Optic Capture Without Anterior Vitrectomy in Pediatric Cataract Surgery

July 13, 2022 updated by: Ali Devebacak, Ege University

Purpose: To compare two pediatric cataract surgery procedures: intraocular lens (IOL) optic capture without anterior vitrectomy (AV) and in-the-bag IOL implantation with AV.

Setting: Ege University Medical School Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. Design: Prospective randomized control clinical trial. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: optic capture without AV (Group 1) or in-the-bag implantation with AV (Group 2). The following variables were compared: visual acuity, intraocular pressure, refractive errors, IOL tilt and decentration, lenticular astigmatism, anterior-posterior synechia, inflammatory cell deposits on IOL and post-operative complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Ege University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 10 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children with congenital or developmental cataracts who had cataract surgery and primary IOL implantation at a tertiary care referral institute were included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic or uveitic cataract, corneal opacity, iris coloboma, microphthalmia, microcornea, persistent fetal vascularization, congenital glaucoma, and retinopathy of prematurity were all considered exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Optic capture of Intraocular lens without anterior vitrectomy (Group 1)
optic capture of Intraocular lens without anterior vitrectomy
EXPERIMENTAL: in-the-bag implantation of Intraocular lens with anterior vitrectomy (Group 2).
in-the-bag implantation of Intraocular lens with anterior vitrectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The prevalence of visual axis opacification
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Eyes were evaluated for presence of visual axis opacification at the slit lamp examinations.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
The prevalence of inflammatory deposits on Intraocular lens surface
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Eyes were evaluated presence of inflammatory deposits between the margins of capsulorhexis at the slit lamp examinations.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
The prevalence of anterior-posterior synechia
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Eyes were evaluated for presence of anterior-posterior synechia at the slit lamp examinations.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Measurements of Intraocular lens tilt and decentration.
Time Frame: at the postoperative one-year
Measurement of Intraocular lens (IOL) position at vertical and horizontal meridians at the Scheimpflug images captured with corneal topography. Scheimpflug images were obtained (Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgerate Gmbh, Wetzlar, Germany) at one postoperative year. The horizontal and vertical meridians' photographs were analyzed.These images were processed in AutoCAD LT 2020 2D CAD software for IOL position assessment.(1) IOL Center: Two arches were drawn that fit perfectly on the anterior and posterior surfaces of the IOL. The points where these two arcs met were marked. Between these intersection points, a line was drawn. The midpoint of this line was accepted as the IOL center. (2) IOL Decentration: It was determined by measuring the distance (mm) from the IOL center point to the pupillary axis. (3) IOL Tilt: Angle (degree) between the IOL axis and the line passing through the iridocorneal angle.
at the postoperative one-year
Prediction error
Time Frame: at the post-operative one-month
Refraction prediction error (PE) was found by subtracting the early post-operative refraction from the pre-operative target refraction.
at the post-operative one-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraocular pressure
Time Frame: at the postoperative one year
Intraocular pressure was measured by Tonopen (Reichart Technologies, Depew, NY), Perkins handheld Mk2 tonometry (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) or Goldmann applanation tonometry (Haag Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland), considering the patient's age and compliance.
at the postoperative one year
Lenticular astigmatism
Time Frame: One-year postoperatively
Calculated by subtracting corneal astigmatism from manifest astigmatism.
One-year postoperatively
Posterior segment complications
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
In the fundoscopic examination, the patients were evaluated for possible posterior segment complications such as retinal detachment, cystoid macular edema, and intraocular hemorrhage.
through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Devebacak, M.D., Ege University, Department of Ophthalmology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract, Juvenile

Clinical Trials on optic capture

3
Subscribe