TEEN HEED: An Adolescent Diabetes Prevention Intervention Incorporating Novel Mobile Health Technologies

December 22, 2023 updated by: Nita Vangeepuram, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

The number of youth with type 2 diabetes in the U.S. is projected to increase by a staggering 49 percent by 2050, with higher rates among minority youth. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is recognized as a sentinel study demonstrating the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention among pre-diabetic adults but has not yet been replicated in youth. In addition, such intensive interventions are often not sustainable in high risk communities with limited resources. One strategy that has been successfully employed in adults from such communities is peer based health education. However, there have been no peer led interventions in ethnic minority teens and no interventions focused specifically on weight loss for diabetes prevention. Another challenge identified in existing youth health intervention programs is keeping youth engaged to enhance program participation and impact. One potential strategy is the use of mobile technologies (text messaging, mobile applications, social media) to support weight management programs, but to date use of such technologies has largely not been studied in youth. The Principal Investigator's NIH Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award (K23) aimed to use CBPR to develop and pilot test a peer-led diabetes prevention intervention incorporating mobile health technologies for at-risk adolescents. Based on results of focus groups which explored strategies for using peer educators and mHealth tools as part of a group lifestyle change program, the researchers did not find existing tools with all the features and functionalities required by users. The investigators therefore began working with teen stakeholders to create a new text messaging platform to support participants as the teens complete the intervention. This R03 research proposal aims to bring together clinical, technology and community experts to further develop and evaluate the mobile health platform. This will provide important pilot data to refine and disseminate the intervention for a larger RCT to be tested in a future R01.

Specific Aims:

  1. Synthesize real-time data and analytics and conduct user interface (UI) testing to refine and enhance features of the prototype text messaging platform.
  2. Investigate the potential for the developed platform to be used as an adjunct to a group educational intervention by examining whether level of use, user satisfaction, and degree of engagement with the platforms modifies behavioral and clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For Aim 1 (user interface testing):

  • Ages 13-19 years;
  • English speaking with English or Spanish speaking parent/guardian;
  • Affiliated with East Harlem.

For Aim 2 (virtual workshop):

  • Ages 13-19 years;
  • English speaking with English or Spanish speaking parent/guardian;
  • Affiliated with East Harlem;
  • Overweight/obese based on measured body mass index;
  • prediabetic based on hemoglobin A1c

Exclusion Criteria:

- Medical or developmental conditions which would make it difficult to participate in a virtual group educational program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Text messaging program
Enrolled participants received the pilot text messaging program.
text messaging content to support diabetes prevention.
Experimental: Virtual peer education
Enrolled participants received a virtual peer education diabetes prevention program.
virtual workshop content to support diabetes prevention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: baseline

Maintenance or reduction of BMI after completion of the virtual diabetes prevention program.

BMI is a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. A high BMI can indicate high body fatness and may lead to health problems.

baseline
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months

Maintenance or reduction of BMI after completion of the virtual diabetes prevention program.

BMI is a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. A high BMI can indicate high body fatness and may lead to health problems.

end of study at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months

A1C is a lab test that shows the average level of blood sugar (glucose) over the previous 3 months. It shows how well a person is controlling blood sugar to help prevent complications from diabetes.

Hemoglobin A1c (per American Diabetes Association): normal is 4-5.6% (5.7-6.4% is prediabetes and >6.5% is diabetes level)

end of study at 3 months
Triglycerides
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
(<150 is normal, 150-199 is borderline, 200-499 is high).
end of study at 3 months
Screentime-weekend
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Screen time on the weekend in hours (daily, average) - Combined TV, computer, video games, smartphone/Ipad/etc.
end of study at 3 months
Self-Image Score
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Total range score from 6-24; higher score indicates better self-image
end of study at 3 months
Depression Score
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Total range score from 6-18; higher score indicates more depression symptoms
end of study at 3 months
Body Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Total range score from 10-60; higher score indicates higher body satisfaction
end of study at 3 months
Emotional Eating Score
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Total range score from 5-20; higher score indicates more emotional eating
end of study at 3 months
Number of Participants Who Were Responsive to Interactive 2-way Messages
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Text Messaging Program - Number of participants who were responsive to interactive 2-way messages
12 Weeks
Number of Participants Who Were Engaged Every Week
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Text Messaging Program - Number of participants who initially consented to the study who were engaged every week
12 weeks
Level of Engagement
Time Frame: Over 12 weeks of time

Text Messaging Program - Level of engagement as measured by responsiveness to 2-way interactive messages.

Percent responding over the 12 weeks.

Over 12 weeks of time
Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: baseline

A1C is a lab test that shows the average level of blood sugar (glucose) over the previous 3 months. It shows how well a person is controlling blood sugar to help prevent complications from diabetes.

Hemoglobin A1c (per American Diabetes Association): normal is 4-5.6% (5.7-6.4% is prediabetes and >6.5% is diabetes level)

baseline
Body Fat %
Time Frame: baseline
For girls normal range is 16-31% for ages 13-18 years; for boys normal range is 10-22% for ages 13-18 years. Higher % indicates higher metabolic risk.
baseline
Body Fat %
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
For girls normal range is 16-31% for ages 13-18 years; for boys normal range is 10-22% for ages 13-18 years. Higher % indicates higher metabolic risk.
end of study at 3 months
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: baseline
Waist circumference for boys/girls 10th-90th percentile ranges from 63.0-116.5 cm. Higher percentile indicates higher metabolic risk.
baseline
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Waist circumference for boys/girls 10th-90th percentile ranges from 63.0-116.5 cm. Higher percentile indicates higher metabolic risk.
end of study at 3 months
Blood Pressure - Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures
Time Frame: baseline
Blood pressure is the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels. Higher blood pressure may indicate higher metabolic risk.
baseline
Blood Pressure - Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Blood pressure is the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels. Higher blood pressure may indicate higher metabolic risk.
end of study at 3 months
Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: baseline
(<200 is low risk, 200-239 borderline, >240 high risk).
baseline
Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
(<200 is low risk, 200-239 borderline, >240 high risk).
end of study at 3 months
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)
Time Frame: baseline
(<100 is best, 100-129 is acceptable for those with no health issues, 130-159 is borderline, 160-189 is high).
baseline
Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
(<100 is best, 100-129 is acceptable for those with no health issues, 130-159 is borderline, 160-189 is high).
end of study at 3 months
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)
Time Frame: baseline
(>60 is good, 40-59 is normal, <40 is associated with increased risk of heart disease).
baseline
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
(>60 is good, 40-59 is normal, <40 is associated with increased risk of heart disease).
end of study at 3 months
Triglycerides
Time Frame: baseline
(<150 is normal, 150-199 is borderline, 200-499 is high).
baseline
Portion Control
Time Frame: baseline
This is a validated scale to measure how well someone controls the amount of food they eat. The total scale value ranges from 8-32; higher score indicates better portion control.
baseline
Portion Control
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
This is a validated scale to measure how well someone controls the amount of food they eat. The total scale value ranges from 8-32; higher score indicates better portion control.
end of study at 3 months
Self-Efficacy Healthy Eating Subscale 1
Time Frame: baseline
This is a validated scale to measure how confident someone is that they can eat healthy. The total scale value ranges from 8-40; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
baseline
Self-Efficacy Healthy Eating Subscale 1
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
This is a validated scale to measure how confident someone is that they can eat healthy. The total scale value ranges from 8-40; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
end of study at 3 months
Self-Efficacy Health Eating Subscale 2
Time Frame: baseline
This is a validated scale to measure how confident someone is that they can eat healthy. The total scale value ranges from 5-25; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
baseline
Self-Efficacy Health Eating Subscale 2
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
This is a validated scale to measure how confident someone is that they can eat healthy. The total scale value ranges from 5-25; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
end of study at 3 months
Perceived Barriers to Health Eating
Time Frame: baseline
This is a scale to measure participants perceptions about the barriers they face for eating healthy. The total scale value ranges from 4-16; higher score indicates more perceived barriers.
baseline
Perceived Barriers to Health Eating
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
This is a scale to measure participants perceptions about the barriers they face for eating healthy. The total scale value ranges from 4-16; higher score indicates more perceived barriers.
end of study at 3 months
Daily MVPA Hours
Time Frame: baseline
Daily MVPA (moderate to vigorous physical activity) hours of moderate to vigorous physical activity (daily, average over the last week)
baseline
Daily MVPA Hours
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Daily MVPA (moderate to vigorous physical activity) hours of moderate to vigorous physical activity (daily, average over the last week)
end of study at 3 months
Strenuous Exercise Hours
Time Frame: baseline
Hours of strenuous physical activity (daily, average over the last week).
baseline
Strenuous Exercise Hours
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Hours of strenuous physical activity (daily, average over the last week).
end of study at 3 months
Moderate Exercise Hours
Time Frame: baseline
Hours of moderate physical activity (daily, average over the last week).
baseline
Moderate Exercise Hours
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Hours of moderate physical activity (daily, average over the last week).
end of study at 3 months
Mild Exercise Hours
Time Frame: baseline
Hours of mild physical activity (daily, average over the last week).
baseline
Mild Exercise Hours
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Hours of mild physical activity (daily, average over the last week).
end of study at 3 months
Time Spent Doing Physically Active Chores
Time Frame: baseline
Hours of physically active chores (daily, average over the last week).
baseline
Time Spent Doing Physically Active Chores
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Hours of physically active chores (daily, average over the last week).
end of study at 3 months
Time Spent Walking
Time Frame: baseline
Hours of walking (daily, average over the last week).
baseline
Time Spent Walking
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Hours of walking (daily, average over the last week).
end of study at 3 months
Time Spent Doing Unscheduled/Unstructured Physical Activity
Time Frame: baseline
Hours of Unscheduled/unstructured PA (daily, average over the last week).
baseline
Time Spent Doing Unscheduled/Unstructured Physical Activity
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Hours of Unscheduled/unstructured PA (daily, average over the last week).
end of study at 3 months
Screentime -Weekday
Time Frame: baseline
Screen time on the weekdays in hours (daily, average) - Combined TV, computer, video games, smartphone/Ipad/etc.
baseline
Screentime -Weekday
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
Screen time on the weekdays in hours (daily, average) - Combined TV, computer, video games, smartphone/Ipad/etc.
end of study at 3 months
Screentime-weekend
Time Frame: baseline
Screen time on the weekend in hours (daily, average) - Combined TV, computer, video games, smartphone/Ipad/etc.
baseline
Physical Activity Self Efficacy Score
Time Frame: baseline
This is a validated scale to measure how confident participants are that they can be physically active. The total scale value ranges from 6-24; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
baseline
Physical Activity Self Efficacy Score
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
This is a validated scale to measure how confident participants are that they can eat healthy. The total scale value ranges from 6-24; higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
end of study at 3 months
Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity Score
Time Frame: baseline
This is a scale to measure participants perceptions about the barriers they face for being physically active. The total scale value ranges from 8-32; higher score indicates more perceived barriers.
baseline
Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity Score
Time Frame: end of study at 3 months
This is a scale to measure participants perceptions about the barriers they face for eating healthy. The total scale value ranges from 8-32; higher score indicates more perceived barriers.
end of study at 3 months
Self-Image Score
Time Frame: baseline
Total range score from 6-24; higher score indicates better self-image
baseline
Depression Score
Time Frame: baseline
Total range score from 6-18; higher score indicates more depression symptoms
baseline
Body Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: baseline
Total range score from 10-60; higher score indicates higher body satisfaction
baseline
Emotional Eating Score
Time Frame: baseline
Total range score from 5-20; higher score indicates more emotional eating
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nita Vangeepuram, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2023

Last Verified

December 16, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GCO 17-2272
  • 5R03DK118302-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Text messaging

3
Subscribe