Comparison of Point-of-care Produced CAR T-cell With Commercial CAR T-cells in Patients With R/R LBCL (HOVON161)

November 30, 2022 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

A Phase II Non-inferiority Study Comparing Point-of-care Produced CAR T-cell to Commercial CAR T-cells in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A phase II, multi-center study to compare the feasibility, and clinical efficacy of local manufacturing of CD19-directed CAR T-cells (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells) with commercial produced CAR T-cells (for example axicabtagene ciloleucel, a CD19 targeting commercially available CAR T-cell) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an innovative form of adoptive cell therapy that has proven its efficacy in the treatment of various hematological malignancies, including B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). CD19 has been the most studied target antigen for CAR T-cell immunotherapy. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy has shown durable responses in patients with different B-NHLs, including Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).

Unfortunately, up to 50-60% of the patients do not respond to CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy or relapse. There are several shortcomings of current CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, that are likely responsible for therapy failure, namely: i) Due to centralized production at commercial sites, the production is time consuming (about 4 weeks), meaning that patients with rapidly progressive lymphoma may not reach the moment of the infusion of the anti-CD19 CAR T-cells. ii) Furthermore, for the current production processes, the autologous T-cells need to be cryopreserved for shipment from the hospital to the production sites and vice versa. This (double) cryopreservation process can decrease the quality of the CAR T-cells. This trial aims to address these shortcomings and will study the feasibility, and clinical efficacy of local manufacturing of CD19-directed CAR T-cells (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells), in a completely closed system using the CliniMACS Prodigy device. This study will compare the clinical efficacy of locally produced CAR T-cells to commercial produced CAR T-cells (for example axicabtagene ciloleucel, a CD19 targeting commercially available CAR T-cell) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL.

This in-house (point-of-care) production process of ARI-0001 will take approximately 12 days and thus will generate CAR T-cells "faster" which will be infused in the patient without cryopreservation ("fresh"). Furthermore, the point-of-care production process can be replicated in academic institutions with the appropriate cellular manufacturing facilities. If successful, this study will show feasibility of local production of CAR T-cell therapy, improving their rapid accessibility and quality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: T. (Tom) van Meerten
  • Phone Number: +31 (0)10 7041560
  • Email: hdc@erasmusmc.nl

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NL-Amsterdam-AMC
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • NL-Groningen-UMCG
      • Leiden, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NL-Leiden-LUMC
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NL-Maastricht-MUMC
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NL-Nijmegen-RADBOUDUMC
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NL-Rotterdam-ERASMUSMC
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • NL-Utrecht-UMCUTRECHT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed DLBCL and associated subtypes, defined by WHO 2016 classification: DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS), High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements with DLBCL histology (DHL/THL) and FL3B, T-cell/histocyte rich B-cell lymphoma, Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, transformed lymphoma (transformed follicular) and R/R after at least 2 lines of systemic therapy
  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤80 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/WHO performance status 0-2 (appendix D)
  • If the patient has a history of central nervous system (CNS) involvement, then he/she must have

    • No signs or symptoms of CNS involvement
    • No active disease on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    • Absence of large cell lymphoma in cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) on cytospin preparation or flow cytometry, regardless of the number of white blood cells
  • Estimated life expectancy of >3 months other than primary disease
  • Patients of child-bearing or child-fathering potential must be willing to practice birth control from the time of enrollment on this study and for four months after receiving the preparative regimen
  • Signed and dated informed consent before conduct of any trial-specific procedure
  • Patient is capable of giving informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1.0x109/L
  • Platelet count <50x109/L
  • Absolute lymphocyte count <0.1x109/L
  • Primary CNS lymphoma
  • Known history of infection with hepatitis C or B virus unless treated and confirmed to be polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative
  • HIV infection
  • Known history or presence of seizure activities or on active anti- seizure medications within the previous 12 months
  • Known history of CVA within prior 12 months
  • Unstable neurological deficits
  • Known history or presence of autoimmune CNS disease, such as multiple sclerosis, optic neuritis or other immunologic or inflammatory disease
  • Active systemic autoimmune disease for which immunosupressive therapy is required
  • Presence of CNS disease that, in the judgment of the investigator, may impair the ability to evaluate neurotoxicity, baseline dementia that would interfere with therapy or monitoring, determined using mini-mental status exam at baseline
  • Active systemic fungal, viral or bacterial infection
  • Clinical heart failure with New York Heart Association class ≥2 (appendix F) or Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40%
  • Resting oxygen saturation <92% on room air
  • Liver dysfunction as indicated by total bilirubin, AST and/or ALT >5 x institutional ULN, unless directly attributable to the lymphoma or Gilbert disease
  • GFR <40 mL/min calculated according to the modified formula of Cockcroft and Gault or by direct urine collection
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
  • Active other malignancy requiring treatment
  • Medical condition requiring prolonged use of systemic immunosuppressives with exception of prednisolone <10 mg/day
  • History of severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction against any drug or its Ingredients/impurities that is scheduled to be given during trial participation e.g. as part of the mandatory lymphodepletion protocol, premedication for infusion, or rescue medication/salvage therapies for treatment related toxicities
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological and geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A (ARI-0001)
Infusion with Point of Care CAR T-cells
Infusion with a single target dose of 2.0 x 10^6 Point of Care CAR T-cells/kg BW (range 1 -2.0x 10^6 CAR T-cells /kg BW).
Active Comparator: Arm B (Axi-cel)
Infusion with Standard of Care CAR T-cells
Infusion with a single target dose of 2.0 x 10^6 Standard of Care CAR T-cells/kg BW (range 1 -2.0x 10^6 CAR T-cells /kg BW).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS) from date of IMP infusion (if applicable)
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
PFS from date of IMP infusion is defined as the time from IMP infusion, until progression, relapse or death from any cause, whichever comes first. PFS reflects tumor growth and, therefore, occurs prior to the endpoint of OS. Progression is defined as the first date of documentation of a new lesion or enlargement of a previous lesion, or the date of the scheduled clinic visit immediately after radiologic assessment has been completed. If there is missing information, censoring of the data may be defined as the last date at which progression status was adequately assessed.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS) from date of randomization
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient enrollment
PFS from date of randomization is defined as the time from enrollment, until progression, relapse or death from any cause, whichever comes first. PFS reflects tumor growth and, therefore, occurs prior to the endpoint of OS. Progression is defined as the first date of documentation of a new lesion or enlargement of a previous lesion, or the date of the scheduled clinic visit immediately after radiologic assessment has been completed. If there is missing information, censoring of the data may be defined as the last date at which progression status was adequately assessed.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient enrollment
Safety and toxicity assessment per AE reporting
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Safety and toxicity assessment of ARI-0001 CAR T-cells and Axi-cel per AE reporting classified according to CTCAE Version 5 and CRS and ICANS classified according to the ASTCT criteria. The number and proportion of patients in the specific safety population with CTCAE grade 2, 3 or 4 (incl. grade 5) will be tabulated by randomization arm. Per site, the maximum observed grade per cycle within a patient will be used.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
ORR is the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), as well as CR, PR, SD and PD/relapse at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells.
At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
Expansion of CAR T-cells
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Expansion of CAR T-cells will be assessed in both treatment arms. The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Phenotype of CAR T-cells
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Phenotype of CAR T-cells will be assessed in both treatment arms. The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Persistence of CAR T-cells
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Persistence of CAR T-cells will be assessed in both treatment arms. The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
BOR is the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started) or start treatment in follow up, whichever occurs first. The patient's best response assignment will depend on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. It will be analyzed at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells.
4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
Duration Of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
DOR is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until time of the last assessment of response before the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). New treatment in follow up or death without previous recurrent or progressive disease will be considered as competing risks.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
OS is defined as the time from date of enrollment or from IMP infusion to the date of death from any cause (2 separate endpoints). Patients still alive will be censored at the date of last contact.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Patient Reported Outcome/Quality of Life (PRO/QOL) EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells

PRO/QOL will be assessed using the EQ-5D. Questionnaire will be completed by the subject, after registration and prior to leukapheresis, at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells.

The EQ-5D comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
Patient Reported Outcome/Quality of Life (PRO/QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym)
Time Frame: At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells

PRO/QOL will be assessed using FACT-Lym. Questionnaire will be completed by the subject, after registration and prior to leukapheresis, at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells.

The FACT-Lym (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma) comprises Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Lymphoma Subscale using a 5 point Likert-type scale.

At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
Patient Reported Outcome/Quality of Life (PRO/QOL) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells

PRO/QOL will be assessed using QLQ-C30. Questionnaire will be completed by the subject, after registration and prior to leukapheresis, at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells.

The QLQ-C30 is a Quality of Life questionnaire designed to measure cancer patients' physical, psychological and social functions, composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures.

At 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months after infusion of CAR T-cells
PoC CAR T-cell production characteristics (e.g. number of viable T-cells)
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
PoC CAR T-cell production characteristics (e.g. number of viable T-cells), including the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) between the different production sites. The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
PoC CAR T-cell production characteristics (e.g. transduction efficiency)
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
PoC CAR T-cell production characteristics (e.g. transduction efficiency), including the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) between the different production sites. The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
PoC CAR T-cell production characteristics (e.g. T-cell subsets (activated T-cells, memory T-cells))
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
PoC CAR T-cell production characteristics (e.g. T-cell subsets (activated T-cells, memory T-cells)), including the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) between the different production sites. The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The association of the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) of the CAR T-cell products (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells) with CAR T-cell expansion.
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The association of the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) of the CAR T-cell products (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells) with CAR T-cell persistence.
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The association of the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) of the CAR T-cell products (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells) with CAR T-cell adverse events.
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The association of the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) of the CAR T-cell products (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells) with CAR T-cell response rates.
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The association of the functional characteristics (e.g. potency tests) of the CAR T-cell products (ARI-0001 CAR T-cells) with CAR T-cell progression free survival.
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
The central lab will collect these data, but the vast majority will not be entered in the ALEA database, and will only be analyzed by the central lab. Further details and analyses will be described in a separate SAP, which will be written by those involved in that specific analysis.
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
Proportion of successful batches (in percentage) between the different production sites.
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient with PoC IMP infusion
Number of days between leukapheresis and infusion of CAR T-cells (vein-to-vein time)
Time Frame: Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion
Approximately up to 60 months following first patient IMP infusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: T. (Tom) van Meerten, UMCG / HOVON

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NHL

Clinical Trials on ARI-0001

3
Subscribe