Augmented-reality Based Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

March 20, 2024 updated by: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Effects of Augmented-reality Based Mirror Therapy on Sensorimotor Function of Upper Extremity

In the proposed study, the investigators assumed that mirror therapy combined with augmented reality technology will provide a better treatment effects than traditional mirror therapy for the patients with unilateral stroke. The aim of the study is to examine the difference in the treatment effects among the combination of task-oriented training with either augmented reality based mirror therapy, mirror therapy or traditional occupational therapy on the upper extremity function and brain activity of the stroke patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • Recruiting
        • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of stroke with unilateral side involved;
  • A score of Mini-mental state examination greater than 24 for proving higher mental function
  • Time of onset > 6 months before treatment begins; and
  • Premorbid right-handedness.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe vision impairment;
  • Major cognitive-perceptual deficit;
  • Other brain disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional occupational therapy
Traditional occupational therapy delivered skill training related to daily living tasks.
Motor training targeted to goals that are relevant to the functional needs of the patient
Active Comparator: Mirror therapy using a mirror box
Exercise of mirror therapy included movements of forearm, wrist, fingers and thumb, as well as a tendon gliding exercise using a mirror box .
Mirror therapy using a mirror box
Experimental: Augmented reality-based mirror therapy

Exercise of augmented reality-based mirror therapy included movements of forearm, wrist, fingers and thumb, as well as a tendon gliding exercise using an augmented reality mirror therapy system

.

Augmented reality-based mirror therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for motor function of upper extremity test
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
Each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed). The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the result of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
Muscle tone is defined by the resistance of a muscle being stretched without resistance. The MAS scores were distributed across the entire scale, ranging from 0 to 4, that is convenient for the clinician use. The grading of the scale is described as below: 0) no increase in muscle tone; 1) minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion; 1+) slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the reminder (less than half) of the ROM; 2) more marked increase in tone but only after part is easily flexed; 3) considerable increase in tone; and 4) passive movement is difficult and affected part is rigid in flexion or extension.
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
Change in the result of Box and blocks test
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
The score is the number of blocks carried from one box to the other in one minute. Higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
Change in the result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilamenttest examines the cutaneous pressure threshold, range from 1.65-6.65. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
Change in the result of Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
Semi-structured interview examine how much and how well the subject uses their more-affected arm for 30 ADLs. Score range from 0-5. Higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (Hb) hemoglobin concentrations using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)
Time Frame: baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks
To investigate the activation of specific brain regions
baseline, 9 weeks and 21 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Traditional occupational therapy

3
Subscribe