- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05447806
Diabetes Clinical Decision Support
September 12, 2023 updated by: Ariana Pichardo-Lowden, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Glucose Management Clinical Decision Support to Improve Outcomes in Academic and Community Hospitals
The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of an electronic medical record clinical decision support tool on rates of dysglycemia in the hospital, and its clinical and economical outcomes.
The study also evaluates the perspectives of providers regarding the tool's usefulness on disease management support, knowledge, and practice performance.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Approximately 9 million patients with diabetes (DM) are hospitalized annually and over 30% of inpatients without DM experience high glucose (HG) due to their acute illness.
HG increases the risk of infectious and non- infectious complications and death, hospital length of stay (LOS), utilization of hospital resources and overall healthcare costs.
While glucose control reduces these risks, controlling HG in the hospital is difficult due to multiple barriers such as recognizing and proactively treating glucose abnormalities, and adequately ordering insulin to treat HG in the hospital.
Clinical decision support (CDS) is a system that uses computerized person- specific data in the electronic medical record (EMR) proven to improve hospital care.
Among the various modalities, alert-CDS is shown to improve care delivery, providers' proactivity, and glucose control specifically in intensive care settings of academic institutions.
However, alert-CDS has not yet been studied outside of intensive care units (ICU), or in community hospitals where most patients receive care.
Furthermore, its impact on patients' outcomes has not been tested in any setting.
The proposed project uses an innovative alert-CDS tool the investigators developed and validated which automatically identifies dysglycemia and inadequacies in insulin administration in the hospital.
It alerts clinicians with recommendations to support decision making without superseding their clinical judgement.
In the pilot study, it was found that this alert-CDS tool reduced recurrent high glucose levels and shortened LOS.
Based on this promising preliminary data, in this project the investigators propose to study the impact of our CDS tool on clinical, economic and providers' performance outcomes among non-intensive care patients both in an academic and a community hospital.
This resource will be available intermittently in the EMR every 3 months during 36 months, thus allowing the comparison of 18 months of intervention and 18 months of standard care.
Based on the pilot study, a sample size of 12,560 subjects will give an 80% power of detecting 0.34 days (~ 8 hours) difference in length of stay, the primary endpoint of our study.
The investigators propose the following aims: Aim 1) To determine the impact of the alert-CDS over conventional care on the clinical outcomes of non-ICU patients in an academic and a community hospital.
Aim 2) To determine the impact of the alert-CDS over conventional care on the economic outcomes of non-ICU patients in an academic and a community hospital.
Aim 3) To determine the impact of alert-CDS for inpatient glycemic control on providers' perspectives, competencies and practice performance between an academic and a community hospital.
It is hypothesized that the tool will increase providers' knowledge about dysglycemia allowing them to make better decisions about insulin administration.
The anticipated success of our study builds upon a well-established multidisciplinary team of investigators strongly supported by leadership stakeholders in both hospitals.
The proposed study has the potential of establishing a new paradigm in the management of dysglycemia in hospitalized patients with a major positive impact on clinical and economic outcomes.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
15732
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Kalen Coordinator, MS
- Phone Number: 281452 7175310003
- Email: kkearcher@pennstatehealth.psu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
- Recruiting
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Kalen Coordinator, MS
- Phone Number: 717-531-0003
- Email: kkearcher@pennstatehealth.psu.edu
-
Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19605
- Recruiting
- Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Franciss Quigley, MD
- Phone Number: 610-378-2440
- Email: fquigley@pennstatehealth.psu.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hospitalized adult (>18 years) patients at Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hampden Medical Center, and Holy Spirit Medical Center
- Ambulatory adult (>18 years) patients at Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center
- Trigger of an alert or a disease management message
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children (<18 years)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Active Inpatient Diabetes Clinical Decision Support
The Active arm consists of participants treated during the "ON" phase of the GlucAlert-CDS tool.
The tool operates through an automated process of rules embedded in the EMR recognizing hypoglycemia (established or impending); recurrent hyperglycemia (in type 1 and 2 DM, or stress hyperglycemia-SH); and inappropriate insulin use (sliding scales monotherapy if recurrent hyperglycemia in type 2 DM or SH, or any time in type 1 DM).
If the tool's criteria are met, an alert in the EMR will notify the provider with the clinically recommended treatment.
|
This prospective intervention will be carried out over 36 months and encompass 12 alternating GlucAlert-CDS phases lasting 3 months each.
Six active phases (ON period) and six inactive phases (OFF period) will represent 18 months of intervention and control respectively.
GlucAlert-CDS recognizes gaps in care denoting the automatic process of subjects' identification and inclusion.
During the ON period, gap in care events detected in patients' EMR will evoke alert messages and care recommendations for clinicians in real time for their consideration.
These notifications are programmed to be delivered to primary inpatient providers in direct care of these hospitalized patients.
During the OFF period, the program will record the gaps in care events detected, but alerts will be inactive for providers' viewing.
|
No Intervention: Inactive Inpatient Diabetes Clinical Decision Support
The Inactive arm consists of participants treated during the "OFF" phase of the GlucAlert-CDS Tool.
Alerts will not be sent to provider's
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Average hospital length of stay (LOS)
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 6 weeks
|
Number of days in the hospital
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of gap in care events
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of events recognized for: 1) Hyperglycemia: recurrent hyperglycemia [>= 180/dl at least twice] or severe hyperglycemia [>= 250 mg/dl at least once] 2) Hypoglycemia: established hypoglycemia [<= 70 mg/dl] or impending hypoglycemia [71-80 mg/dl] 3)Inappropriate insulin use: among type 2 diabetes and stress hyperglycemia patients [sliding scale monotherapy when recurrent hyperglycemia present] or among type 1 diabetes [sliding scale monotherapy any time].
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Glycemic control parameters - average glucose per admission
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Glucose value in mg/dl
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Glycemic control parameters - average glucose per day per admission
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of glucose values within the following categories: severe hypoglycemia (<= 40 mg/dl), moderate hypoglycemia (41-70 mg/dl), within normal limits but not desired (71-110 mg/dl), within target/less commonly recommended (111-140 mg/dl), within target (141-180 mg/dl), mild hyperglycemia (181-220 mg/dl), moderate hyperglycemia (221-300 mg/dl), severe hyperglycemia (>=301 mg/dl).
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Glycemic control parameters - glycemic variability
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Standard deviation
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Incidence of inpatient mortality
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of deceased patients
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Incidence of post-discharge mortality
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after discharge
|
Number of deceased patients
|
Up to 3 months after discharge
|
Proportion of hospital-acquired infections
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of infections: 1)Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) 2)Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) 3)Clostridium difficile colitis 4)MRSA infections 5)Central Line associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) 6)Bacteremia
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Proportion of surgical complications
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of complications: 1)Wound dehiscence 2)Seroma 3)Surgical site infection 4)Acute organ rejection
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Proportion of medical complications
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of complications: 1)Diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA) 2)Sepsis 3)Severe sepsis 4)Septic shock 5)Decubitus ulcers 6)Deep venous thromboembolism 7)Pulmonary embolism.
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Proportion of safety events
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of events: 1)DKA diagnosis in type 1 diabetes after sliding scale insulin monotherapy gap in care event notification 2)Sever hypoglycemia (glucose level <= 40 mg/dl) after any hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia gap in care event notification 3)Fall occurred during hospitalization.
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Frequency of severity of illness
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of cases during hospitalization: Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) SOI categories 1, 2, 3, and 4.
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Proportion of diabetes medication optimization at the transition of care
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of participants: Patients with A1c > 8% having their diabetes treatment adjusted upon discharge, defined as a preadmission diabetes treatment changed to include additional medications (insulin, oral or non-insulin injectable agents).
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Average reduction of glycohemoglobin level within 12 months of discharge
Time Frame: up to 12 months after being discharged from the hospital
|
Percent level reduction: Glycohemoglobin reduction in relation to level prior to admission among patients who continue to follow with the health system
|
up to 12 months after being discharged from the hospital
|
Frequency of hospital readmission
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after being discharged from the hospital
|
Number of admissions: Admission within 7, 14, and 30 days from discharge.
|
Up to 30 days after being discharged from the hospital
|
Frequency of Intensive Care unit (ICU) transfers
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of transfers: Refers to admission to ICU transferred from non-ICU units
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Cost of hospitalization
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Log-transformed amount of hospital submitted claims
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Frequency of post-hospitalization skilled care needed from home to more advanced care
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of discharges higher than preadmission level of care: defined as discharge to more advanced care than previous to admission such as a) Inpatient advanced care facilities, b) rehabilitation, c) nursing home care.
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Frequency of post-hospitalization skilled care needed
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of discharges higher than preadmission level of care: defined as discharge to more advanced care than previous to admission such as a) Inpatient advanced care facilities, b) rehabilitation, c) nursing home care.
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Frequency of utilization of consulting services resource
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number of consults to diabetes services (endocrinology, diabetes education, hospitalists).
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Hospital revenue
Time Frame: Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Number in category of DRG for expected reimbursement
|
Duration of hospital admission, up to 3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Provider's perspective
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
5-point Likert scale responses of 1)Usefulness of CDS managing glucose issues 2)Importance of CDS in hospital diabetes care 3)Support of the CDS in own decision making 4)Sense of work disruption caused by the CDS messages 5)Sense of notification fatigue caused by the CDS messages.
Providers will respond with their level of agreement to each question on a 5-point scale (from 1 - Strongly Disagree to 5 - Strongly Agree).
|
Up to 24 months
|
Provider's knowledge
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Multiple choice questions correct responses: Refers to question on contextual and biomedical knowledge
|
Up to 24 months
|
Provider's decision making
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Proportion of correct responses: Clinical vignettes representing common clinical scenario of glucose management in the hospital
|
Up to 24 months
|
Provider's practice performance
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Number of insulin treatment adjustments.
|
Up to 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ariana Pichardo-Lowden, MD, Penn State College of Medicine
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 15, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 14, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 1, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
July 7, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 13, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2023
Last Verified
September 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00012931/20607
- 1R01DK130992-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hyperglycemia
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedHospital Hyperglycemia | Post-transplant HyperglycemiaUnited States
-
Zealand University HospitalNot yet recruitingStress Hyperglycemia | Postoperative Hyperglycemia
-
University of CopenhagenUnknownSurgery--Complications | Hyperglycemia Stress | Hyperglycemia Steroid-inducedDenmark
-
University of LeedsCompletedEffect of Food on Postprandial HyperglycemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); National...RecruitingHyperglycemia StressUnited States
-
Loughborough UniversityUniversity of BedfordshireCompletedPostprandial HyperglycemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconEli Lilly and Company; AstraZenecaCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaCompleted
-
Addis Ababa UniversityCompletedHyperglycemia, Postprandial
-
University of Eastern FinlandFinnsugar LtdCompletedHyperglycemia, PostprandialFinland
Clinical Trials on Active Electronic Medical Record Inpatient Diabetes Clinical Decision Support
-
Children's National Research InstituteNot yet recruitingPain | Fractures, Bone | Appendicitis | Bias, Racial
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaCompleted
-
Kenya Medical Research InstituteUnknown
-
Brittany LapinLearning Health Systems Rehabilitation Research NetworkRecruitingPhysical Therapy EvaluationUnited States
-
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustActive, not recruitingStroke | Atrial FibrillationUnited Kingdom
-
Kaiser PermanenteCompletedPulmonary EmbolismUnited States
-
University of AarhusDanish Cancer Society; TrygFonden, DenmarkWithdrawnChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Metastatic CancerDenmark
-
Seattle Children's HospitalCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Not yet recruitingPreDiabetes | Lifestyle, Healthy | Activation, Patient
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; RAND; Agency... and other collaboratorsRecruitingUrinary IncontinenceUnited States