Non-interventional Study in Pediatric Patients Treated With NOVOCART Inject in the Knee (NINJA)

October 11, 2022 updated by: Tetec AG

Prospective, Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NOVOCART Inject for the Treatment of Cartilage Defects in the Knee in Pediatric Patients With Closed Epiphyses

The study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm non-interventional study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and health economics of NOVOCART® Inject in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee in pediatric patients with radiologically proven closed epiphyseal growth plates.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this non-interventional study NOVOCART® Inject, which is marketed in Germany under a license according to Section 4b of the AMG, will be used in routine clinical practice according to the current authorized Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). As stated in this SmPC, NOVOCART® Inject may only be used by physicians who are trained on the product. The treatment with NOVOCART® Inject requires two surgeries. During the first surgery cartilage tissue will be harvested arthroscopically and sent to TETEC AG for NOVOCART® Inject manufacturing, then NOVOCART® Inject will be transplanted during a second surgery about 3 to 4 weeks later.

All patients will be followed up for 5 years post NOVOCART® Inject implantation and data will be collected preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months as outlined at the end of this synopsis.

NOVOCART® Inject post treatment rehabilitation should follow the recommendations given in the SmPC and during product training.

The primary and secondary variables (see below) will be assessed after a follow-up of 24 month post NOVOCART® Inject implantation (primary analysis).

Long-term data will be assessed after an additional 3 years follow-up (follow-up analysis).

The collected data will be documented using dedicated case report forms (CRFs) which are created by TETEC AG.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cloppenburg, Germany, 49661
        • St. Josefs-Hospital Cloppenburg gemeinnützige GmbH
        • Contact:
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79119
      • München, Germany, 81369
      • München, Germany, 81675
        • Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
        • Contact:
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
        • Contact:
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) with closed epiphyses who suffer from a full-thickness cartilage defect of the knee caused by acute or repetitive trauma or by osteochondrosis dissecans and who are scheduled for treatment with NOVOCART Inject SmPC, where the therapeutic indications, contraindications, special warnings and precautions for use are listed in detail. The decision to treat patients with NOVOCART Inject must be made independently from the patient's participation in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients (< 18 years of age at implantation)
  • Closure of the epiphysis adjacent to the biopsy harvest site or the defect to be treated confirmed by an adequate imaging modality
  • Localized full-thickness cartilage defect (ICRS grade III or IV) of the knee
  • Medicinal indication for NOVOCART® Inject treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

see NOVOCART Inject SmPC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder rate of overall KOOS
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
The overall Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS5) responder rate defined as the proportion of patients with ≥ 10 points improvement in the KOOS5 from baseline.
24-months Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of overall KOOS from baseline
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
Change of overall KOOS from baseline to the 24-month assessment, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, score 0-100, higher score shows better outcome
24-months Follow-up
Change of the 5 sub-scores of the KOOS from baseline
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
Change of the 5 sub-scores of the KOOS from baseline to the 24-month assessment, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, score 0-100, higher score shows better outcome
24-months Follow-up
Change of the IKDC subjective score from baseline
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
Change from baseline to the 24-month visit in the IKDC subjective score, international knee documentation committee, score 0-100, higher score shows better outcome
24-months Follow-up
Change in the IKDC surgeon's part from baseline
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
Change from baseline to the 24-month visit in the IKDC surgeon's part. international knee documentation committee, score 0-100, higher score shows better outcome
24-months Follow-up
MOCART (MRI imaging)
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
In vivo performance measured by the assessment of the Magnetic Resonance, Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue, score 0-100, higher score shows better outcome
24-months Follow-up
IKDC subjective score responder rate
Time Frame: 24-months Follow-up
IKDC subjective score responder rate, defined as the proportion of patients with > 20.5 points improvement in the IKDC subjective score from baseline to the 24-month visit
24-months Follow-up
Proportion of patients with treatment failure
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Proportion of patients with treatment failure
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of postop physical therapy
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of postop physical therapy
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of postop doctor visits
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of postop doctor visits
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Days of hospitalisation
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Days of hospitalisation
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Work/school status checklist
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Work/school status, changes due to injury in work or school status (pupil, worker full or part time, not working, job seeking)
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Days of work/school missed
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Days of work/school missed
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Patient questionnaire, 4 questions with 3 answer choices better, same, worse
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Treatment-related adverse reactions (ARs)
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Treatment-related adverse reactions (ARs)
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Rate of unplanned re-operations
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Rate of unplanned re-operations: all unplanned reoperations and those related to NOVOCART® Inject treatment
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Surgical time
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
cut-to-suture time
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Length of incision
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Length of incision
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse reactions
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Continuous assessment of adverse reactions (ARs)
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of device deficiencies - trephine
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of device deficiencies - trephine
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of device deficiencies - Application System
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of device deficiencies - Application System
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of device deficiencies - number of product related issues
Time Frame: 24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up
Number of device deficiencies - number of product related issues
24-months Follow up, 60-months Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Angele, Prof. Dr., Universitätsklinik Regensburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cartilage Disease

Clinical Trials on NOVOCART Inject

3
Subscribe