Topical Ice-therapy for Intravitreal Injections

April 25, 2024 updated by: University of Minnesota

Topical Ice-therapy for Pain Modulation During Intravitreal Injections: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Purpose: To examine the difference in patient's pain experience in the setting of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections with pretreatment of topical ice-therapy compared with no-ice.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Recruiting
        • University of Minnesota
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients aged 18 or older evaluated by a single retina specialist at the University of Minnesota Department of Ophthalmology with a clinical indication necessitating an anti-VEGF intravitreal injection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ice-therapy
Ice therapy will be provided prior to the provision of the intravitreal injection
Ice therapy will be provided prior to intravitreal injection provision
Placebo Comparator: No Ice-therapy
No ice therapy will be provided prior to the provision of the intravitreal injection
No additional intervention (i.e.) ice therapy will be provided prior to intravitreal injection provision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discomfort assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to discomfort, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to discomfort.
This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Itching assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to itching, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to itching.
This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Burning assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to burning, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to burning.
This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Overall Pain assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall pain, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall pain.
This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Overall Tolerability assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall tolerability, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall tolerability.
This will be assessed at five minutes after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discomfort assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to discomfort, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to discomfort.
This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Itching assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to itching, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to itching.
This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Burning assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to burning, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to burning.
This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Overall Pain assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall pain, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall pain.
This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
Overall Tolerability assessed by the visual analog scale
Time Frame: This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection
This primary outcome measure will be surveyed using a visual analog scale to quantify discomfort from a numerical level of one to ten. A self reported rating of one represents the lowest self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall tolerability, while a rating of ten signifies the maximum self-reported subjective rating attributed to overall tolerability.
This will be assessed at 24-hours after the conclusion of the intravitreal injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jade Moon, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OPH-2022-30605

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injection Site Irritation

Clinical Trials on Ice-therapy

3
Subscribe