S.T.O.P.® Technology Contact Lenses Versus Dual-focus Contact Lenses for Slowing Down Myopia Progression in Children

March 10, 2024 updated by: nthalmic Pty Ltd

Contact Lenses Utilising S.T.O.P.® Technology Versus Dual-focus Contact Lenses for Slowing Down Myopia Progression in Children: A Three-year Prospective, Multi-centre, Controlled, Masked, Randomised, Non Inferiority Clinical Trial

To compare the rate of myopia progression of contact lenses utilising S.T.O.P.® technology against MiSight® contact lenses.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Myopic children (8-14 years of age) will be randomly allocated to wear one of 3 contact lens options (MiSight®, S.T.O.P.®- F2 or S.T.O.P.®- DT) bilaterally on a daily wear basis. The overall trial duration, including follow-up period, is expected to be approximately 48 months. Each participant's duration is expected to be approximately 36 months.

The visits are Baseline / Fit, Dispensing, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months then visits every 6 months after.

All procedures performed at these visits are standard, non invasive clinical tests.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

441

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Lucheng District
      • Wenzhou, Lucheng District, China, 325027
        • Recruiting
        • Wenzhou Medical University Eye Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jiang Jun
    • Wuqing District
      • Tianjin, Wuqing District, China, 300384
        • Recruiting
        • Tianjin Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lin Liu
    • Xuhui District
      • Shanghai, Xuhui District, China, 200031
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xing Tao Zhou, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Zhi Chen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jia Qi Zhou, MD, PhD
    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500034
        • Recruiting
        • LV Prasad Eye Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pavan K Verkicharla
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Swati Panigrahi
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Megha Anthony
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500046
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The University of Hyderabad
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nagaraju Konda
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • M Radhika
      • Madrid, Spain, 28037
        • Recruiting
        • Ocupharm Research Group (Clinica Universitaria de Optometría), Universidad Complutense Madrid
        • Contact:
          • Gonzalo Carracedo Rodríguez, PhD
          • Phone Number: +34616513539
          • Email: jgcarrac@ucm.es
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gonzalo Carracedo Rodríguez, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laura Batres, PhD
    • Barcelona
      • Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain, 08222
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Universitari de la Visió
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nuria Tomas Corominas
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Juan Perez Corral
    • Galicia
      • Santiago De Compostela, Galicia, Spain, 15899
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Lab. de Superficie Ocular y Lentes de Contacto (SOYLC)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Javier Gonzalez Perez
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ángel Sánchez García

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 8-14.
  • Have:

    • Read the Informed Assent.
    • Been explained the Informed Assent.
    • Indicated an understanding of the Informed Assent.
    • Signed the Informed Assent.
  • Have their parent / legal guardian:

    • Read the Informed Consent.
    • Been explained the Informed Consent.
    • Indicated an understanding of the Informed Consent.
    • Signed the Informed Consent.
  • Along with their parent / legal guardian, be capable of comprehending the nature of the study, and be willing and able to adhere to study requirements.
  • Along with their parent / legal guardian, agree to maintain the visit schedule .
  • Agree to wear allocated contact lenses for a minimum of 5 days per week, at least 6 hours per day on days lenses are worn but not > 16 hours per day, and to remove lenses at night (i.e., daily wear only with no contact lens wear during sleep), for their duration of the study and to inform the investigator if their schedule is interrupted. Wearing time can be modified by the investigator for health reasons.
  • Possess wearable and visually functioning spectacles.
  • Be in good general health, based on the parent's / legal guardian's knowledge.
  • Have best-corrected high contrast visual acuity based on manifest refraction of 0.10 logMAR (20/25, 6/7.6) or better in each eye.
  • Meet the following criteria determined by cycloplegic autorefraction:

    • Spherical equivalent between -0.75 to -4.00 D inclusive.
    • Astigmatism ≥ -1.00 D.

      *participants who fail astigmatism criterion with autorefraction pass astigmatism criterion if ≥ -0.75 D is measured with subjective refraction.

    • anisometropia ≤ 1.00 D.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is currently, or within 30 days prior to this study, has been an active participant in another study.
  • Current or prior use of ANY form of myopia control, including but not limited to:

    • Optical devices.

      • Bifocal / multifocal spectacles of any type.
      • Bifocal / multifocal contact lenses of any type.
      • Orthokeratology of any type.
    • Pharmacological agents.

      • European and Indian sites: Atropine.
      • Chinese sites: Atropine with a concentration > 0.01%. Participants who have previously used 0.01% atropine are eligible for this study provided they agree not to use 0.01% atropine for at least 30 days before baseline and at any time during the study.
      • Pirenzepine.
  • Participant born earlier than 30 weeks or weighed < 1500 g at birth.
  • Habitual use of a systemic or topical medication that may alter normal ocular findings / is known to affect a participant's ocular health / physiology or contact lens performance either in an adverse or beneficial manner at enrolment and / or during the clinical trial.
  • A known allergy to sodium fluorescein, benoxinate, proparacaine, or tropicamide.
  • Chinese sites: A known allergy to cyclopentolate.
  • A known corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, ocular viral or fungal infections, or any other recurrent ocular infections.
  • Strabismus by cover test at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) while wearing distance correction under non-cycloplegic conditions.
  • Known ocular or systemic disease, such as but not limited to:

    • Diabetes.
    • Graves' disease.
    • Glaucoma.
    • Uveitis.
    • Scleritis.
    • Auto-immune diseases such as ankylosing spondylitis, multiple sclerosis, Sjogrens syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Any ocular, systemic, or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development, such as but not limited to:

    • Persistent pupillary membrane.
    • Vitreous haemorrhage.
    • Cataract.
    • Central corneal scarring.
    • Eyelid haemangiomas.
    • Marfan's syndrome.
    • Down's syndrome.
    • Ehler's-Danlos syndrome.
    • Stickler's syndrome.
    • Ocular albinism.
    • Retinopathy of prematurity.
  • Keratoconus or irregular cornea.
  • Biomicroscopic that contraindicate contact lens, such as but limited to:

    • Neovascularisation or ghost vessels ≥ 1.5 mm in from limbus.
    • Any active anterior segment disease that contraindicates safe contact lens wear.
    • Clinically significant giant papillary conjunctivitis.
    • Clinically significant abnormalities of the anterior segment, lids, conjunctiva, sclera, or associated structures.
    • Allergic or seasonal conjunctivitis if the investigator believes it could significantly interfere with maintaining a specified wearing schedule.
  • The investigator may, at their discretion, exclude anyone who they believe may not be able to fulfil the clinical trial requirements or it is believed to be in the participant's best interests.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MiSight®
MiSight® Contact Lens (Omafilcon A, 60% water)
Omafilcon A (60% water)
Experimental: S.T.O.P® F2
S.T.O.P® F2 Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water)
Ocufilcon D, 55% water
Experimental: S.T.O.P® DT
S.T.O.P® DT Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water)
Ocufilcon D, 55% water

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Axial Length
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Difference in change from baseline in axial length between test and control contact lenses.
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Difference in change from baseline in spherical equivalent autorefraction between test and control contact lenses.
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Visual performance as measured by high contrast visual acuity at 6 m
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Visual performance as measured by a non validated questionnaire based on a 1-10 numeric rating scale where a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Bulbar hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in bulbar hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Limbal hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in limbal hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Palpebral roughness graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased roughness
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in palpebral roughness grading between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Corneal staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in corneal staining grading between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Conjunctival staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining
Time Frame: 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Differences in conjunctival staining grading between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 3 m
Time Frame: 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Differences in heterophoria at 3 m between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 40 cm
Time Frame: 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Differences in heterophoria at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative facility (+/-2.00 D flipper) in cycles per minute at 40 cm
Time Frame: 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Differences in monocular accommodative facility at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative response in diopters at 40 cm
Time Frame: 1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Differences in monocular accommodative response at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Corneal topography as measured by flat keratometry measurement in diopters
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 36 months
Differences in flat keratometry measurements between test and control contact lenses.
Baseline, 12 months, 36 months
Corneal topography as measured by steep keratometry measurement in diopters
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 36 months
Differences in steep keratometry measurements between test and control contact lenses.
Baseline, 12 months, 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Tilia, MOptom, PhD, nthalmic Pty Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • nthal2021-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on MiSight®

3
Subscribe