- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05555719
Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical Study
October 12, 2022 updated by: Abo bakr fouad, Al-Azhar University
Fixed Functional Appliances comparisons in treatment of orthodontic class II malocclusion cases
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Comparison between two types of fixed functional appliances, the first one is the Mandibular Protraction Appliances, while the second one was the PowerScope Appliance.
the treatment duration was 6 months the patients age was considered according to Baccetti et al, CVMI 3,4
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
16
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 002
- Abubakr Mohamed Fouad
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
11 years to 14 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Skeletal and dental class II malocclusion with mandibular retrognathia, SNB>= 4.
- Patients in cervical vertebral maturation index 3 -5.
- Age ranged from 13-16 years.
- Overjet ≥ 5 mm.
- Minimum crowding in dental arches requiring no extraction of any permanent teeth (excluding third molars).
- Good oral hygiene and general health.
- No previous orthodontic treatment or jaw's surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Class I skeletal malocclusion
- periodontally compromised patient
- patients have systemic diseases interfering with orthodontic treatment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Mandibular Protraction Appliance
the first group that received Mandibular Protraction Appliance
|
Mandibular Protraction Appliance was installed on fixed orthodontic appliance
|
Experimental: PowerScope Appliances
the first group that received PowerScope Appliances
|
PowerScope Appliance was installed on fixed orthodontic appliance
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
SNA angle (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Anteroposterior postition of maxilla in relation to the anterior cranial base (SN line)
|
6 months
|
SNB angle (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Anteroposterior postition of mandible in relation to the anterior cranial base (SN line)
|
6 months
|
ANB angle (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The relationaship between maxilla and mandible
|
6 months
|
Effective mandibular length (mm) (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the length of the mandible (change in length before and after treatment)
|
6 months
|
Mandibular plane angle (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the angle between inferior border of the mandible (Go Me) and the anterior cranial base (SN line)
|
6 months
|
Maxillary incisors inclination (angle) (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The change of maxillary incisors inclination between the long axis of most protruded upper incisors and anterior cranial base (Sn line)
|
6 months
|
Mandibular incisors inclination (angle) (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The change of mandibular incisors inclination between the long axis of most protruded upper incisors and anterior cranial base (Sn line)
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Upper lip retrusion (mm) (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the amount of upper lip retrusion in millimeter in relation to E line (line extended between pronasale and soft tissue pogonion points)
|
6 months
|
Lower lip protrusion (on Cephalometric radiograph)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the amount of lower lip protrusion in millimeter in relation to E line (line extended between pronasale and soft tissue pogonion points)
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Abubakr M Fouad, Al-azhar university, Cairo - Egypt
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 22, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
September 27, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 13, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 12, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 346/1137/16/10/19
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Class II Malocclusion
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion Division 1Egypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownClass II Malocclusion, Division 1
-
University of BaghdadRecruitingTreating Class II Malocclusion and Bimaxillary ProclinationIraq
-
AL YousefKing Abdullah International Medical Research CenterUnknownMalocclusion, Angle Class I | Malocclusion; Angle Class II Division 1Saudi Arabia
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUnknownAngle Class II, Division 1 MalocclusionIndia
-
Al-Azhar UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Syrian Arab Republic
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Protraction Appliance
-
Université de MontréalUniversity Hospital, Montpellier; Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-SalpetriereCompletedObstructive Sleep ApneaFrance, Canada
-
VU University of AmsterdamCompleted
-
Université de MontréalAcademic Centre for Dentistry in AmsterdamCompletedObstructive Sleep ApneaCanada
-
University of MalayaUnknownObstructive Sleep ApneaMalaysia
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownClass II Division 1 Malocclusion
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Luco Hybrid OSA Appliance Inc.CompletedMigraine Headache | Sleep Bruxism | Tension HeadacheCanada
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class IIISyrian Arab Republic
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCompleted
-
Texas A&M UniversityRecruitingSnoring | Sleep FragmentationUnited States