Impact of a Corrie Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (mTECH-Rehab)

November 20, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Impact of a Mobile Technology Enabled Corrie Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on Functional Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes (mTECH-Rehab): A Randomized Controlled Trial

In this randomized clinical trial, the researchers are investigating whether a multi-component virtual/hybrid cardiac rehabilitation program will improve functional status, cholesterol level, overall cardiovascular health, individual risk factors, quality of life and mental health for patients who have recently been diagnosed with myocardial infarction, received a coronary stent, underwent heart surgery or catheter-based valve replacement, as compared to traditional, center-based cardiac rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

259

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Individuals admitted to the hospital for the following conditions or interventions during the index admission: Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI type 1), Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and Coronary artery angioplasty/stenting (PCI), Heart valve surgery, catheter-based aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-English speaking
  • Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis or other severe valvular disease
  • Physical disability that would preclude safe and adequate exercise performance
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with peak resting left ventricular outflow gradient of >25 mmHg
  • Known aortic dissection
  • Severe resting arterial hypertension (Systolic blood pressure >200 mmHg or diastolic BP >110mmHg) at baseline assessment
  • Mental impairment leading to inability to cooperate with study procedures
  • Untreated high degree atrioventricular block
  • Atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled ventricular rate (Heart rate >110 at rest) at baseline assessment
  • History of cardiac arrest or sudden death
  • Myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery complications with cardiogenic shock and/or congestive heart failure and/or signs/symptoms of post-procedure ischemia
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%
  • History of Clinically significant depression
  • Visual or hearing impairment which precludes the use of the intervention
  • Presence of cardiac defibrillator
  • Incomplete revascularization procedure
  • History of one or more episodes of falls in the last year
  • Pregnancy

    • If patients are deemed clinically unstable and unable to participate at the time of initial screening, the research team member may return at a later date to determine whether this status has changed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Corrie Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (Intervention Group)
Receives Corrie Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation Program along with option to continue traditional, center-based cardiac rehabilitation.
The Corrie Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program is a multi-component intervention. It consists of the Corrie smartphone app for cardiovascular health optimization which is paired with wristband device (Apple Watch or Fitbit), Bluetooth-enabled Omron blood pressure monitor and exercise resistance bands. The program also includes individualized treatment plan development, setting health goals and communication with trained Corrie Health Coach. Furthermore, the intervention includes motivational text messages sent to participants throughout the study to aid with risk factor modification.
No Intervention: Facilitated Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (Control Group)
Receives traditional, center-based cardiac rehabilitation. The study team will help facilitate the logistics of receiving center-based cardiac rehabilitation, including proper referrals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-minute Walking Distance (Meters)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Mean difference in 6 minute walk distance, between Intervention and Control groups, as measured at final study visit occurring at 12 weeks after randomization.
12 weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Cardiovascular Health Metric for Secondary Prevention
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The cardiovascular health metric for secondary prevention (adapted from American Heart Association's Life Simple 7). The score ranges from 0 to 14 with higher score indicating better cardiovascular health.
12 weeks after randomization
Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Systolic blood pressure and Diastolic blood pressure
12 weeks after randomization
Low Density Lipoprotein - Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
LDL cholesterol level (in mg/dl) measured through blood sample drawn at 12 week follow up visit
12 weeks after randomization
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (%) measured through blood sample drawn at 12 week follow up visit
12 weeks after randomization
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
BMI = weight (kg) / height in meters squared (m^2). Weight and height measured by study staff at study visit.
12 weeks after randomization
Quality of Life as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health-10
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health-10: The 10-item patient-reported questionnaire administered at 12 weeks follow up in which the response options are presented as 5-point (as well as a single 11-point) rating scales. The results of the questions are used to calculate two summary scores: a Global Physical Health Score and a Global Mental Health score. These scores are then standardized to the general population, using the "T-Score". The average "T-Score" for the United States population is 50 points, with a standard deviation of 10 points. Higher scores indicate a healthier patient.
12 weeks after randomization
Blood Pressure Control
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Blood pressure control (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg). Intermediate (SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg). Poor (SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg).
12 weeks after randomization
Cholesterol (LDL-C) Control
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Cholesterol (LDL-C) control (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (LDL-C <70mg/dL). Intermediate (LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL). Poor (LDL-C ≥100mg/dL)
12 weeks after randomization
Diabetes Control
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Diabetes (HbA1c) control (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (HbA1c <7% for diabetic, <5.7% for non-diabetic). Intermediate (HbA1c 7.0-7.9% for diabetic, 5.0-5.9% for non-diabetic). Poor (HbA1c ≥8% for diabetic, ≥6.5% for non-diabetic).
12 weeks after randomization
Weight (BMI) Categories
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Weight (BMI) categories (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (BMI <25 kg/m^2). Intermediate (BMI 25-29 kg/m^2). Poor (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m^2).
12 weeks after randomization
Physical Activity Categories
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Physical activity categories (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (≥150 min/wk moderate physical activity, ≥75 min/wk vigorous physical activity). Intermediate (1-149 min/wk moderate physical activity, 1-74 min/wk vigorous physical activity). Poor (No regular exercise).
12 weeks after randomization
Diet Categories
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Diet categories (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (Rate Your Plate score 64-81). Intermediate (Rate Your Plate score 46-63). Poor (Rate Your Plate score 27-45).
12 weeks after randomization
Tobacco Use
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Tobacco use categories (Cardiovascular secondary health metric component). Ideal (never). Intermediate (Former smoker). Poor (Recent/Current smoker).
12 weeks after randomization
Cardiac Rehabilitation Engagement
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Cardiac rehabilitation engagement as measured by number of participants who attended the sessions per category. Grouped by Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) categories: Initiation (0-12 sessions attended), Engagement 1 (13-24 sessions attended), Engagement 2 (25-36 sessions attended).
12 weeks after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire 8
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization

The difference in depressive symptoms as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ 8): The 8 item questionnaire administered at 12 weeks with the following scoring system: Score range 0-24. A score of 10 or greater is considered major depression, 20 or more is severe major depression.

Note, as an exploratory outcome, only a subgroup of participants responded to this survey request.

12 weeks after randomization
Anxiety as Assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The difference in anxiety level as measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD 7): The 7-item questionnaire administered at 12 weeks follow up with the following scoring system. Each item is assigned scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories. GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. 0-4: minimal anxiety 5-9: mild anxiety 10-14: moderate anxiety 15-21: severe anxiety.
12 weeks after randomization
Stress as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale-10
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The difference in stress level as measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS -10): The 10 item questionnaire administered at 12 weeks follow up. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
12 weeks after randomization
Health Literacy as Assessed by the (e) Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The difference in Health Literacy as measured by The (e) Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS): The 8 item scale administered at 12 weeks follow up. Total scores of the eHEALS range from 8 to 40, with higher scores representing higher self-perceived (e) Health literacy.
12 weeks after randomization
Patient Activation as Assessed by the Patient Activation Measure 10
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
The difference in patient activation as measured by Patient Activation Measure 10 (PAM 10): The 10-item five-point Likert scale for assessing patient activation at 12 weeks follow up, indicating whether the patient possesses the necessary knowledge, skills, and confidence needed for self-care. The total score reference range is from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater patient activation and ability for self-care.
12 weeks after randomization
User Engagement as Assessed by the Number of App Interactions (Intervention Group Only)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Number of interactions in the smartphone app per participant, collected via the Corrie Health Platform User Analytics at 12 weeks follow up (only assessed in intervention arm).
12 weeks after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lena Mathews, MD, MHS, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified, aggregate level results, including primary and secondary outcomes, and the data dictionary will be shared through clinicaltrials.gov. Study documents (study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form, analytic code) will also be shared upon request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be made available upon request for up to 3 years from the study completion date (to 10/14/2027).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a letter of intention and formal data request to the mTECH-Rehab principal investigator, who will review the request with the core study team and grant approval based on evaluation of merit.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Corrie Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Subscribe