Theta Burst Stimulation for Motor Recovery

November 6, 2022 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Comparative Efficacy of Different Doses of Theta Burst Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology. This study will compare efficacy of different doses iTBS in combination with inhibitory rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability in subacute stroke patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology.

High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode. Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect. Through modulating the excitability of bilateral hemispheres, rTMS could facilitate motor recovery in stroke patients.

This study will compare efficacy of different doses iTBS in combination with inhibitory rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability in subacute stroke patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ming Yen Hsiao, M.D., PhD
  • Phone Number: 67316 +886-2312-3456
  • Email: myferrant@gmail.com

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • 2.Stroke within 3 months
  • 3.Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength in upper limb ≤ 3
  • 4.No previous stroke, seizure, dementia, Parkinson's disease or other degenerative neurological diseases.
  • 5.Patient could sit over 15 minutes
  • 6.Age over 20

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Previous stroke, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor
  • 2.With central nervous system disease (spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease)
  • 3.Any contraindication to rTMS (seizure, alcoholism, metal implant, pacemaker)
  • 4.Patients unable to cooperate the treatment
  • 5.Pregnancy
  • 6.Depression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: contralateral 1Hz+ipsilateral iTBS 1
Patients received contralateral 1 Hz and ipsilateral iTBS with protocol 1
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology. High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode. Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect.
Experimental: contralateral 1Hz+ipsilateral iTBS 2
Patients received contralateral 1 Hz and ipsilateral iTBS with protocol 2
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology. High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode. Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect.
Active Comparator: contralateral 1Hz
Patients received contralateral 1 Hz and ipsilateral sham iTBS
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technology. High and low frequencies of rTMS could modulate the excitability of the cerebral cortex. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) has achieved a similar effect to traditional rTMS mode. Intermittent TBS (iTBS) could upregulate cortical excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) and continuous TBS (cTBS) with inhibitory effect.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
12 weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength, assessing muscle strength from Grade 5 (normal) to Grade 0 (no visible contraction).
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
Barthel Index
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
Barthel Index, score 100-0. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
Modified Rankin Scale, score from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
MEP
Time Frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
motor evoked potential
1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 1 week post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
1 week post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
4 weeks post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: 24 weeks post intervention
Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor function set, score: 0-66, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
24 weeks post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meng Ting Lin, M.D., The Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 29, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202204105DINB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

will make further analysis

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Clinical Trials on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

3
Subscribe