PSA Versus STN DBS for TD-PD (PSA-STN)

November 24, 2025 updated by: LI DIANYOU, Ruijin Hospital

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Posterior Subthalamic Area (PSA) Versus Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) for Tremor-dominant Parkinson's Disease: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Cross-over Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the deep brain stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) versus the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for the treatment of tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) in a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over manner.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial aiming at comparing the efficacy of PSA and STN DBS in treating tremor-dominant PD. Enrolled patients will undergo bilateral DBS surgery, targeting both PSA and STN with single trajectory. Two months post-implantation, patients enter a 4-month double-blinded crossover phase with PSA and STN DBS in randomized order. After 6 months post-implantation (at the end of the crossover phase), patients enter an open-label phase during which programming parameters are not restricted until the termination of the study at 12-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200025
        • Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • tremor-dominant subtype in the on-medication condition
  • modified Hoehn-Yahr scale of 2 to 4 in the on-medication condition
  • receiving regular anti-parkinsonian drugs for more than 6 weeks
  • good compliance and written informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atypical parkinsonism
  • History of stroke, encephalitis, neuroleptic uses, MRI scan with evidence of significant brain atrophy, lacunar infracts, or other conditions that might interfere with the intracranial surgery
  • Presence of cognitive, or psychiatric or other co-morbidities (e.g., dementia, epilepsy, cranial traumatism, brain tumor, schizophrenia, severe depression or bipolar disorder, personality disorder, etc.) that might interfere with the patient's ability to complete the evaluations or to provide informed consent
  • Presence of anatomical abnormalities in the target region
  • Clinically significant medical history that would increase pre-/post-operative complications
  • Other conditions considered by the investigators that might interfere with the surgery procedure, the follow-ups, and the interpretation of the data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PSA-STN
Participants randomized in this arm will receive bilateral PSA stimulation in the first two months in the randomized phase and then will be crossovered to the bilateral STN stimulation for another two months.
active DBS with optimal stimulating parameters
Experimental: STN-PSA
Participants randomized in this arm will receive bilateral STN stimulation in the first two months in the randomized phase and then will be crossovered to the bilateral PSA stimulation for another two months.
active DBS with optimal stimulating parameters

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the tremor sub-score of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsord Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to 12 months after surgery
up to 12 months after surgery
Change from baseline MDS UPDRS-III to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline MDS UPDRS-III to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Timed up and go test (TUG) to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Timed up and go test (TUG) to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Berg balance scale to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Berg balance scale to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline 39-item Parkinsons disease questionnaire to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline 39-item Parkinsons disease questionnaire to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Levodopa equivalent daily dose to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Levodopa equivalent daily dose to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline maximal phonatory time to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline maximal phonatory time to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline dysphonia severity index to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline dysphonia severity index to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Mini-Mental Status Exam to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Mini-Mental Status Exam to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Beck depression inventory to the end of PSA stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Change from baseline Beck depression inventory to the end of STN stimulation phase in the randomization phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
up to 6 months (4-6 months depending on randomization arm)
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the MDS UPDRS-III in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the Timed up and go test (TUG) in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the Berg balance scale in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
in the off-medication condition
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the levodopa equivalent daily dose in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the beck depression inventory in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the maximal phonatory time in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the dysphonia severity index in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months
Difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the PSA vs STN stimulation period in the Mini-Mental Status Exam in the randomized phase
Time Frame: up to 6 months
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dianyou Li, MD, PhD, Ruijin Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Deep brain stimulation

Subscribe