- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05437991
Ultrasonographic Morphology Assessment of Low-grade Carotid Stenosis (QUAMUS)
Internal carotid artery (ICA) is intended to supply blood to brain. The carotid bulb located upstream of ICA origin is prone to atherosclerosis. This is an accumulation of fat and calcium in the wall forming a plaque that gradually thickens and leads to carotid stenosis (CS), which causes a decrease in blood flow. The risk of CS is stroke caused either by carotid artery thrombosis (occlusion) or by atherosclerotic plaque fragmentation, some components of which may leak into the brain (embolism).
When diagnosing CS, an Echo-Doppler is performed to determine bulb and ICA origin obstruction rates. The reference method of quantifying CS is based on hemodynamic criteria that only allow the diagnosis of high grade stenosis thresholds (50%-70%). Below 50%, low-grade stenosis, patient follow-up is limited and could be based on morphological criteria; ultrasound imaging being a reference technique for human body structures morphological assessment, especially vessels.
Two methods of CS morphological quantification with Doppler ultrasound currently exist. Calibre reduction at the maximum of stenosis can be measured by relating the smallest luminal diameter to the vessel diameter at stenosis site (ECST method) or to the downstream ICA diameter (NASCET method). As bulb diameter measures ≈1.8 times that of ICA, ECST appears to be more suitable for CS quantification. For high-grade stenosis, morphological quantification performance is impaired due to extensive calcification of large atheromatous plaques. However, it is possible that less calcified nature of low-grade stenosis and the use of a rigorous methodology will allow reproducible assessment in routine practice. This technique has not yet been evaluated, although it is a frequent situation in patient follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Internal carotid artery is intended to supply blood to brain. The carotid bulb located upstream of internal carotid artery origin is prone to atherosclerosis. This is an accumulation of fat and calcium in the wall, forming a plaque which gradually thickens and leads to carotid stenosis, causing a reduction in blood flow. The risk of carotid stenosis is stroke caused either by carotid artery thrombosis (occlusion) or by atherosclerotic plaque fragmentation, some components of which may leak into the brain (embolism).
When carotid stenosis is diagnosed, an Echo-Doppler is performed to determine the bulb and internal carotid artery origin obstruction rates. The reference method for quantifying carotid stenosis is based on hemodynamic criteria that only allow the diagnosis of high grade stenosis thresholds (50%-70%). Below 50%, low-grade stenosis, patient follow-up is limited and could be based on morphological criteria; ultrasound imaging being a reference technique for human body structures morphological assessment, especially vessels.
Two methods of carotid stenosis morphological quantification with Doppler ultrasound currently exist. Calibre reduction at the maximum of stenosis can be measured by relating the smallest luminal diameter to the vessel diameter at stenosis site ("European Carotid Surgical Trial" (ECST), European method) or to the downstream internal carotid artery diameter ("North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial" (NASCET), North American method). As bulb diameter measures ≈1.8 times that of the internal carotid artery, the NASCET appears to be more suitable for carotid stenosis quantification. For high-grade stenosis, morphological quantification performance is impaired due to extensive calcification of large atheromatous plaques. However, it is possible that less calcified nature of low-grade stenosis and the use of a rigorous methodology will allow reproducible assessment in routine practice.
This technique has not yet been evaluated although it is a frequent situation in patient follow-up. This study therefore suggests to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of morphological quantification of these stenosis by the ECST method with a precise methodology.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Var
-
Toulon, Var, France, 83100
- Hôpital Sainte Musse
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Outpatient referred for Echo-Doppler exploration of the neck vessels
- Patient 18 years of age or older
- Atheromatous arterial disease with stenosis < 50% (maximum systolic velocity < 125 cm/sec for an angle of 50-60°) in at least one carotid artery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal
- Unavailability of two physicians to perform examination
- Patient under judicial protection (guardianship, curators...) or justice safeguard
- Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman
- Any other reason that could interfere with study objectives evaluation in the investigator opinion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Morphological quantification of low-grade carotid stenosis
Morphological quantification using ECST method and implying two independent observers
|
The physician who is usually in charge of patient follow-up performs a first evaluation of carotid stenosis percentage by echo-doppler using ECST method.
Then a second physician immediately performs a second evaluation using the same echo-doppler device without knowing first evaluation conclusions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of morphological quantification of low-grade carotid stenosis (<50%) using the ECST method
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Each operators will perform stenosis percentage calculation according to ECST method.
Between the two calculations performed independently by the two observers, a difference of ±10% will be considered acceptable.
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To assess the performance of morphological quantification technique according to examination feasibility (good, medium, poor).
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The examination feasibility will be based on subjective assessment of the conditions under which the measurements are made (systolic and diastolic velocities in the internal carotid artery, diameter of the patent lumen, diameter of the vessel at the site of stenosis):
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Frédéric GIAUFFRET, MD, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-CHITS-005
- 2022-A00854-39 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Carotid Stenosis
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRecruitingCarotid Artery Plaque | Carotid Artery Diseases | Carotid Artery Stenosis Asymptomatic | Carotid Artery StenosisGermany
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingChanghai Hospital; Peking Union Medical College Hospital; The Second Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCarotid Artery Stenting | Carotid Endarterectomy | Best Medical Treatment | Carotid Artery Stenosis AsymptomaticChina
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingRadiation-induced Carotid Artery StenosisChina
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneHôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-Franc OuestNot yet recruiting
-
Ochsner Health SystemWithdrawnTCD | Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis | Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis | HITSUnited States
-
University of BolognaActive, not recruiting
-
W.L.Gore & AssociatesCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and other collaboratorsRecruitingCarotid Atherosclerosis | Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis | Carotid Artery AtheromaUnited States
-
Aesculap AGEnrolling by invitationCarotid Artery Stenosis | Iliac Artery Stenosis | Femoral Artery StenosisGermany
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingPatients With Any Degree of Carotid Artery Stenosis and Vulnerable Features in the Carotid Artery PlaqueUnited States
Clinical Trials on Independent morphological quantifications by echo-doppler using ECST method
-
Medical University of WarsawCompletedAtrial Fibrillation Fluttering
-
Samara State Medical UniversityRecruitingEndothelial Dysfunction | Cardiotoxicity | Acute Myeloid Leukemia, AdultRussian Federation