Using a Robot to Treat Non-specific Low Back Pain (ADAMO)

October 15, 2021 updated by: Fundacion Rioja Salud

Using a Robot to Treat Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Two-arm, Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a musculoskeletal syndrome whose main characteristic is the pain, which is focalized in the lumbar area of the spine, which cannot be attributed to a known cause (traumatism, systemic diseases, nerve root compression, etc). The treatment includes massage and rehabilitation techniques. Here the investigators want to test whether a robot (ADAMO) may help in improving current physiotherapy exercises in reducing back pain. NSLBP patients will be randomly assigned to two arms (robot versus control) and they will receive 10 massage sessions. Pain evaluation will be performed with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The ODI will be performed by an independent physician blind to the treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Low back pain is defined as a musculoskeletal syndrome, or group of symptoms, whose main characteristic is the pain, which is focalized in the lumbar area of the spine. The diagnosis is rather easy since symptoms are very evident. When this pain cannot be attributed to a known cause (traumatism, systemic diseases, nerve root compression, etc), it is called non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), which may represent 90-95% of all cases of back pain.

The treatment for this pathology has been collected in several clinical practice guidelines, with little differences among them. All of them recommend: i) maintaining physical activity as far as the pain allows; ii) pharmacological treatment (analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants); and iii) non-pharmacological measures (local heat, cognitive-behavior therapy, spinal manipulation, rehabilitation programs). Rehabilitation therapy, including different exercises, such as extensions, back workshops, and aquatic exercises, among others, provides excellent results in managing chronic back pain. In addition, physiotherapeutic massage constitutes the most common practice to treat back pain and is very effective in the short term, although it may not address the underlying causes.

The main problem in reporting and measuring physiotherapeutic massage practices is that the massage is applied by different therapists, with different strength and intensity, which may vary from session to session. The use of massaging robotic devices should solve all these problems and several prototypes are already available.

In this study, the efficiency of the new ADAMO robot system (https://adamorobot.com/) will be tested. ADAMO bases its operation on a computer program that controls the manipulator robot, which, and by means of cameras installed at its end, must find in each session the points of treatment in the patient previously defined by the health professional and apply the air at the necessary pressure. This pressure is generated by means of a compressed air nozzle integrated in a handpiece installed at the end of the robot.

Forty-four patients suffering from NSLBP will be recruited after signing the informed consent and randomly assigned to one of two experimental arms: robot or control for 10 sessions. Pain evaluation will be performed with the Oswestry disability index (ODI), which will be applied before starting and at the end of the treatment, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) which will be applied after each session. The ODI will be performed by an independent physician blind to the treatment. Statistical analysis will be performed to compare both treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • La Rioja
      • Logroño, La Rioja, Spain, 26006
        • CIBIR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering non-specific low back pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 or >60 years Pregnant women Impossibility to stay in a prone position Serious systemic pathologies Patients with treatments that may interfere with the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
In the control arm, patients were laid down on the robot platform. Physiotherapists identified the trigger points and the robot was connected, providing the expected noise and vibration, but the air pressure was not applied. Thermotherapy and rehabilitation exercises were provided, as is the standard treatment for NSLBP at the Rehabilitation Service.
Physical therapy provided with or without the help of a robot
Experimental: Robot massage
In the robot arm, a physiotherapist with more than 15 years of experience identified the trigger points in the patient, programmed the robot, and applied robot-controlled air pressure massage for 10 minutes. The ADAMO robot applies an air current to the trigger points on the back of the patient, guided by cameras and computer programs (https://adamorobot.com/). Thermotherapy and rehabilitation exercises were also applied.
Physical therapy provided with or without the help of a robot

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient disability as tested by the Oswestry disability index (ODI).
Time Frame: Through study completion. An average of 6 months.
The ODI will be recorded before starting and at the end of the treatment. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) is a questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. Possible scores go from 0 to 50, being 0 no pain and 50 the highest possible pain.
Through study completion. An average of 6 months.
Perceived pain as tested by the visual analogue scale (VAS).
Time Frame: Through study completion. An average of 6 months.
The VAS will be recorded after every session. The visual analogue scale (VAS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. The patient is presented with a horizontal line of face pictograms. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state, which may rank from 0 (best, no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
Through study completion. An average of 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eduardo Mirpuri, PhD, CIBIR

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FRS-ADAMO-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All results from the study will be published in a specialized journal, including the study protocol, statistical Analysis, informed consent form, and a table with all raw data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be published together with the actual publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Everyone will be able to access all data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-specific Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on ADAMO

3
Subscribe