Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) (DBS MEP)

October 3, 2022 updated by: University of Manitoba

Combining Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) to Map Activation Loci in the Human Corticospinal Tract

MEP onset latencies from the hand muscle using two different stimulus methods will be compared from each study participant. Conventional MEP data will be collected prior to skin incision. Following the DBS insertion hand muscle evoked responses will be generated via the DBS electrode. A hand held DBS programmer will be connected to the proximal end of the implanted DBS for delivery of electrical stimuli. Stimulus intensity will be adjusted until a hand muscle evoked potential is registered from the same recording electrodes used for the conventional MEP acquisition. A STN-implanted electrode can produce hand muscle responses due to it's close proximity to the motor fibres of the internal capsule. When the conventional and DBS-induced hand muscle responses have been acquired the study data objectives have been met. Data will be analyzed off-line.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Purpose: Hand muscle MEP generated via the DBS electrode will provide an onset latency standard from which we can compare conventional MEP from the same hand muscles. It is critical for validation of conventional MEP to know where in the brain the motor pathway is being stimulated. This will avoid false negative MEP test results.

Objectives: We will measure the onset latencies from hand muscle MEP generated via the DBS electrode as well as using conventional MEP methods. The DBS onset latency data will provide a known anatomical standard to compare with conventional hand MEP.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patient population will be those diagnosed with medically refractory Parkinson's Disease or Essential tremor and scheduled for DBS surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients scheduled for DBS surgery under general anesthesia; age 35-75 years; no history of stroke or peripheral nerve disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • peripheral nerve disease (e.g. type I diabetes); demyelinating disease (e.g. multiple sclerosis); previous stroke; allergy to propofol based anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
DBS latency/MEP latency
Each patient will serve as control and test. Control will be latency of hand MEP generated by DBS stimulation of the corticospinal tract. The test condition will be the latency of hand MEP generated by conventional MEP acquisition.
see previous descriptions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combining deep brain stimulation (DBS) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) to map activation loci in the human corticospinal tract
Time Frame: 12 months
onset latency of motor evoked potentials
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marshall F Wilkinson, PhD, University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HS25589

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

onset latencies derived from conventional and DBS-induced MEP will be available upon study completion

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MEP Onset Latency

Clinical Trials on motor evoked potentials

3
Subscribe