Laser Versus Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Warts

Laser Versus Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Warts: a Randomised Controlled Trial

To evaluate whether laser was superior to cryotherapy for recalcitrant warts

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients with recalcitrant warts were randomized equally to receive laser or cryotherapy every 3 to 4 weeks, for a maximum of 4 sessions.The primary outcomes were the cure rate at 16 weeks; secondary outcomes included time to clearance of warts, patient satisfaction with the treatment and treatment-related adverse effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with HPV2/27/57-induced recalcitrant warts, including periungualor mosaic warts, common or plantar warts with a duration of longer than 1 year, and common or plantar warts previously received no more than two sessions of cryotherapy
  • Total number of warts is ≤10 .
  • Aged 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are currently participating in another trial for the treatment of cutaneous warts.
  • Patients have taken immunosuppressant drugs (such as oral corticosteroids) during the past three months.
  • Patients have impaired healing eg due to diabetes, vitamin A deficiency, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.
  • Patients have autoimmune diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, scleroderma or other diseases).
  • Patients are pregnant or ready for pregnancies or breast-feeding.
  • Patients have cold intolerance (such as cold urticaria, cryoglobulinaemia, cold agglutinin syndrome or Raynaud's syndrome).
  • Patients have local pain intolerance.
  • Patients have local hypoesthesia.
  • Patients are unable to tolerate laser or cryotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: laser treatment
LP-Nd:YAG laser treatment
a maximum of 4 sessions, with an interval of 3 to 4 weeks
Active Comparator: cryotherapy
cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen
a maximum of 4 sessions, with an interval of 3 to 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cure rate at 16 weeks
Time Frame: 16 weeks since the initial treatment
A patient was considered to be cured if all warts were no longer visible and could not be palpated anymore.
16 weeks since the initial treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to clearance of warts
Time Frame: 16 weeks since the initial treatment
The time from treatment initiation until clearance of all warts
16 weeks since the initial treatment
patient satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: 16 weeks since the initial treatment
Patient satisfaction was rated on a 5-point scale (from very happy to very unhappy)
16 weeks since the initial treatment
treatment-related adverse events
Time Frame: 16 weeks since the initial treatment
Some adverse effects, including pain, swelling, blisters, hemorrhagic bullae, bruising, and skin breakdown, were recorded by the patients, whereas others, including secondary bacterial infection, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, and scarring were evaluated by a dermatologist
16 weeks since the initial treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shichao Lu, MD, The 306 Hospital of People's Liberation Army

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Warts

Clinical Trials on laser treatment

3
Subscribe