- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05453019
Effects of CI on Tinnitus and Its Symptoms
Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Tinnitus and Its Symptoms
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Research content 1.1 Study on the change law of tinnitus affected by electrical stimulation after electrode implantation: 1) The change of tinnitus before operation after cochlear implantation; 2) Long term observation of electrical stimulation after cochlear implantation: (1) The change rule of tinnitus loudness after electrical stimulation (how long can it recover to be stable after power on); (2) The regularity of tinnitus frequency after electrical stimulation; (3) The recovery of tinnitus after electrode implantation for various causes of deafness.
1.2 Study on the mechanism of electric stimulation inhibiting tinnitus: 1) Changes of resting EEG in patients with tinnitus before surgery, before surgery-after surgery, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 month, more than 12 months; 2) The compilation of resting electroencephalogram analysis program; 3) The resting brain wave shape was analyzed to trace the anatomical position of the artificial cochlea to inhibit tinnitus.
1.3 Study on the optimal setting of electrode stimulation for tinnitus treatment: 1) Setting different electric stimulation frequency and stimulation rate parameters to mask tinnitus; 2) Set the procedure of electric stimulation cochlear implant to mask tinnitus.
- Research objectives 1) Summarize the changes of tinnitus after electrode implantation (effective treatment time, diseases suitable for electrical stimulation treatment, etc.); 2) Infer the mechanism of electric stimulation inhibiting tinnitus; 3) Set electrical stimulation parameters to effectively suppress tinnitus.
- Scientific problems to be solved Our study group plan to use more advanced EEG technology to explore the principle of electric stimulation to suppress tinnitus, find out the effective scheme of electric stimulation to treat tinnitus, and help more patients solve the problem of tinnitus.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: QIAN WANG, M.S.
- Phone Number: +8618211068103
- Email: only_elizabeth@126.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Shi m Yang
- Phone Number: 01068159050
- Email: yangsm301@263.net
Study Locations
-
-
France
-
Beijing, France, China, 100085
- Recruiting
- Qian Wang
-
Contact:
- QIAN WANG
- Phone Number: +8618211068103
- Email: only_elizabeth@126.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. This study included patients who received cochlear implants at the Auditory Implant Center of the Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, China PLA General Hospital;
- 2. The patients ranged from 16 to 90 years old;
- 3. The patient experienced hearing loss and had either tinnitus longer than 0.25 years (experimental group 1) or no tinnitus (control group 2) before the cochlear implant surgery;
- 4. The cochlear implants accepted by patients included products from MED-EL, Cochlear, Advanced Bionics and Nurotron;
- 5. All patients voluntarily participated in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1 Tinnitus types exclude non otogenic tinnitus (including tinnitus caused by hypertension, heart disease, hyperthyroidism, neurasthenia, hyperlipidemia, etc.);
- 2 Contraindications of cochlear implant surgery (refer to the guidelines for cochlear implant 2013 of the Chinese Medical Association);
- 3 Intellectual deficiency
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: tinnitus group
Patients who have tinnitus got cochlear implant
|
The surgeon will make a small cut (incision) behind patient's ear, and form a small hole in the portion of skull bone (mastoid) where the internal device rests.
Then the surgeon create a small opening in the cochlea in order to thread the electrode of the internal cochlear implant device.
The skin incision is stitched closed so that the internal device is under the skin.
|
Active Comparator: without tinnitus group
Patients who have no tinnitus got cochlear implant
|
The surgeon will make a small cut (incision) behind patient's ear, and form a small hole in the portion of skull bone (mastoid) where the internal device rests.
Then the surgeon create a small opening in the cochlea in order to thread the electrode of the internal cochlear implant device.
The skin incision is stitched closed so that the internal device is under the skin.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 1 week after operation
|
Stimulating basement membrane with cochlear implant electrode to match tinnitus frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
1 week after operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
1 month after operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 2 months after operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
2 months after operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 3 months after CI operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
3 months after CI operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
4 months after operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 7 months after operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
7 months after operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: 13 months after operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
13 months after operation
|
Electrical stimulation channel number
Time Frame: over 13 months after operation
|
frequency.
The cochlear implant electrode number is recorded.
|
over 13 months after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
Pre-operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
1 week after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
1 month after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 months after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
2 months after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
3 months after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
4 months after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 7 months after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
7 months after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: 13 months after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
13 months after operation
|
Tinnitus characteristic information questionnaire
Time Frame: over 13 months after operation
|
A multifactorial and closed-ended questionnaire was developed by our CI center.
The demographics and part of the tinnitus descriptions were recorded in Tinnitus Characteristics questionnaire for CI recipients.
The patients' basic information, such as gender, age, aetiology, CI side, CI type, and time of deafness was completed by patients.
Tinnitus characteristics information, including localization, duration, and type was collected for correlation analysis.
|
over 13 months after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 1 week after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
1 week after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
1 month after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 2 months after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
2 months after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 3 months after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
3 months after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
4 months after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 7 months after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
7 months after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: 13 months after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
13 months after operation
|
Tinnitus loudness(CI electrical stimulation intensity)
Time Frame: over 13 months after operation
|
The tinnitus loudness was matched by the stimulation current level of cochlear implant electrode, The ultimate electrode stimulation current (IµA) is quantified in µA and the tinnitus loudness is recorded in Qtin (nC, 10-9C) (i.e.
Qtin=IµA* tp).
|
over 13 months after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: Pre-operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
Pre-operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 1 week after operation
|
The EEG waveforms of CI patients were tested, and the amplitude and latency were recorded.
|
1 week after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
1 month after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 2 months after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
2 months after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 3 months after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
3 months after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
4 months after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 7 months after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
7 months after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: 13 months after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
13 months after operation
|
Objective electroencephalography-based assessment(EEG)
Time Frame: over 13 months after operation
|
EEG is a non-invasive objective assessment technique that records brain activity along with specific neural pathways.
we utilize cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and event-related potentials(ERP) to obtain time-domain analysis.
|
over 13 months after operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: Pre-operation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
Pre-operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: 1 months after operation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
1 months after operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: 2 month after operation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
2 month after operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
4 months after operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: 7 months after operation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
7 months after operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: 13 months after CI operation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
13 months after CI operation
|
Speech perception
Time Frame: over 13 months after CI activation
|
The patient are tested for speech recognition and the results were recorded as a percentage
|
over 13 months after CI activation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: pre-operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
pre-operation
|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
1 month after operation
|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: 2 months after operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
2 months after operation
|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
4 months after operation
|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: 7 month after operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
7 month after operation
|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: 13 month after operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
13 month after operation
|
Pure tone test
Time Frame: over 13 month after operation
|
Evaluation of 250-8000hz hearing effect in patients with hearing loss
|
over 13 month after operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
Pre-operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
1 month after operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 months after operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
2 months after operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 months after operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
4 months after operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 7 months after operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
7 months after operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: 13 months after operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
13 months after operation
|
Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: over 13 months after operation
|
Assessment of patients' mental state (depression, anxiety, insomnia),The result analysis chart of this system shows the standard score.
The higher the score, the more serious the symptoms in this regard.
Generally speaking, those whose total anxiety score is less than 50 are normal; 50-60 is mild, 61-70 is moderate, and more than 70 is severe anxiety.
The number of negative items means the number of items on which the subject did not respond, and the number of positive items means the number of items on which the subject responded.
Total rough score: the scores of 20 items are added together, and the demarcation score is 40 points.
|
over 13 months after operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Shi m Yang, M.D., Ph.D., Chinese PLA General Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CI and Tinnitus 01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tinnitus
-
State University of New York at BuffaloUniversity at BuffaloCompletedTinnitus, Subjective | Tinnitus | Noise Induced Tinnitus | Tinnitus, Objective | Tinnitus Aggravated | Tinnitus, Pulsatile | Tinnitus, Spontaneous Oto-Acoustic Emission | Tinnitus, Clicking | Tinnitus, Tensor Tympani InducedUnited States
-
Mohab MohammedNot yet recruitingPulsatile Tinnitus (Diagnosis)
-
Philipps University Marburg Medical CenterLinkoeping University; Eriksholm Research Centre; University Hospital of Gießen...CompletedTinnitus | Subjective Tinnitus | Chronic TinnitusGermany
-
University of GuadalajaraHospital Civil de Guadalajara; Institute of Experimental and Clinical TherapeuticsRecruitingOxidative Stress | Tinnitus, Subjective | Tinnitus, Bilateral | Antioxidant Therapy | Psychiatric Drugs | Inflammatory Cytokines | SSRIMexico
-
University Hospital, BordeauxNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
University of ZurichRecruitingTinnitus, Subjective | TinnitusSwitzerland
-
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGN Hearing A/SActive, not recruitingTinnitus, SubjectiveUnited States
-
University of ZurichCompletedTinnitus, SubjectiveGermany, Switzerland
Clinical Trials on Cochlear Implant
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMed-El CorporationCompletedMeniere's Disease | Unilateral Acoustic NeuromaUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalRecruitingProfound Bilateral Hearing LossFrance
-
Western University, CanadaLawson Health Research Institute; Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
CochlearCompletedSingle Sided DeafnessUnited States
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHRecruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralFrance
-
Med-El CorporationTerminatedHearing LossUnited States, Canada
-
CochlearCompleted
-
University of NottinghamNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCochlearRecruitingHearing Loss, Unilateral | Cochlear Implants | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Severe | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, ProfoundBelgium
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenKU Leuven; Cochlear; Agentschap Innoveren & Ondernemen (VLAIO)Active, not recruiting