Intensive Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation and Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease

July 7, 2022 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Effects of Intensive Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation and Identification of New Biomarkers in Response to an Integrated Motor-Cognitive and Aerobic Exercises Approaches in People With Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms such as rigidity, bradykinesia, resting tremor, cognitive and autonomic dysfunctions, gait and balance difficulties.

The impairment of gait, balance and cognitive performances is partially responsive to dopaminergic medications. This emphasizes the importance of non-pharmacological interventions for people with PD (pwPD).

Intensive multidisciplinary motor and cognitive rehabilitation has been proposed as a complementary and effective treatment for managing pwPD.

Several structural and physiological mechanisms have been suggested to underpin exercise-induced neuroplastic changes in PD, such as enhanced synaptic strength and preservation of dopamine neurons. To date, studies on brain changes induced by motor and cognitive exercises in pwPD have been small-scaled and uncontrolled.

Identifying accessible and measurable biomarkers for monitoring the events induced by intensive motor and cognitive rehabilitation program would help in testing the treatment effectiveness and would allow personalization of rehabilitation strategies by predicting patients' responsiveness.

Based on validated clinical assessments of intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment, the project will test the ability of a new set of biomarkers to evaluate rehabilitative outcomes in a cohort of people with PD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

While pharmacological treatment is helpful in the early stages of the disease, increased attention has been given to rehabilitation that may lead to clinical improvements in motor and non-motor impairments.

Recently synthesized evidence suggests that physical exercise may lead to neuroplastic changes at the functional, structural and molecular levels.

Accessible and measurable biomarkers are needed to monitor the disease progression and the neurobiological changes resulting from pharmacological and rehabilitative treatments, also can be a useful and valuable tool to test rehabilitation effectiveness.

The present project will start from the reliable clinical assessment of rehabilitation effectiveness of an intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, to verify the ability of a new panel of measurable biomarkers to assess neurobiological and functional changes in pwPD.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of an intensive multidisciplinary, aerobic, motor-cognitive rehabilitation treatment on accessible and measurable molecular biomarkers (primary outcome); balance and gait performance; aerobic capacity; motor and non-motor symptoms; cognitive functions; neuroimaging biomarker (secondary outcomes) in comparison to an active control group receiving a home-based self-treatment program. Thereafter, the investigators aim to relate the effects seen in motor and "non-motor" behavior to changes in biomolecular and neuroimaging markers.

To achieve this purpose, the study is designed as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and participants will be recruited at Fondazione Don C. Gnocchi-ONLUS, IRCCS S. Maria Nascente. Seventy-two subjects with a diagnosis of PD in accordance of MDS criteria will be randomly allocated to the experimental (EXP) or control group (CTR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20148
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS S. Maria Nascente, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mario Meloni, MD; PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francesca Lea Saibene, M.Sc.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Davide Cattaneo, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thomas Bowmann, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Denise Anastasi, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marco Rabuffetti, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Maurizio Ferrarin, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tiziana Lencioni, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Cristina Agliardi, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Franca Guerini, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mario Clerici, MD; PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francesca Baglio, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laura Pelizzari, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PD diagnosis according to MDS Criteria (MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease, Postuma et al., 2015);
  • Modified Hoehn&Yahr (H&Y): stages from 1.5 to- 3;
  • Stable pharmacological treatment in the last 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vascular, familiar and drug- induced forms of parkinsonism, other known or suspected causes of parkinsonism (metabolic, brain tumor etc) or any suggestive features of atypical parkinsonism;
  • Significant comorbidities and/or severe systemic diseases that would preclude exercise participation (eg.recent surgery, unstable cardiac dysfunction, anemia, hepatosis, pulmonary disorders, chronic renal failure; auditory, visual and/or vestibular dysfunctions, presence of DBS); previously diagnosed psychiatric diseases.
  • Dementia as defined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA Test) Correct Score<15.51 (Santangelo et al., 2014);
  • Rehabilitation treatment in the previous 4 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intensive Outpatient Integrated Motor-Cognitive and Aerobic Exercises Rehabilitation Program
Intervention of highly challenging motor and cognitive training for 6 consecutive weeks.

The rehabilitation program will last for 6 consecutive weeks and involves the execution of 30 sessions, 5 days a week lasting 160 '/ day each (80' motor; 40 'cognitive and 40' speech therapy rehabilitation) for 3 days a week and 180'/ day (80 'motor; 60' cognitive and 40 'speech therapy rehabilitation) for 2 days a week. The EXP group will receive 18 sessions (3 times a week) of treadmill (20 min), balance exercises and functional reinforcement (20 min). The remaining motor sessions will be defined based on the patient's therapeutic needs.

The cognitive treatment will be proposed both in traditional mode (3 times a week) and through the support of semi-immersive "Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System" (VRRS) (2 times/week). The VRRS treatment is structured in 2 sessions per week (60 min) for 6 consecutive weeks.

The speech therapy program will include clinical and instrumental evaluations and innovative techniques will be used for the treatment (biofeedback with Vitalstim).

Active Comparator: Home-Based Stretching Exercises
Home-based self-treatment program for 40 '/ day for 6 consecutive weeks
The control group subjects will undergo a home-based self-treatment program for 40 '/ day for 6 consecutive weeks consisting of muscle-stretching and active mobilization exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum biomarkers in neuron derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs)
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Oligomeric α-synuclein (α-syn) ng/ml; SNARE complex: Syntaxyn-1(STX-1A) (ng/ml), VAMP-2 (ng/ml) and SNAP-25 (ng/ml); Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) (ng/ml), pro-BDNF (ng/ml), Glial cell line-derived Neurotrophic factor (GDNF) (ng/ml) Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) (ng/ml)
18 weeks
Blood Biomarkers
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Pro- [IL-1β (pg/ml), Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNFα) (pg/ml), Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) (pg/ml), IL-6 (pg/ml), IL-18 (pg/ml)], Anti-inflammatory (IL-10) (pg/ml) cytokines.
18 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: 18 weeks
- Timed-Up and -Go Test (TUG); subjects are asked to rise from a standard armchair, walk to a marker 3 m away, turn, walk back, and sit down again. The Time (seconds) is measured.
18 weeks
Aerobic capacity and endurance
Time Frame: 18 weeks
6 Minute Walk Test (6-MWT). The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
18 weeks
Gait speed
Time Frame: 18 weeks
10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) assess walking speed in meters per second over a distance of 6 meters.
18 weeks
Strenght
Time Frame: 18 weeks
5-Time Sit-To-Stand (5TSTS) is based on the amount of time (in seconds) a patient is able to transfer from a seated to a standing position and back to sitting five times.
18 weeks
Balance
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI): The mDGI measure balance skills consists of 8 items and results in a total score of 0 to 64.
18 weeks
Gait Analysis
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Gait analysis will be assessed using a 9-camera SMART-D motion capture system (BTS, Milano, Italy) in order to measure stride length, step width and length, kinematic data and energy recovery.
18 weeks
Motor and non-motor symptoms
Time Frame: 18 weeks

The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part I-IV.

MDS-UPDRS-PART I ''nonmotor experiences of daily living -nM-EDL-" range: 0-52, 0=better outcome, 52=worse outcome; PART-II ''motor experiences of daily living -M-EDL-'' range: 0-52, 0=better outcome, 52=worse outcome; PART-III ''motor examination'' range: 0-132, 0=better outcome, 132=worse outcome; PART IV ''motor complications'' range: 0-24, 0=better outcome, 24=worse outcome.

18 weeks
Non-Motor symptoms
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) [range: 0-360, 0=better outcome, 360=worse outcome];
18 weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS) [range: 1-5, 1=better outcome, 5=worse outcome];
18 weeks
Daytime sleepiness
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [range: 0-24, 0=better outcome, 24=worse outcome];
18 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [range: 0-21, 0=better outcome, 21=worse outcome];
18 weeks
Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder
Time Frame: 18 weeks
REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire (RBDSQ) [range: 0-13, 0=better outcome, 13=worse outcome].
18 weeks
Autonomic Symptoms
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Italian version of the Composite Autonomic Symptoms Score (COMPASS-31) [weighted score range: 0-100, 0=better outcome, 100=worse outcome];
18 weeks
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [range: 0-10, 0=better outcome, 10=worse outcome];
18 weeks
Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality of life
Time Frame: 18 weeks
The Parkinson Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) [PDQ-39 range: 0%-100%; 0%=better outcome, 100%=worse outcome].
18 weeks
Global Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA Test)[0-30, 0=worse, 30=better outcome] and Mini-Mental Parkinson (MMP)[0-32, 0=worse, 32=better outcome]
18 weeks
Verbal short-term and working memory
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Forward and Backward Verbal Span [0-9, 0=worse, 9=better outcome]
18 weeks
Verbal episodic memory
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Immediate and delayed story recall test [0-8, 0=worse, 8=better outcome; Oblivion Index range: 0-8, 0=worse, 8=better outcome]
18 weeks
Visuo-constructional ability
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Rey's Figure - Copy [0-36, 0=worse, 36=better outcome]
18 weeks
Visuo-spatial memory
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Rey's Figure - Recall [0-36, 0=worse, 36=better outcome]
18 weeks
Frontal lobe functioning
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) [0-18, 0=worse, 18=better outcome]
18 weeks
Non-verbal reasoning
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM-47) [0-36, 0=worse, 36=better outcome]
18 weeks
Extradimensional verbal set-shifting
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Alternate Verbal Fluency [0-∞, 0=worse, ∞=better outcome;Shifting Index 0-1, 0=worse, 1=better outcome]
18 weeks
Extradimensional non-verbal set-shifting
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Trail Making Test (TMT) [0-∞, 0=worse, ∞=better outcome]
18 weeks
Speed information processing
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (Oral Version) [0-120, 0=worse, 120=better outcome]
18 weeks
Cognitive interference inhibition
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Stroop Test-Short Version [Error: 0-30, 0=better, 30=worse outcome;Time: range: 0-∞, 0=better, ∞=worse outcome]
18 weeks
IdeoMotor praxis
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Gesture Imitation Test (IMA-T) [0-72, 0=worse, 72=better outcome]
18 weeks
Language production and non-motor processing speed
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Verbal fluency test (phonemic and semantic tasks) [0-∞, 0=worse, ∞=better outcome]
18 weeks
Depression
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) [0-63, 0=better, 63=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Anxiety
Time Frame: 18 weeks
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Forma Y (STAI-Y) [20-80; STAI-Y TRAIT ANXIETY range: 20-80; 20=better, 80=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Apathy
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Dimensional Apathy Scale (I-DAS) [0-72, 0=better, 72=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Anhedonia
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) [0-14, 0=better, 14=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Impulsivity
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) [30-120, ;30=better, 120=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Alexithymia
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) [20-100, 20=better, 100=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Impulsive Control Disorders
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's disease (QUIP-RS-IT) [0-112,; 0=better, 112=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Behavioral disturbances
Time Frame: 18 weeks
NeuroPsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) [SE: 0-36, 0=better, 36=worse outcome; ST= 0-60, 0=better, 60=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Functional disability
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Modified Barthel Index (MBI) [range: 0-100, 0=worse outcome, 100=better outcome];
18 weeks
Daily self-care activities
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) [0-6, 0=worse, 6=better outcome] Instrumental Activities Of Daily Living (IADL) [0-8, 0=worse, 8=better outcome]
18 weeks
Caregiver burden
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) [range 0-96, 0=better, 96=worse outcome]
18 weeks
Brain functional connectivity
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-3 Tesla protocols, including resting state functional MRI to assess the neural correlates of rehabilitation-induced brain plasticity in pwPD undergoing intensive motor and cognitive rehabilitation.
18 weeks
Cerebral blood flow
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Advanced MRI-3 Tesla protocols, including arterial spin labeling (ASL) to assess the neural correlates of rehabilitation-induced brain plasticity in pwPD undergoing intensive motor and cognitive rehabilitation.
18 weeks
Home-based motor activity monitoring
Time Frame: 18 weeks
The acquisitions will be obtained from the actigraphs (mounted one on the right wrist and the other on the left wrist).
18 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mario Meloni, MD;PhD, IRCCS S. Maria Nascente, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pathologic Processes

Clinical Trials on Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation

3
Subscribe