A Study of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (SPIREA)

April 23, 2024 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with active idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

IIM is considered as a group of rare diseases that is characterized by common features of insidious painless, proximal skeletal muscle weakness, low endurance, and elevated serum muscle enzyme levels. Due to muscle weakness and progressive muscular atrophy, decreasing endurance, internal organ involvement (mainly given the pulmonary, gastrointestinal and cardiac manifestations) and limited therapeutic options, IIM often leads to physical disability and decreased quality of life. Nipocalimab is a fully human aglycosylated immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) designed to selectively bind, saturate, and block the immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding site on the endogenous neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) that binds, salvages, and recycles IgG into circulation or transport IgG across the placenta, following nonspecific pinocytosis into endothelial cells and cells of the reticuloendothelial system. At homeostasis, FcRn recycles IgG to maintain serum IgG levels and extend IgG half-life and also regulates immune cell inflammatory responses to IgG complexes. By targeting the IgG binding site on FcRn, nipocalimab is expected to block the binding and, hence, recycling of IgG, resulting in a decrease in circulating IgG antibody levels, including pathogenic IgG autoantibodies and alloantibodies. Therefore, nipocalimab has potential in the treatment of active IIM by decreasing pathogenic IgG antibody concentrations. The total duration of the study is up to 112 weeks, consisting of 4 study periods: a less than or equal to (<=) 6-week screening period, a 52-week double-blind period, a 48-week long term extension (LTE), and a safety follow-up 8 weeks post last administration of study intervention. Safety assessments include adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), laboratory parameters (hematology and chemistry, including lipid panel), vital signs, and physical examination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

Temporarily not available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6C 2R5
        • Recruiting
        • Lawson Health Research / London Health Sciences Center Research
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3T2
        • Recruiting
        • AMIR Research
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 50
        • Recruiting
        • Revmatologicky ustav
      • Nice Cedex 1, France, 06000
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Pasteur
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière
      • Strasbourg cedex, France, 67091
        • Recruiting
        • Nouvel Hopital Civil
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Completed
        • Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin
      • München, Germany, 80336
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen
      • Rüdersdorf Bei Berlin, Germany, 15562
        • Recruiting
        • Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1023
        • Recruiting
        • Orszagos Mozgasszervi Intezet ORFI Campus
      • Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
        • Recruiting
        • Debreceni Egyetem
      • Ancona, Italy, 60126
        • Recruiting
        • A.O. Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
      • Milano, Italy, 20132
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele HSR
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 810 8563
        • Recruiting
        • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center
      • Fukushima, Japan, 960-1295
        • Recruiting
        • Fukushima Medical University Hospital
      • Kanagawa, Japan, 216-8511
        • Recruiting
        • St Marianna University Hospital
      • Kawachi-Nagano, Japan, 586-8521
        • Recruiting
        • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center
      • Matsudo-shi, Japan, 270-2251
        • Recruiting
        • Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
      • Matsumoto, Japan, 390-8621
        • Recruiting
        • Shinshu University Hospital
      • Sendai-Shi, Japan, 980-8574
        • Recruiting
        • Tohoku University Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan, 113-8603
        • Recruiting
        • Nippon Medical School Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan, 104 8560
        • Recruiting
        • St. Luke's International Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Suwon-si, Korea, Republic of, 16499
        • Recruiting
        • Ajou University Hospital
      • Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico, 14080
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44690
        • Recruiting
        • Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica y Clinica, S.C.
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44160
        • Recruiting
        • Centro Integral en Reumatologia S A de C V
      • México, Mexico, 06700
        • Recruiting
        • CLIDITER S A de C V
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85 168
        • Recruiting
        • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02 637
        • Recruiting
        • Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji im prof dr hab med Eleonory Reicher
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Recruiting
        • Hosp. Univ. de Bellvitge
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Recruiting
        • Hosp. Univ. de La Paz
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Recruiting
        • Hosp. Univ. Marques de Valdecilla
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU
        • Recruiting
        • Western General Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3BG
        • Recruiting
        • University College London Hospitals NHSFT
      • Salford, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Recruiting
        • Salford Royal Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Recruiting
        • Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85251
        • Recruiting
        • HonorHealth Neurology
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Recruiting
        • Attune Health Autoimmune and Inflamation Care and Research
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Recruiting
        • University of California Irvine Medical Center
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502
        • Recruiting
        • Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33487
        • Recruiting
        • FM Clinical Research, LLC South Florida Neurology Associates, P. A.
      • Plantation, Florida, United States, 33324
        • Recruiting
        • Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Recruiting
        • University of South Florida
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Recruiting
        • Augusta University
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Recruiting
        • University of Kansas Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc.
    • Michigan
      • Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States, 48081
        • Recruiting
        • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
        • Completed
        • Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health and Science University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pennsylvania - Perelman School of Medicine
    • South Carolina
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • Completed
        • ACME Research Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Nervie and Muscle Center of Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas at Houston Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Disease classification criteria: Participant meets the diagnostic criteria of probable or definite idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) based on 2017 The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for adult IIM at least 6 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention
  • If a participant is on regular or as needed treatment with low potency topical glucocorticoids (GC) that are allowed in the study or topical tacrolimus (TAC) to treat skin lesions, the dose and frequency should be stable for greater than or equal to (>=) 4 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention as well as maintained at the same dose until Week 52 of the study
  • Antibody positivity criteria: Any 1 of the myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) positive: dermatomyositis (DM): anti-Mi-2 (Mi-2/nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase [NuRD] complex), anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-Gamma (TIF1-Gamma), anti- nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2), anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 activating enzyme; anti- antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA-5) antibodies. Or immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): anti- signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti- 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies. Or anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS): anti- histidyl- ribonucleic acid [tRNA] synthetase (Jo-1), anti- threonyl-tRNA synthetase (PL7), anti- alanyl-tRNA synthetase (PL12), anti- isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (OJ), and anti- glycyl-tRNA synthetase (EJ) antibodies. If all MSAs are negative or more than 1 MSA is positive within different subtypes (defined by the central laboratory) at screening, the tests should be repeated during the screening period. If the same results are observed at retesting, the participant should not be enrolled in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a juvenile myositis diagnosis and now >=18 years old
  • Has cancer-associated myositis defined as cancer diagnosis within 3 years of myositis diagnosis except for cervical carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
  • Has comorbidities (example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) which have required 3 or more courses of oral GC within 1 year prior to screening
  • Has a history of primary immunodeficiency or secondary immunodeficiency not related to the treatment of the participants IIM
  • Has experienced myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke within 12 weeks of screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nipocalimab
Participants will receive Nipocalimab at Week 0 (Baseline) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to Week 50 during double-blind period. Participants on glucocorticoids (GC) at baseline will receive a stable dose of oral GC (prednisone or equivalent) from 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention to Week 0. No changes in GC doses are allowed between Week 0 and Week 24. From Week 24 to Week 44, GC doses will be tapered. No changes to GC doses will be allowed from Week 44 to Week 52. Eligible participants will enter long-term extension (LTE) period and continue receiving Nipocalimab starting from Week 52 up to Week 98 and will be followed up to Week 106.
Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously in double-blind period and LTE period.
Other Names:
  • JNJ-80202135
Prednisone or equivalent will be administered orally as Glucocorticoid.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive Nipocalimab matching placebo at Week 0 (Baseline) and then Q2W up to Week 50 during double-blind period. Participants on GC at baseline will receive a stable dose of oral GC (prednisone or equivalent) from 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention to Week 0. No changes in GC doses are allowed between Week 0 and Week 24. From Week 24 to Week 44, GC doses will be tapered. No changes to GC doses will be allowed from Week 44 to Week 52. Eligible participants will enter LTE period and continue receiving Nipocalimab matching placebo Q2W starting from Week 52 up to Week 98 and will be followed up to Week 106.
Prednisone or equivalent will be administered orally as Glucocorticoid.
Nipocalimab matching placebo will be administered intravenously in double-blind period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 20) in IMACS TIS and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52
Time Frame: At Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS at Week 52 and on <=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (>=) 20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: physicians' global activity, patient global activity (PtGA), manual muscle testing (MMT)-8, muscle enzymes, myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT), and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI). The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS
Time Frame: At Week 24
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Week 24
IMACS TIS
Time Frame: At Week 52
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TIS
Time Frame: At Week 24
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Week 24
Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 52 will be reported. Manual muscle testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.
Baseline and Week 52
IMACS TIS
Time Frame: At Week 24
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TIS
Time Frame: At Week 52
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Major Improvement (>=60) in IMACS TIS
Time Frame: At Weeks 24 and 52
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Major improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=60 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
At Weeks 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in MMT-8 at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 will be reported. Manual Muscle Testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Weeks 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Change from baseline in PhGA at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. Physician Global Activity is a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Global Assessment (Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool [MDAAT]) at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Change from baseline in MDAAT score at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. This is a validated tool which measures the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle. MDAAT is scored on a 10 centimeter (cm) scale ranging from 0-10 cm where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity. Higher score indicates more disease activity.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in Serum Muscle Enzymes Levels at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Change from baseline in serum muscle enzymes levels (creatine kinase [CK], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], and aldolase) at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral Glucocorticoids (GC) Reduction to 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent), Among Participants on Oral GC Greater Than (>) 5 mg/day at Baseline
Time Frame: From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.
From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52
Time Frame: From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on <=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants on <=5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52
Time Frame: From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants on <=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported.
From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve At Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to 5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >5 mg/day at Baseline
Time Frame: From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >5 mg/day at baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52
Time Frame: From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline
Time Frame: At Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >7.5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.
At Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline
Time Frame: From Week 44 through Week 52
Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
From Week 44 through Week 52
IMACS TIS Over Time
Time Frame: Up to 106 weeks
IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Up to 106 weeks
Change From Baseline in the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) Scale Score at Weeks 24 and 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
The CDASI scale is a validated dermatomyositis (DM) specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Change in CDASI Scale Score Over Time
Time Frame: Up to 106 Weeks
The CDASI scale is a validated DM specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.
Up to 106 Weeks
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 106 weeks
Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.
Up to 106 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 106 weeks
Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product; is medically important.
Up to 106 weeks
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)- Physical Function (PF)-20
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52
PROMIS-PF-20 is a participant self-administered 20-item questionnaire assessing the physical function domain. It includes 14 items regarding patients' ability to conduct specific functional activities and 6 items regarding the extent to which their health limits their ability to perform a range of physical activities currently. The 5-point response options for the former items range from 1 "Unable to do" to 5 "Without any difficulty" and the latter items range from 1 "Cannot do" to 5 "Not at all" with higher scores indicating better functioning. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher score indicates better physical function.
Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Functional Disability Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
HAQ-DI score assess functional status of participant. It is 20 question instrument that assess degree of functional disability a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and common activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0=indicating no difficulty, to 3=indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Total HAQ score is average of the computed categories scores ranging from 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Serum Nipocalimab Concentration Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline Up to Week 98
Serum nipocalimab concentration over time will be reported. Serum nipocalimab concentration will be derived using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling.
Baseline Up to Week 98
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay Method
Time Frame: Baseline Up to Week 106
Number of participants with ADA to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.
Baseline Up to Week 106
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (Nabs) to Nipocalimab Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay Method
Time Frame: Baseline Up to Week 106
Number of participants with Nabs to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.
Baseline Up to Week 106

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 2, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR109210
  • 2021-005202-98 (EudraCT Number)
  • 80202135IIM2001 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2023-505314-20-00 (Registry Identifier: EUCT number)
  • 2023-505314-20 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myositis

Clinical Trials on Nipocalimab

3
Subscribe