lithotripsy will be the Lumenis VersaPulse® PowerSuiteTM 100W laser system with a 365micron laser fibre.
The laser pulse setting will be 1J x 10Hz.
Pulse duration is not adjustable in this machine (up to 600microseconds).
|
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy is one of the surgical procedure options for ureteric stone less than 1.5 cm.
While many energy systems has been used for stone fragmentation during ureteroscopy, laser energy is the most commonly used approach for stone fragmentation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The efficiency of stone ablation
Time Frame: Intraoperation
|
Measured by stone ablation rate(pre-operative stone volume/ laser time)
|
Intraoperation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Operation time
Time Frame: Intra-operation
|
Duration of operation
|
Intra-operation
|
Laser time
Time Frame: Intra-operation
|
Duration of laser use
|
Intra-operation
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: The total number of days of hospitalization for this surgical procedure up to day 30 after the procedure
|
Total number of days of hospitalization for the surgical procedure
|
The total number of days of hospitalization for this surgical procedure up to day 30 after the procedure
|
Number of patient with Complications after surgical procedure
Time Frame: 30 days post-operation
|
Complications of treatment using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0
|
30 days post-operation
|
Stone free rate
Time Frame: 3 months post-operation
|
Defined by no detectable stone on post-operative 3-month NCCT
|
3 months post-operation
|
Number of patients require auxiliary procedure after the intervention
Time Frame: 3 months post-operation
|
Defined by any additional procedure
|
3 months post-operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chi Fai NG, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Elashry OM, Tawfik AM. Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Dec;9(12):691-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.204. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
- Tae BS, Balpukov U, Cho SY, Jeong CW. Eleven-year Cumulative Incidence and Estimated Lifetime Prevalence of Urolithiasis in Korea: a National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort Based Study. J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jan 8;33(2):e13. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e13.
- Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep;58(5):299-306. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
- Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1301-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
- Li JK, Teoh JY, Ng CF. Updates in endourological management of urolithiasis. Int J Urol. 2019 Feb;26(2):172-183. doi: 10.1111/iju.13885. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
- Saussine C, Andonian S, Pacik D, Popiolek M, Celia A, Buchholz N, Sountoulides P, Petrut B, de la Rosette JJMCH. Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):297-303. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0629. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
- Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
- Fried NM. Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Aug 30;9(9):4552-4568. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.004552. eCollection 2018 Sep 1.
- Andreeva V, Vinarov A, Yaroslavsky I, Kovalenko A, Vybornov A, Rapoport L, Enikeev D, Sorokin N, Dymov A, Tsarichenko D, Glybochko P, Fried N, Traxer O, Altshuler G, Gapontsev V. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02785-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
- Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, Andronov AS, Plekhanova OA. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):795-800. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0581. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
- Traxer O, Corrales M. Managing Urolithiasis with Thulium Fiber Laser: Updated Real-Life Results-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 30;10(15):3390. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153390.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRE 2021.652
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ureteric Stone
-
Tor Erik SandUnknownUreteric Stent After Stone SurgeryNorway
-
Cairo UniversityBeni-Suef UniversityCompletedUreteric StoneEgypt
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruitingUreteric Stone | Stone UreterQatar
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Zayed Military HospitalRecruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityRecruitingRenal Stone | Ureter Stone | Ureteric ObstructionEgypt
-
Services Hospital, LahoreCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityUnknownUrologic Diseases | Stones, Kidney | Stone, Urinary | Shock Wave LithotripsyEgypt
Clinical Trials on Ureteroscopic lithotripsy
-
Zhujiang HospitalUnknown
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...RecruitingUrolithiasis | Overactive Bladder SyndromeChina
-
Ankara Training and Research HospitalCompletedUreterolithiasis | Ureter Stone | Ureter CalculiTurkey
-
Applaud Medical, Inc.Active, not recruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompleted
-
University of Southern CaliforniaCompleted
-
Sismanoglio General HospitalRecruitingComplication,Postoperative | Lithiasis, UrinaryGreece
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedNephrolithiasisUnited States
-
EgymedicalpediaCompletedStone, Kidney | Child, OnlyEgypt