Study to Analyze the Surgical Site Infections in a Group of Patients Who Were Randomly Applied a Negative Pressure Therapy Dressing Versus Conventional Dressing

July 8, 2022 updated by: María Moreno Gijon, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

Randomized Study on the Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications

Surgical site complications generate a series of consequences that prolong hospital stay, increase interventions and procedures, and consequently considerably increase healthcare costs. Hence, the importance of studying measures to reduce these complications and the most feared of them is surgical site infection. The objective of the study is to analyze the complications of the surgical site in a group of participante with risk factors for developing them after undergone abdominal surgery in the period described.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All non-consecutive participants operated on in a hospital were included, both those who, based on a protocol prepared by the investigators unit, were classified as having no risk of developing complications, low risk or high risk. Partfipants classified as low and high risk, after their consent to participate in the study, entered to form part of it. This participanta were classified before surgery according to the risk factors of themselves and of the procedure, and those at risk were randomized to treatment with a negative pressure therapy dressing or no treatment, and a cure was performed with a conventional dressing. The participants classified as not at risk of complications were not included in the study. In this way the investigators tried to analyze if the intervention with the negative pressure therapy dressing reduced the complications of the surgical site.The primary objective was to analyze the reduction of surgical site infections in participants treated with negative pressure therapy compared to those treated with conventional dressing. As secondary objectives the investigators proposed to measure other complications in both groups and the hospital stay.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

271

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Asturias
      • Oviedo, Asturias, Spain, 33009
        • María Moreno Gijón

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with risk factors for developing surgical site complications
  • undergo abdominal surgery
  • consent of the patient to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-consent of the patient to participate in the study
  • patients without risk of developing surgical site complications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: negative wound therapy group
those who receive negative pressure therapy
wound treated with negative pressure therapy dressing
No Intervention: conventional dressing group
those patients who heal with conventional dressing, therefore negative pressure therapy is not applied

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
surgical site complications
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
development of surgical site infection of wound seroma, skin dehiscence, wound necrosis
30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound Infection

Clinical Trials on negative preassure wound therapy

3
Subscribe