Bloodletting Puncture in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Bloodletting Puncture in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Mixed-method Study of a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial and Focus Group

The bloodletting puncture is an external treatment for acute ischemic stroke by releasing an appropriate amount of blood with a three-edged needle at specific points on the patient's body. As a special treatment for acute ischemic stroke, it has been used clinically in hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine in China for many years and has achieved certain efficacy. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and objective clinical observation and mechanism research on this treatment method, as well as a lack of scientific efficacy evaluation standards and technical specifications. Therefore, we planned to explore the effectiveness, safety and accessibility of bloodletting puncture in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke through a mixed-method study of a multi-center randomised controlled trial and focus group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ischemic stroke is a common disease of nervous system, with high morbidity, mortality and disability, which seriously threatens human health. According to the latest global burden of disease research, the overall lifetime risk of stroke in China is 39.9%, ranking first in the world. Intravenous thrombolysis is one of the most effective treatment methods for AIS at present. Although the recanalization rate of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase can reach about 50%, in actual treatment, about 1/3 of patients experience reocclusion after thrombolytic therapy, resulting in neurological deterioration.

The bloodletting puncture as a traditional first aid measure in Chinese medicine could improves the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, reduces the degree of neurological deficits and facilitates the recovery of consciousness in patients with impaired awareness. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and objective clinical observation and mechanistic studies on this treatment method, as well as a lack of scientific efficacy evaluation standards and technical specifications.

This is a mixed-method study of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial and focus group, and the subjects are patients with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of onset. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and accessibility of bloodletting puncture in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Subjects who meet the inclusion criteria but do not meet the exclusion criteria are randomly divided into two groups:respectively, namely: Group 1 Test group (conventional Western medical treatment + bloodletting puncture);Group 2 Control group (conventional Western medical treatment).The total duration of bloodletting puncture treatment is 7 days. The patients are observed immediately after the end of bloodletting puncture treatment, 7 days after the end of bloodletting puncture treatment, and followed up to 14 days and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture treatment. The study endpoints included NIHSS score after 7 days of bloodletting puncture treatment (primary efficacy indicator), change from baseline values of NIHSS score, Glasgow score and mRS score after 7, 14 and 30 days of bloodletting puncture treatment (secondary efficacy indicators), stroke recurrence rate and mortality rate within 30 days (secondary efficacy indicators), and separate patients and physicians interviews at day 7 of bloodletting puncture treatment. The safety,efficacy and accessibility of bloodletting puncture in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke by statistical analysis of endpoint indicators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. According to the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2018, the patient is clinically diagnosed as acute ischemic stroke;
  2. Age 40-85, regardless of gender;
  3. NIHSS score: 4 ≤ screening period/baseline NIHSS score ≤ 20;
  4. Within 7 days of the onset;
  5. The subject or his/her guardian participates voluntarily and signs the ICF.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with transient cerebral ischaemic attack or cerebral embolism caused by brain tumour or traumatic brain injury, or acute cerebral haemorrhage or intracranial tumour;
  2. Patients who have received other vascular opening therapies before enrollment, such as: arterial thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, angioplasty stenting, etc;
  3. Patients who have received thrombolytic therapy prior to enrollment, including: recombinant tissue-type fibrinogen activator (r-TPA), urokinase, etc;
  4. Presence of severe coagulation disorders, history of systemic bleeding;
  5. Fasting blood glucose < 2.8 or > 16.8 mmol/L or with severe complications due to diabetes (e.g. peripheral neuropathy or diabetic gangrene);
  6. Life expectancy of < 3 months due to any advanced disease;
  7. Patients with a combination of serious primary diseases of the cardiovascular, hepatic, renal and haematopoietic systems, psychiatric disorders (including addiction and substance use disorders, dissociative disorders and schizophrenia);
  8. Pregnant/lactating women, or women of childbearing potential who plan to have a pregnancy during the 12-month period;
  9. Patients who have participated in drug or device trials within one month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Test group
conventional Western medical treatment + bloodletting puncture
All acupoints are positioned according to the WHO standard acupuncture point locations in the Western Pacific Region. Operation: The patient is placed in a reasonable position, the acupuncture site is exposed, and the operator uses pushing, rubbing, squeezing and butterfly on or around the acupuncture site to collect blood at the acupuncture site before pricking, and then disinfects the acupuncture site with 75% ethanol. If more bleeding occurs, press with sterile dry cotton balls to stop the bleeding. The treatment was performed once daily for 7 days.
The patients in both groups were given conventional comprehensive treatment such as improving cerebral circulation, neuroprotection, antiplatelet aggregation, lipid regulation and symptomatic management after admission. Patients with hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease were given individualised symptomatic treatment and advised to stop smoking, drinking alcohol and other adverse lifestyles as far as possible.
Other: Control group
conventional Western medical treatment.
The patients in both groups were given conventional comprehensive treatment such as improving cerebral circulation, neuroprotection, antiplatelet aggregation, lipid regulation and symptomatic management after admission. Patients with hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease were given individualised symptomatic treatment and advised to stop smoking, drinking alcohol and other adverse lifestyles as far as possible.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)score 7 days after bloodletting puncture treatment
Time Frame: 7 days after the start of bloodletting puncture treatment
The NIHSS is an 11-item test that assesses the degree of functional impairment caused by stroke, with scores ranging from 0 to 42; higher scores mean a worse outcome.
7 days after the start of bloodletting puncture treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The value of change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline at 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Time Frame: 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
0-42; higher scores mean a worse outcome.
7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
The value of change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score from baseline at 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Time Frame: 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
3-15; the lower the score means the greater the impairment of consciousness
7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
The value of change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score from baseline at 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Time Frame: 7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
0-5;the higher the score means the greater the degree of disability
7, 14 and 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
The incidence of new vascular events within 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Time Frame: 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardio-cerebral revascularization
30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
All-cause mortality 30 days after the start of administration
Time Frame: 30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
All-cause deaths within 30 days / (total number of people in each group) x 100%
30 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
The number of adverse events/serious adverse events reported by the investigator throughout the study period
Time Frame: 7 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Significant abnormalities in vital signs, blood count, urine count, liver function, kidney function
7 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: 7 days after the start of bloodletting puncture
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the doctors and patients participating in this study, to analyse the factors influencing the acceptance and feasibility of the implementation of the blood pricking method during the study
7 days after the start of bloodletting puncture

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jun Tang, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Western medicine conventional treatment +Bloodletting puncture

3
Subscribe