Dysphagia, QoL and Attitudes Towards PEG in ALS Patients (ALSDPEG)

Dysphagia, Quality of Life and Attitudes Towards Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

In Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, dysphagia has a high incidence. With deterioration of swallowing function, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is recommended to ensure sufficient and safe oral intake. Dysphagia and PEG placement alter quality of life (QoL). However, QoL and attitudes toward PEG remain largely unexplored. The purpose of this study is to monitor the swallowing function in relationship to QoL and attitudes toward PEG tube insertion and feeding.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to monitor the deterioration of swallowing function in ALS patient population, and to explore its impact on QoL and attitudes toward PEG tube insertion and feeding in the course of the disease. It will take maximum of 60 minutes to fully evaluate the swallowing function and complete the questionnaires. The evaluation procedure will be repeated every 3 months until PEG tube insertion, which will allow us to closely monitor the swallowing function in a relation to attitudes toward PEG and QoL. The data obtained from this study should contribute significantly to the knowledge of QoL in ALS patients with dysphagia, and it will allow for a comparison of QoL in ALS patients with and without PEG tube. This study will also expand the understanding of attitudes in ALS patients and their relatives toward PEG, and the impact of those attitudes on the decision-making process.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will include adult ALS patients able to visit the study site for in-person procedures every 3 months, and their close relatives.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for patients:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • diagnosis of ALS
  • follow-up at University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Division of Neurophysiology, every 3 months
  • be able to visit the study site for in-person procedures every 3 months

Inclusion Criteria for relatives:

  • at least 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria for patients:

  • co-existing illness or disorder that could influence the swallowing function independently of the ALS diagnosis
  • clinically significant cognitive deterioration or dementia at enrollment, as determined by the ALS study neurologist

Exclusion criteria for relatives:

  • signs of probable cognitive deterioration or dementia at enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ALS Patients
Patients with confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
IOPI measures the peak pressure of the tongue strength and endurance using a disposable bulb placed on a hard palate behind the front teeth or at the base of the tongue. The participants will be asked to press the bulb with their tongue with maximum pressure, three times. To measure the endurance, the participants will be asked to hold the pressure for as long as they can.
MASA is a standard clinical swallowing assessment protocol including general patient examination, on-the-outside visible signs of oral preparatory and transportation phase and pharyngeal phase of swallowing function.
The subjects will ingest up to 10 boluses ranging in thickness and volume (from thin to extremely-thick and a cookie).
Respiratory function measurements will include forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), all expressed in percentage of predicted values. Conventional methods of testing will be applied.
Relatives
Close relatives of the patients included in the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
PAS is an 8-point scale used to determine swallowing safety. Levels 1 and 2 are considered safe, levels >3 indicate penetration or aspiration and are considered unsafe.
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Yale Residue Severity Rating Scale (YRSRS) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
YRSRS is a validated measure of swallowing efficiency using an image-based assessment to determine post-swallow pharyngeal residue: location and severity. It is assessed using a 5-point ordinal scale (from 1=0 % residue to 5=50 % residue).
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
IOPI is a device which measures tongue strength (in kilopascals; kPa) and endurance (in seconds) while the participant presses the bulb with the front or the base of their tongue to the hard palate.
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
MASA is a standard clinical swallowing assessment protocol administered by the speech-language therapist. Total score ranges from 38-200. Lower score indicates higher impairment.
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
EAT-10 is a validated self-administered dysphagia severity symptom survey including 10 items and a five-point scale (0=no problem to 4=sever problem). Higher total score indicates higher impairment.
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL) change
Time Frame: At baseline and every 3 months until PEG insertion, 3 and 6 months after PEG insertion
SWAL-QoL is a 44-item standardised psychometric scale that measures swallowing-related QoL across 10 domains. Scores for each individual domain and a total SWAL-QoL score are calculated. Total score ranges from 0-100 (100 indicating the most favourable state).
At baseline and every 3 months until PEG insertion, 3 and 6 months after PEG insertion
Questionnaire on Attitudes Toward PEG Tube Feeding and Insertion Procedure change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
The questionnaire comprises 10 questions. The participants specify their level of agreement on a five-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree).
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
ALSFRS-R is a 12-tem ALS-specific assessment of global functioning using a five-point scale (0=not able, 4= normal ability), with 48 points representing normal function.
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
FOIS is a validated 7-point scale demonstrating an individual's ability of daily oral food intake (1=no oral intake, 7=total oral intake with no restrictions).
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
DOSS is a 7-point scale that rates the functional severity of dysphagia based on objective assessment and provides information on diet recommendations, independence level and type of nutrition necessary (level 7=normal swallowing function, level 1=severe dysphagia).
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
BMI change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Body mass index (in kg/m^2)
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Standard clinical respiratory assessment of FVC (in %)
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Peak Cough Flow (PCF) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Standard clinical respiratory assessment of PCF (in L/min)
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Standard clinical respiratory assessment of MIP (in cmH2)
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP) change
Time Frame: Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)
Standard clinical respiratory assessment of MEP (in cmH2)
Difference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blaž Koritnik, MD, PhD, University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)

3
Subscribe