Socket Shield Technique Versus Early Implant Placement With Contour Augmentation

Socket Shielding in Immediate Versus Early Implant Placement With Contour Augmentation of Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone. A Randomized Pilot Clinical Study.

comparing socket shield technique with early implant placement with contour augmentation in preserving the bone contour

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: Bone Loss; Bone Resorption
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: contour augmentation

Detailed Description

comparing immediate implant placement with socket shield technique and final crown after 3 months with extraction and after 4 to 8 weeks implant placement with contour bone augmentation then after 3 to 4 months final crown delivery

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 20
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Cairo, Egypt, 11553
    • Cairo University
    • Contact: iman abdelwahab radi, PHD; Phone Number: 002 01001539613; Email: iman.abdelwahab@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
    • Contact: Amir alaa Elawady, BDS; Phone Number: 01020205791; Email: Amir112093@miuegypt.edu.eg

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 60 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone
2. Intact adjacent teeth
3. Adequate palatal and apical bone that allows achieving implant primary stability.
4. Type I socket
5. ≥18 years
6. ≤ 60 years
7. Systemically healthy patients

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Extraction sockets with acute or chronic infection or with adjacent infected teeth
2. Heavy Smokers > than 10 cigarettes daily
3. Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy during or within the last 6 months.
4. Unmotivated patients to maintain adequate oral hygiene to follow up.
5. Patients with physical disabilities that could affect follow up.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: socket shield technique; immediate implant placement with socket shield technique	Procedure: contour augmentation; early implant placement with contour bone augmentation
Active Comparator: contour augmentation; early implant placement with contour bone augmentation	Procedure: contour augmentation; early implant placement with contour bone augmentation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
facial bone thickness	using superimposed CBCT images	12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
facial bone height changes	using superimposed CBCT images	12 months
Soft tissue height changes	using superimposed intraoral scans	12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi, PhD

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Anticipated): March 31, 2022
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): March 31, 2023
• Study Completion (Anticipated): September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 28, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 26, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 25, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 11, 2022
• Last Verified: March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Musculoskeletal Diseases; Bone Diseases; Bone Resorption
• Other Study ID Numbers: sst versus contour aug

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No