Efficacy of Lung and Inferior Vena Cava Sonography for Fluid Optimization

May 27, 2022 updated by: Mansoura University

Efficacy of Lung and Inferior Vena Cava Sonography for Fluid Optimization in Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in trauma patients. As the primary injury cannot be reversed, management strategies must focus on preventing secondary injury by avoiding hypotension and hypoxia and maintaining appropriate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which is a surrogate for cerebral blood flow (CBF). The goal should be euvolemia and avoidance of hypotension. The assessment of a patient's body fluid status is a challenging task for modern clinicians.

The use of Ultrasonography to assess body fluids has numerous advantages. The concept of using lung ultrasound for monitoring the patient is one of the major innovations that emerged from recent studies. Pulmonary congestion may be semiquantified using lung ultrasound and deciding how the patient tolerates fluid. Inferior vena cava (IVC) sonography and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become widely used as a tool to help clinicians prescribe fluid therapy. Common POCUS applications that serve as guides to fluid administration rely on assessments of the inferior vena cava to estimate preload and lung ultrasound to identify the early presence of extravascular lung water and avoid fluid over resuscitation In this study we will use the measurements of both lung and IVC together to guide fluid dosage in critically ill patients with TBI. We will also use ONSD as a mirror for intra-cranial pressure (ICP).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to detect the effectiveness of using IVC and lung ultrasound as bedside tools to ensure euvolemia in patients with traumatic brain injuries

Positive fluid balances have been associated with (angiographic) vasospasm, longer hospital length of stay and poor functional outcomes The assessment of a patient's body fluid status is a challenging task for modern clinicians. Currently, the most accurate method to guide fluid administration decisions uses "dynamic" measures that estimate the change in cardiac output that would occur in response to a fluid bolus. Unfortunately, their use remains limited due to required technical expertise, costly equipment, or applicability in only a subset of patients. Alternatively, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become widely used as a tool to help clinicians prescribe fluid therapy.

International recommendations suggest that the inferior vena cava (IVC) can be assessed to estimate the pressure in the right atrium of non-ventilated patients because of its collapsibility during inspiration. An IVC diameter of < 21mm with collapsibility of > 50% during inspiration suggests normal right atrium pressure (between 0 and 5 mmHg), whereas a diameter of > 21mm with collapsibility of < 50% suggests high pressure (between 10 and 20mmHg). The dynamic method of IVC evaluation, based on the variation in its diameter with respiration, enables the assessment of the potential benefit of fluid administration as a function of IVC compliance.

Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in TBI patients has been shown to correlate with increased ICP and systemic reviews have supported this observation.

In this study, we will use the measurements of both lung and IVC together to guide fluid dosage in critically ill patients with TBI. We will also use ONSD as a mirror for ICP

The study investigates the effect of using bedside sonography in fluid assessment in a critically ill patient

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 050
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI less than 35 kg/m2
  • Diagnosed with traumatic brain injury
  • Glasgow coma score ≥ 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to get consent
  • Presence of Increased intra-abdominal pressure,
  • Presence of acute cor pulmonale
  • Presence of severe right ventricular dysfunction.
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with known pulmonary conditions that interfere with the interpretation of lung ultrasound like pneumectomy; pulmonary fibrosis; persistent pleural effusion
  • Stage 5 chronic kidney disease
  • indication for emergency renal replacement therapy (RRT)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard care (control group)
fluid therapy will be guided by conventional ICU policies to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output

Following 24 hours from admission to the ICU, the standard care will be continued according to conventional ICU protocols

The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment.

All patients will receive the usual care for 24 hours according to ICU policies. The main target is to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output. The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment. Lung sounds, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, urine output, Lactate, haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate values
EXPERIMENTAL: US-guided fluid management (active group)
Fluid therapy will be guided by measurements of lung and IVC sonography
All patients will receive the usual care for 24 hours according to ICU policies. The main target is to maintain an adequate intravascular volume and good urine output. The mean fluid intake will range from (2-3L per day) targeting zero or slightly negative balance (up to - 300ml). Various parameters will be used to attain this goal based on case-by-case clinical judgment. Lung sounds, heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, urine output, Lactate, haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate values
Within 24 hours from admission to the ICU, IVC and lung sonography will be performed every other day and according to their measurements, the volume of fluid therapy will be adjusted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Fluid balance
Time Frame: 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first.
The difference between patient fluid intake and patient fluid output is recorded every 24 h then the cumulative balance is recorded
10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ONSD as mirror for intracranial pressure.
Time Frame: every other day for 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Ultrasonic examination will be performed by an experienced investigator with a 11-3 MHz linear transducer. The patients will be examined in a supine position with the head elevated at 20-30° ONSD was defined as the distance between the external borders of the hyperechoic area 3 mm posterior to the point where the optic nerve entered the globe, using an electronic caliper along the axis perpendicular to the retina. . To minimize intraobserver variability, each measurement was performed three times and the mean value was derived
every other day for 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Urine output
Time Frame: 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
patient urine output per ml is collected and recorded every 6 hours and total daily urine output is recorded
10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Frequency of hypotension
Time Frame: every other day for 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
hypotension is defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure less than 50 mmHg or both or more than 20 % decline in basal blood pressure for more than 5 minutes.
every other day for 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Duration of hypotension
Time Frame: 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
every other day for 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Serum creatinine
Time Frame: 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
daily serum creatinine in mg /dl is ordered and recorded
10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Incidence of pulmonary edema
Time Frame: 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Diagnosis of the patient with pulmonary edema by (x ray, CT, pulse oximetry, other methods) is recorded
10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Length of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Duration of mechanical ventilation in days is record
10 days or until ICU discharge which comes first
Mortality at 10 days
Time Frame: mortality at day 10
mortality at day 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mostafa M Saied, MD, Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
  • Study Director: Medhat M Messeha, MD, assistant professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

June 15, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant individual data for all primary and secondary outcomes will be made available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within 6 months of study completion Data will be available for audits and quantitative meta-analyses for 10 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by an external independent review panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Standard care (control group)

3
Subscribe