Accelerated iTBS in Smoking Cessation

September 13, 2022 updated by: Cyprus rTMS Center

Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Study

Cigarette smoking is one of the foremost causes of preventable disease and premature death. In 2014, 68% of adult smokers wanted to quit smoking and in 2017, 55.1% of adult smokers had made a quit attempt. However, only a small percentage of adult smokers (7,4%) achieved to quit smoking.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a novel, powerful, non-invasive brain stimulation therapy. This study used Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), a newer form of rTMS protocol that can be delivered in a shorter duration compared to the standard rTMS protocol, while delivering a comparable number of pulses. It is a tolerable, powerful, and useful tool in non-invasive brain stimulation therapies.

This double-blind randomized control trial evaluated the efficacy of 4 iTBS sessions per day during 5 consecutive days over the left DLPFC in smoking cessation. Moreover, it investigated whether the exposure to smoking-related cues during the rTMS treatment, compared to neutral cues impact cigarette craving.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cigarette smoking is one of the foremost causes of preventable disease and premature death. In 2014, 68% of adult smokers wanted to quit smoking and in 2017, 55.1% of adult smokers had made a quit attempt. However, only a small percentage of adult smokers (7,4%) achieved to quit smoking. Behavioral and psychological interventions, pharmacological interventions as well as nicotine replacement therapy are some of the most used interventions for smoking cessation with medium to low success rates. Nonetheless, in recent years there has been growing interest in new, alternative, and effective treatments for smoking cessation.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a novel, powerful, non-invasive brain stimulation therapy. TMS non-invasively (transcranially) delivers magnetic pulses to a brain region, inducing electric a current that can depolarize neurons and induce action potentials. This study used Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), a newer form of rTMS protocol that can be delivered in a shorter duration compared to the standard rTMS protocol, while delivering a comparable number of pulses. It is a tolerable, powerful, and useful tool in non-invasive brain stimulation therapies.

This double-blind randomized control trial evaluated the efficacy of 4 iTBS sessions per day during 5 consecutive days over the left DLPFC in smoking cessation. Moreover, it investigated whether the exposure to smoking-related cues during the rTMS treatment, compared to neutral cues impact cigarette craving. The investigators hypothesized that twenty sessions of accelerated theta burst simulation over the left DLPFC while exposed to smoking-related cues, would reduce cigarette consumption and cigarette cravings, accompanied by reduced stress and motivation to quit smoking, compared to both active and sham stimulation with neutral-cues.

A total of 104 cigarettes smokers, who wanted to quit smoking, were enrolled and were randomly divided into the three experimental groups: the first group received active aiTBS stimulation while watching neutral videos, the second group received active aiTBS stimulation while watching smoking-related videos and the last group received sham stimulation while watching smoking-related videos. Primary and secondary measurements were performed at the baseline, during the treatment period, at one week, one month and six months post rTMS treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Larnaca, Cyprus
        • Cyprus rTMS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 18-70
  2. native or fluent Greek speaker.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. mental objects or implants in the brain, skull or near head (e.g., pacemakers, metal plates)
  2. past or current of diagnosis of neurological or psychiatric disorder
  3. use of psychiatric medication
  4. past or current drug or alcohol abuse, other than nicotine
  5. use of IQOS ("I Quit Original Smoking") or electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active TMS & Neutral videos
Received active iTBS stimulation while watching neutral videos
An accelerated iTBS (aiTBS) treatment (4 sessions with 30 minutes break between them) was administered daily for a 5-day period over the left DLPFC using the MagVenture Cool-B65 Active/Placebo (A/P) coil.
Experimental: Active TMS & Smoking videos
Received active iTBS stimulation while watching smoking-related videos
An accelerated iTBS (aiTBS) treatment (4 sessions with 30 minutes break between them) was administered daily for a 5-day period over the left DLPFC using the MagVenture Cool-B65 Active/Placebo (A/P) coil.
Sham Comparator: Sham TMS & Smoking videos
Received sham stimulation while watching smoking-related videos
An accelerated iTBS (aiTBS) treatment (4 sessions with 30 minutes break between them) was administered daily for a 5-day period over the left DLPFC using the MagVenture Cool-B65 Active/Placebo (A/P) coil. The MagVenture Cool-B65 Active/Placebo (A/P) coil is designed to support true "double blinded" clinical trials as it can produce active and placebo stimulation by flipping the coil and can mimic tapping sensation during placebo condition During the sham condition, the coil produced the same sound as the real active condition but did not deliver any stimulation on the side of the participant's skull.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Baseline
Τhe number of cigarettes participants usually smoke before the treatment.
Baseline
Self-reported Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: After 1st treatment day
Participants were required to record the number of cigarettes smoked after the completion of the 1st day of treatment until before the first session on the second day of treatment. Participants were asked not to smoke during the breaks of the 4 daily rTMS sessions
After 1st treatment day
Self-reported Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: After 2nd treatment day
Participants were required to record the number of cigarettes smoked after the completion of the 2nd day of treatment until before the first session on the 3rd day of treatment. Participants were asked not to smoke during the breaks of the 4 daily rTMS sessions
After 2nd treatment day
Self-reported Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: After 3rd treatment day
Participants were required to record the number of cigarettes smoked after the completion of the 3rd day of treatment until before the first session on the 4th day of treatment. Participants were asked not to smoke during the breaks of the 4 daily rTMS sessions
After 3rd treatment day
Self-reported Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: After 4th treatment day
Participants were required to record the number of cigarettes smoked after the completion of the 4th day of treatment until before the first session on the 5th day of treatment . Participants were asked not to smoke during the breaks of the 4 daily rTMS sessions
After 4th treatment day
Carbon Monoxide (CO)- Evaluated Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Baseline
CO level was measured using the piCO Smokerlyzer breath carbon monoxide meter device prior to the first rTMS session.
Baseline
Carbon Monoxide (CO)- Evaluated Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Day 1
The average of the four CO-levels, measured before each of the four sessions on Day 1.
Day 1
Carbon Monoxide (CO)- Evaluated Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Day 2
The average of the four CO-levels, measured before each of the four sessions on Day 2.
Day 2
Carbon Monoxide (CO)- Evaluated Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Day 3
The average of the four CO-levels, measured before each of the four sessions on Day 3.
Day 3
Carbon Monoxide (CO)- Evaluated Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Day 4
The average of the four CO-levels, measured before each of the four sessions on Day 4.
Day 4
Carbon Monoxide (CO)- Evaluated Nicotine Consumption
Time Frame: Day 5
The average of the four CO-levels, measured before each of the four sessions on Day 5.
Day 5
Nicotine Dependence
Time Frame: Baseline
Fagerström test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) is a short, self-report measure that assesses nicotine dependence. It contains six questions, and the total score is calculated as a sum of these six questions. The scores vary from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower dependence on nicotine.
Baseline
Nicotine Dependence
Time Frame: End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Fagerström test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) is a short, self-report measure that assesses nicotine dependence. It contains six questions, and the total score is calculated as a sum of these six questions. The scores vary from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower dependence on nicotine.
End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Nicotine Dependence
Time Frame: 1 week follow up
Fagerström test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) is a short, self-report measure that assesses nicotine dependence. It contains six questions, and the total score is calculated as a sum of these six questions. The scores vary from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower dependence on nicotine.
1 week follow up
Nicotine Dependence
Time Frame: 1 month follow up
Fagerström test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) is a short, self-report measure that assesses nicotine dependence. It contains six questions, and the total score is calculated as a sum of these six questions. The scores vary from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower dependence on nicotine.
1 month follow up
Nicotine Dependence
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
Fagerström test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) is a short, self-report measure that assesses nicotine dependence. It contains six questions, and the total score is calculated as a sum of these six questions. The scores vary from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower dependence on nicotine.
6 months follow up
Momentary Craving
Time Frame: Baseline
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a psychometric measurement instrument that measures symptom severity on a continuous scale. The VAS can be quickly and repeatedly administered between tasks and it has been used extensively in smoking research with TMS. We used the VAS to assess smoking craving by asking participants to respond to the question "How much do you want to smoke right now?", on a scale from 0 "no craving" to 100 "most craving ever experienced" by choosing a response on a visual scale given in front of them on a tablet.
Baseline
Momentary Craving
Time Frame: Day 1

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a psychometric measurement instrument that measures symptom severity on a continuous scale. The VAS can be quickly and repeatedly administered between tasks and it has been used extensively in smoking research with TMS. We used the VAS to assess smoking craving by asking participants to respond to the question "How much do you want to smoke right now?", on a scale from 0 "no craving" to 100 "most craving ever experienced" by choosing a response on a visual scale given in front of them on a tablet.

The average of the eight VAS scores, measured prior and post each of the four sessions on Day 1.

Day 1
Momentary Craving
Time Frame: Day 2

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a psychometric measurement instrument that measures symptom severity on a continuous scale. The VAS can be quickly and repeatedly administered between tasks and it has been used extensively in smoking research with TMS. We used the VAS to assess smoking craving by asking participants to respond to the question "How much do you want to smoke right now?", on a scale from 0 "no craving" to 100 "most craving ever experienced" by choosing a response on a visual scale given in front of them on a tablet.

The average of the eight VAS scores, measured prior and post each of the four sessions on Day 2.

Day 2
Momentary Craving
Time Frame: Day 3

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a psychometric measurement instrument that measures symptom severity on a continuous scale. The VAS can be quickly and repeatedly administered between tasks and it has been used extensively in smoking research with TMS. We used the VAS to assess smoking craving by asking participants to respond to the question "How much do you want to smoke right now?", on a scale from 0 "no craving" to 100 "most craving ever experienced" by choosing a response on a visual scale given in front of them on a tablet.

The average of the eight VAS scores, measured prior and post each of the four sessions on Day 3.

Day 3
Momentary Craving
Time Frame: Day 4

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a psychometric measurement instrument that measures symptom severity on a continuous scale. The VAS can be quickly and repeatedly administered between tasks and it has been used extensively in smoking research with TMS. We used the VAS to assess smoking craving by asking participants to respond to the question "How much do you want to smoke right now?", on a scale from 0 "no craving" to 100 "most craving ever experienced" by choosing a response on a visual scale given in front of them on a tablet.

The average of the eight VAS scores, measured prior and post each of the four sessions on Day 4.

Day 4
Momentary Craving
Time Frame: Day 5

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a psychometric measurement instrument that measures symptom severity on a continuous scale. The VAS can be quickly and repeatedly administered between tasks and it has been used extensively in smoking research with TMS. We used the VAS to assess smoking craving by asking participants to respond to the question "How much do you want to smoke right now?", on a scale from 0 "no craving" to 100 "most craving ever experienced" by choosing a response on a visual scale given in front of them on a tablet.

The average of the eight VAS scores, measured prior and post each of the four sessions on Day 5.

Day 5
General Craving
Time Frame: Baseline
Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (TCQ-SF) is a self-report measure that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions. Each factor scale contains three items. TCQ-SF items were rated on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores vary from 12 to 84, by summing the 12 items and the scores for each factor scale vary from 3 to 21 by summing the three items in each factor scale. A high score indicates high tobacco craving.
Baseline
General Craving
Time Frame: End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (TCQ-SF) is a self-report measure that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions. Each factor scale contains three items. TCQ-SF items were rated on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores vary from 12 to 84, by summing the 12 items and the scores for each factor scale vary from 3 to 21 by summing the three items in each factor scale. A high score indicates high tobacco craving.
End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
General Craving
Time Frame: 1 week follow up
Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (TCQ-SF) is a self-report measure that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions. Each factor scale contains three items. TCQ-SF items were rated on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores vary from 12 to 84, by summing the 12 items and the scores for each factor scale vary from 3 to 21 by summing the three items in each factor scale. A high score indicates high tobacco craving.
1 week follow up
General Craving
Time Frame: 1 month follow up
Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (TCQ-SF) is a self-report measure that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions. Each factor scale contains three items. TCQ-SF items were rated on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores vary from 12 to 84, by summing the 12 items and the scores for each factor scale vary from 3 to 21 by summing the three items in each factor scale. A high score indicates high tobacco craving.
1 month follow up
General Craving
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (TCQ-SF) is a self-report measure that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions. Each factor scale contains three items. TCQ-SF items were rated on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Total scores vary from 12 to 84, by summing the 12 items and the scores for each factor scale vary from 3 to 21 by summing the three items in each factor scale. A high score indicates high tobacco craving.
6 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Baseline
Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) is a self-report measure that is used to assess psychological stress. PSS-4 items were rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with those on the positive subscale scored in reverse and the total score was calculated as a sum of these items. The scores vary from 0-16, with a higher score indicating higher perceived stress.
Baseline
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) is a self-report measure that is used to assess psychological stress. PSS-4 items were rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with those on the positive subscale scored in reverse and the total score was calculated as a sum of these items. The scores vary from 0-16, with a higher score indicating higher perceived stress.
End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 1 week follow up
Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) is a self-report measure that is used to assess psychological stress. PSS-4 items were rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with those on the positive subscale scored in reverse and the total score was calculated as a sum of these items. The scores vary from 0-16, with a higher score indicating higher perceived stress.
1 week follow up
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 1 month follow up
Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) is a self-report measure that is used to assess psychological stress. PSS-4 items were rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with those on the positive subscale scored in reverse and the total score was calculated as a sum of these items. The scores vary from 0-16, with a higher score indicating higher perceived stress.
1 month follow up
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) is a self-report measure that is used to assess psychological stress. PSS-4 items were rated on a Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4, with those on the positive subscale scored in reverse and the total score was calculated as a sum of these items. The scores vary from 0-16, with a higher score indicating higher perceived stress.
6 months follow up
Motivation to Quit Smoking
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants were asked to estimate how motivated they were to quit smoking from 0% to 100%. Τhe possible answers were: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. Higher values reflect greater motivation to quit smoking.
Baseline
Motivation to Quit Smoking
Time Frame: End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Participants were asked to estimate how motivated they were to quit smoking from 0% to 100%. Τhe possible answers were: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. Higher values reflect greater motivation to quit smoking.
End of the treatment (On the fifth day, after completing 20 TMS sessions)
Motivation to Quit Smoking
Time Frame: 1 week follow up
Participants were asked to estimate how motivated they were to quit smoking from 0% to 100%. Τhe possible answers were: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. Higher values reflect greater motivation to quit smoking.
1 week follow up
Motivation to Quit Smoking
Time Frame: 1 month follow up
Participants were asked to estimate how motivated they were to quit smoking from 0% to 100%. Τhe possible answers were: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. Higher values reflect greater motivation to quit smoking.
1 month follow up
Motivation to Quit Smoking
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
Participants were asked to estimate how motivated they were to quit smoking from 0% to 100%. Τhe possible answers were: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. Higher values reflect greater motivation to quit smoking.
6 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexander Sack, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 08.2019CY

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoking Cessation

Clinical Trials on Active intermittent theta burst stimulation

3
Subscribe