Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Neurogenic Overactive Bladder in Stroke

May 2, 2024 updated by: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

A Mixed-methods Evaluation of the Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Neurogenic Overactive Bladder in Stroke

Neurogenic overactive bladder (NOAB) presents with urgency incontinence. Existing NOAB management is expensive, lacks standardized regimens, or is invasive. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness of non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for NOAB management among stroke survivors remains crucial.

Objectives: Evaluate the effects of active-rTMS compared to sham-rTMS among stroke survivors with NOAB, the interventions' cost-effectiveness and explore their experiences qualitatively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Summary Background: Neurogenic overactive bladder (NOAB) presents with urgency incontinence. Existing NOAB management is expensive, lacks standardized regimens, or is invasive. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness of non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for NOAB management among stroke survivors remains crucial.

Objectives: Evaluate the effects of active-rTMS compared to sham-rTMS among stroke survivors with NOAB, the interventions' cost-effectiveness and explore their experiences qualitatively.

Hypothesis: Active-rTMS will reduce NOAB symptom severity for stroke survivors, interventions' cost and assist in gaining insight into the NOAB patients' experiences.

Methods: This study will be a randomised-sham-controlled, double-blinded trial, with embedded qualitative and cost-effectiveness studies. Snowball-convenience sampling technique and computer-generated randomisation will be adopted to recruit 30 participants into active-rTMS and sham-rTMS groups each. Active-rTMS participants will receive a continuous 1 pulse per second 1200 pulses of low-frequency rTMS to the pelvic floor muscle representation in the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) for 20 minutes thrice weekly. Sham-rTMS participants will receive the same parameters as the active-rTMS group, however, the coil will be rotated 90° away from the scalp. Fifteen active-rTMS participants will be invited for 45-60 minutes focus group discussions. The primary and secondary outcomes will be urinary incontinence severity and quality of life evaluated using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Incontinence-Quality of life Questionnaire, respectively. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) will be the cost-effectiveness outcome. The EQ-5D-5L responses will estimate the gain or loss of QALY. A follow-up assessment will be conducted one-months post-intervention. The Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) will be used to collect information on the whole range of services and support required by the study participants.

Statistical analysis: Normality will be evaluated using Shapiro-Wilk test. To determine active-rTMS and sham-rTMS group differences, between-groups analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be conducted using R software. Bonferroni correction will be applied for multiple comparisons. Thematic analysis will be used for analysing the qualitative data. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, the unadjusted mean costs and cost differences between active-rTMS and the sham-rTMS group will be calculated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke survivors aged between 18-80 years diagnosed with NOAB
  • Urodynamic findings confirming detrusor overactivity
  • Experience moderate (OABSS scores: 6-11 points) to severe NOAB (OABSS scores: 12 points and above)
  • Obtain a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of ≥ 24
  • Be willing to be randomized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of metals in the cranium, intracardiac lines, increased intracranial pressure, heart diseases, or cardiac pacemaker, use of sacral neuro-modulation
  • Pregnancy or less than six months postpartum stage
  • Patients with a family history of epilepsy or seizures
  • Patients taking tricyclic antidepressants or neuroepileptics
  • Participation in any other research project related to urinary incontinence; contra-indicated to MRI, urologic cancer, prostatic pathology, severe pelvic pain, six weeks post-surgery and non-neurogenic bladder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active rTMS group
The active rTMS group will receive a 1 Hz inhibitory low-frequency rTMS protocol hotspot of the contra-lessional primary motor cortex (M1), will deliver a continuous pulse of 1 pulse per second totalling 1200 pulses of 80% active motor threshold stimulation. The duration of the stimulation will last for 20 minutes thrice a week for four weeks (12 sessions). The motor threshold will be the minimum single-pulse TMS intensity necessary to elicit a motor-evoked potential greater than 50μV in more than 5 out of 10 consecutive trials. The standard 70 mm figure-of-eight air-cooled coil handle (MagPro) will be held at right angle to the skull for effective M1 stimulation. The participants in the active rTMS groups will receive a subthreshold stimulation intensity for muscle contraction with no painful peripheral sensation
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS group
The sham rTMS will be applied using the same parameters as the active rTMS but the coil will be rotated 90° away from the scalp so that minimal or no flow of current will be induced

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) questionnaire.
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)
The OABSS is reported to be a reliable and valid questionnaire for the quantitative evaluation of overactive bladder symptoms in the Hong Kong population (ICC score: 0.82). The measure comprised four questions on OAB symptoms with domain maximum scores ranging from 2 to 5: daytime frequency (two points), night-time frequency (three points), urgency (five points), and UUI (five points). The OABSS total score ranges from 0 to 15 points, with higher scores indicating higher symptom severity. According to severity, mild is defined as a score of 3 to 5 points, moderate as a score of 6 to 11 points, and severe as a score of 12 or more points.
Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incontinence Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (I-QoL)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)
The I-QoL is reported to be a psychometrically robust incontinence-specific outcome measure for the evaluation of OAB quality of life. The I-QoL measure has 22 items subdivided into 3 subscale scores. The total scores is 100 with 0 representing worst quality of life and 100 means absence of problem (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.93). The measure is tested among Chinese population and found to be of sound psychometric properties; high internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.963; excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.74-0.96, P<0.01) and acceptable construct validity.
Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)
The Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)
The Brief Resilience Scale has been reported to provide unique and critical information regarding "people coping with health-related stressors". Items 1, 3, and 5 on the scale are positively worded. In contrast, items 2, 4, and 6 are negatively worded. Resilience represents coping strategy of individuals to stressed environment and negative life events. The resilience is observed to be lacking in people with urinary incontinence of all age groups
Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)
The 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)
The 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) version developed by the EuroQol Research Foundation will be used to estimate the Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gain or loss.
Pre intervention, post intervention (4 weeks) and follow up (4 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

3
Subscribe