- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05613686
Theta Burst Stimulation for Motor Recovery
Comparative Efficacy of Different Doses of Theta Burst Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology.
High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode. Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect. Through modulating the excitability of bilateral hemispheres, rTMS could facilitate motor recovery in stroke patients.
This study will compare efficacy of different doses iTBS in combination with inhibitory rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability in subacute stroke patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Meng Ting Lin, M.D.
- Phone Number: 67048 +886-2312-3456
- Email: b96401093@ntu.edu.tw
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ming Yen Hsiao, M.D., PhD
- Phone Number: 67316 +886-2312-3456
- Email: myferrant@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
- Recruiting
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Meng Ting Lin, M.D.
- Phone Number: +886-2312-3456
- Email: b96401093@ntu.edu.tw
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1.Unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- 2.Stroke within 3 months
- 3.Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength in upper limb ≤ 3
- 4.No previous stroke, seizure, dementia, Parkinson's disease or other degenerative neurological diseases.
- 5.Patient could sit over 15 minutes
- 6.Age over 20
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1.Previous stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor
- 2.With central nervous system disease (spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease)
- 3.Any contraindication to rTMS (seizure, alcoholism, metal implant, pacemaker)
- 4.Patients unable to cooperate the treatment
- 5.Pregnancy
- 6.Depression
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: contralateral 1Hz+ipsilateral iTBS 1
Patients received contralateral 1 Hz and ipsilateral iTBS with protocol 1
|
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology.
High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex.
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode.
Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect.
|
Experimental: contralateral 1Hz+ipsilateral iTBS 2
Patients received contralateral 1 Hz and ipsilateral iTBS with protocol 2
|
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology.
High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex.
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode.
Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect.
|
Active Comparator: contralateral 1Hz
Patients received contralateral 1 Hz and ipsilateral sham iTBS
|
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology.
High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex.
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode.
Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
12 weeks post intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength, assessing muscle strength from Grade 5 (normal) to Grade 0 (no visible contraction).
|
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
Barthel Index
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
Barthel Index, score 100-0.
Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
Modified Rankin Scale, score from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
MEP
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
motor evoked potential
|
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 1 week post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
1 week post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
4 weeks post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 24 weeks post intervention
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
|
24 weeks post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Meng Ting Lin, M.D., The Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202204105DINB
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
-
University Hospital, GrenobleUnknownHealthy | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Transcranial Direct Current StimulationFrance
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Florida State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of RegensburgCompletedTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...CompletedTranscranial Magnetic StimulationFrance
-
Yi YangRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic StimulationChina
-
University of ZurichUniversity Hospital Inselspital, BerneRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Electric Stimulation TherapySwitzerland
-
NYU Langone HealthWithdrawn
-
Aalborg UniversityRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Electroencephalography | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Motor Cortex | Pain ThresholdsDenmark
Clinical Trials on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
-
State University of New York - Upstate Medical...RecruitingHeadache | Brain Concussion | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Post-Concussion SymptomsUnited States
-
Xuzhou Central HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Executive Function Disorder
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted
-
Guangzhou Psychiatric HospitalCompletedCognitive Impairment | Bipolar Disorder | RelapseChina
-
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalCompletedFailed Back Surgery Syndrome
-
Veterans Medical Research FoundationUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedHeadache | Gulf War SyndromeUnited States
-
Yi YangRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic StimulationChina
-
Yi YangRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic StimulationChina
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityCompletedBipolar DisorderChina
-
Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityCompletedPost-stroke Shoulder PainTurkey