LBBP as Initial Therapy in Patients With Non-ischemic Heart Failure and LBBB (LIT-HF)

Left Bundle Branch Pacing as Initial Therapy in Patients With Non-ischemic Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block (LIT-HF Study)

The present study will recruit 50 symptomatic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35% and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB), who have not received complete guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Each patient was randomized to 2 groups, GDMT or left bundle branch pacing combined with GDMT (LBBP+GDMT) as initial therapy and was followed up for 2 phases: 0-6 months (phase I), 7-18 months (phase II). The primary objective is to compare the LVEF change , syncope and malignant ventricular arrhythmias between GDMT group and LBBP+GDMT group, and to observe which strategy will significantly reduce the percentage of recommendations for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) during phase I study. The second outcome measures including health economics, echocardiography parameters[left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)], N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), quality of life score(QOL) and incidence of clinical adverse events.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Therapies currently approved to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have generally shown significant benefit on morbidity and mortality, resulting in strong recommendations in treatment guidelines. Four standard drugs classes, composed of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACE-I/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), have already been standard background therapy in HFrEF. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker/Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation (CRT-P/CRT-D) is an established treatment to HF patients, especially in LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, CLBBB with a QRS duration (QRSd) ≥150 ms, and symptoms on 3-6 months of GDMT. Both the 2021 ESC and the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines for HF included LVEF≤35% after 3-6 months of GDMT as a strong indication for ICD implantation in non-ischemic heart disease.

The traditional biventricular pacing (BiVP) could correct the cardiac dyssynchrony to improve clinical symptoms and reduce all-cause mortality in HF. However, almost 30%-40% of patients with successful implantation show no response and BiVP just corrects the mechanical dyssynchrony caused by LBBB not corrects the LBBB. His Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) technology has made significant progress in recent five years. His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing(LBBP) can correct LBBB and achieve physiological cardiac resynchronization only by ordinary single-chamber or dual-chamber pacemaker. LBBP has been reported to produce stable pacing thresholds, adequately sensed R-wave amplitude, and higher likelihood to correct LBBB by pacing more distal to the site of conduction block compared with HBP. The feasibility and efficacy of LBBP for CRT in HF patients with LBBB was demonstrated by previous observational studies showing that LBBP-CRT achieves a narrower QRSd, higher percentage of super responders, and lower pacing thresholds than BiVP-CRT. The LBBP-RESYNC study showed that LBBP-CRT demonstrated greater LVEF improvement than BiVP-CRT in HF patients with NICM and LBBB.

It remains unclear as to the following questions: 1. After 3-6 months of GDMT, what is the percentage of patients with LVEFs improvement from ≤35% to >35% in HFrEF patients with NICM and CLBBB, and what are the absolute values of the increase in LVEFs; 2. How is the long-term prognosis of those patients with LVEF increased to >35% after GDMT. Whether these patients still need an ICD/CRT-D since they do not fall within the recommendations for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD); 3. What are the differences of LVEFs changes if LBBP is added to the medical treatment at the beginning.

There are to date no randomized studies comparing GDMT and LBBP combined with GDMT (LBBP+GDMT) as the initial therapy in HFrEF patients with NICM and CLBBB. The purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic effects of LBBP+GDMT and GDMT on LV function and clinical endpoints in such patients. The present study will randomize about 50 patients in multiple centres to LBBP+GDMT group or GDMT group.

The study is divided into two phases:

Phase I (0-6 months) : Patients are randomly assigned to either the drug therapy group (GDMT group) or the experimental group (LBBP+GDMT group). In GDMT group at 3-month follow-up, CRT-P/CRT-D will be implanted if LVEF is still ≤35% with absolute increase <5% from baseline or ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) events are recorded; otherwise, GDMT will be continued when LVEF >35% or LVEF≤35% but absolute increase >5% from baseline and no VT/VF event is observed. Patients in LBBP+GDMT group are directly treated with LBBP and GDMT after enrollment. The proportions of patients with LVEF ≤35% or VT/VF events in LBBP+GDMT group are assessed at 3-month and 6-month. The percentages of patients with LVEF ≤35% or VT/VF events in GDMT group are also assessed after 3 and 6 months as well.

Phase II (7-18 months): Patients in each group are followed up regularly (every 3-6 months, with mandatory at 12 and 18 months, with additional as appropriate) to assess the need for CRT-P/CRT-D/ICD when EF decreasing to ≤35%, syncope, or VT/VF events occurred.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
          • Xiaohan Fan, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xiaohan Fan, MD, PhD
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Fayuan Fu, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fayuan Fu, MD
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jiangang Zou, MD,Ph.D
        • Contact:
          • Jiangang Zou, MD,Ph.D
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xiaofeng Hou, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xinwei Zhang, MD,Ph.D
    • Liaoning
      • Dalian, Liaoning, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Yunlong Xia, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yunlong Xia, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yingxue Dong, MD
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
        • Contact:
          • Xingbin Liu, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xingbin Liu, MD
    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Weijian Huang, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lan Su, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Weijian Huang, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF≤35% as assessed by echocardiography, NYHA class II-III, and less than 3 months of optimized (complete) GDMT*;
  2. Sinus rhythm (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may be present) with complete left bundle branch block meeting STRAUSS's criteria;
  3. Between the ages of 18 and 80;
  4. With informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. After mechanical tricuspid valve replacement;
  2. Ischemic cardiomyopathy;
  3. Persistent AF without AV node ablation;
  4. History of unexplained syncope or indications for pacemaker implantation;
  5. Indications for ICD implantation such as a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden cardiac arrest;
  6. Unstable angina, acute MI, CABG or PCI within the past 3 months;
  7. Enrollment in any other study;
  8. A life expectancy of less than 12 months;
  9. Pregnant or with child-bearing potential;
  10. History of heart transplantation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GDMT group

With the current guidelines of recommended therapies for HF, each patient who meets the inclusion criteria should begin being on all 4 drug classes after enrollment, including a beta-blocker (BB), a RAS inhibitor (ACEI, ARB) or ARNI (preferred), an MRA, and an SGLT2i.

The appeal drugs should be gradually uptitrated to the maximum tolerated dose within the first 3-6 months.

Ivabradine will be added to the patients whose resting heart rates remain above 70 beats per minute (bpm) after adequate medical treatment, including a BB at maximum tolerated dose.

Quadruple anti-heart failure drug therapy: BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i. If the initial dose according to guidelines is tolerated, the protocol would then direct the uptitration of medication dose over time to a specified target dose, unless not well tolerated.

*Criteria for <3 months of optimized (complete) GDMT: 1) according to the latest management of HF, any of the "new quadruple therapy" is not used if the condition allowed; Or 2) the dose of any drug dose not reach the maximum tolerated target; Or 3) under the maximum tolerated dose of BB, ivabradine is not added with a heart rate still ≥70 bpm at rest.

Other Names:
  • Optimal Medical Therapy(OMT)
Experimental: LBBP+GDMT group

In this arm, medications are the same as the GDMT group. The LBBP lead is introduced into the right ventricle (RV) and is placed on the right side of the interventricular septum (IVS). The lead is advanced deeply into the IVS until reaching the LV septal subendocardium and right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology of the paced QRS complex is observed in electrocardiogram (ECG) lead V1.

If LBBP fails, his bundle pacing (HBP) should be considered when HBP could correct LBBB.

If both of LBBP and HBP fail, conventional BiVP-CRT could be the last option.

GDMT is the same as Drug intervention. LBBP is confirmed when: 1) the LBBB morphology disappeared and the paced RBBB pattern (typical or atypical) is observed in V1; and 2) LVAT is ≤100 ms at low output(≤3 V/0.5 ms); and at least 1 of the following is achieved: a) abrupt shortening of LVAT by >10 ms during mid/deep septal lead placement with a RBBB pattern in V1 at high output, which then remains short and constant at high and low output with further advancement of the lead to the final position; b) transition from nonselective to selective LBBP (QRS morphology transition from atypical RBBB to typical rsR' pattern in V1 and wide/large S-wave in V6 , with the appearance of an isoelectric segment and no LVAT change at high and low outputs); and c) transition from nonselective LBBP to LV septal pacing (lengthening of LVAT by at least 10 ms with or without obvious QRS morphology transition during threshold testing).

HBP or BiVP is attempted using the standard-of-care technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients requiring ICD implantation for prevention of sudden cardiac death(SCD)
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
After treatment with two strategies(GDMT, LBBP+GDMT), the percentages of LVEF still ≤35% and/or ventricular arrhythmia events was assessed in both groups. That is, the percentage of patients who are eligible for primary/secondary prevention ICD implantation.
6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health economics
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
The cost of the two treatment strategies were evaluated comprehensively, including each inpatient, outpatient and unplanned follow-up
3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in LVEF
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
LVEF is assessed by echocardiography (Simpson's rule) and compared between the baseline and follow-up.
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in LVESV
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
LVESV is assessed by echocardiography (Simpson's rule) and compared between the baseline and follow-up.
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in LVEDV
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
LVEDV is assessed by echocardiography (Simpson's rule) and compared between the baseline and follow-up.
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in concentration of NT-proBNP in blood between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Blood test is performed at each time frame to determine the concentration of NT-proBNP(unit: pg/mL)
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in New York Heart Association Heart Function Classification between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
The higher the classification, the more severe the heart failure symptoms(four levels: I, II, III and IV)
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Change in Quality Of Life Questionnaire score between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Reflect the effect of heart failure on quality of life, and higher scores represent a worse outcome
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Incidence of clinical adverse events
Time Frame: Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up
Including date and number of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular hospitalization and malignant ventricular arrhythmia
Baseline; 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jiangang Zou, MD,Ph.D, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
  • Principal Investigator: Xiaofeng Hou, MD, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
  • Principal Investigator: Yunlong Xia, MD, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
  • Principal Investigator: Yingxue Dong, MD, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy(GDMT)

3
Subscribe