Mobile Technology-Based System for Patient Engagement and Physician-Directed Remote Management of Heart Failure

July 28, 2023 updated by: Alexander Sandhu, Stanford University

Design of a Mobile Technology-Based System for Patient Engagement and Physician-Directed Remote Management of Heart Failure

This pilot study is to assess the feasibility, preliminary utility and acceptance of a digital technology-based system for heart failure management.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart failure continues to be a major public health problem. High-value, guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) for heart failure can reduce mortality and improve quality of life. However, large gaps in treatment with GDMT persist. While prior quality improvement efforts have focused on heart failure hospitalizations, there is a critical need to improve the quality-of-care post-discharge when the initiation and up-titration of GDMT is critical to optimizing outcomes. The main purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, preliminary utility and acceptance of a digital technology-based system for heart failure management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford Hospital & Clinics
        • Contact:
          • Alexander Sandhu, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Diagnosis of heart failure
  • Most recent left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% in the prior year based on echocardiogram, MRI, CT, or nuclear perfusion
  • Primary cardiologist enrolled in the study
  • Currently admitted with upcoming discharge or discharged from hospital within the prior 2 weeks
  • At least two eligible heart failure therapies (guideline-recommended BB, RASI, MRA, or SGLT2i) not yet initiated or on ≤ 50% of target dose

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receives dialysis
  • Inotropic therapy during hospitalization
  • History of heart transplant or actively listed on heart transplant waiting list
  • History of left ventricular assist device implantation
  • Cardiac amyloidosis
  • Pregnant or currently trying to be pregnant
  • Life expectancy estimated less than 6 months related to non-cardiac comorbidities as per investigator's judgement
  • Actively enrolled in hospice or comfort care
  • Currently participating in an investigational device or drug study or having participated in such a study within 30 days prior to screening
  • Subject or their caregiver without a smartphone
  • Subject or their caregiver not proficient with written and spoken English
  • Subject unavailable to complete all study procedures (e.g., interviews) to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
  • Any other disorder or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion
  • Subject has diminished decision-making capacity
  • Planned discharge to skilled nursing facility

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Digital technology-based system for heart failure management
This is a single-arm study to assess the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a digital technology-based system for heart failure management
A combination of a provider-facing desktop and mobile application with a patient-facing mobile application that is integrated with a remote blood pressure cuff, heart rate monitor, and scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: At Study completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of patients who assess the DOT-HF intervention as an acceptable method of post-discharge heart failure management. This will be assessed during a semi-structured interview between individual participants and a trained interviewer.
At Study completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Clinicians' Response to Notification
Time Frame: At Study completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of DOT-HF clinician notifications that lead to a clinician response over the 12-week follow-up period. Each of the clinician DOT-HF notifications are detailed below. These include notification of eligible therapy adjustment, worsening patient-reported health status, and weight gain. Eligible clinician actions include medication changes or new telephone, video, or in-person clinic encounters in response to the notification.
At Study completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Patients' Engagement score
Time Frame: At Study completion (12-week follow-up visit)
A weighted proportion of requested actions completed by the patient. These actions include daily blood pressure measurements, daily weight assessment, daily health status assessment, biweekly KCCQ-12 assessment, and review of educational videos and health summary data. The minimum score is 0% and maximum score is 100%.
At Study completion (12-week follow-up visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustainability of DOT-HF technology for Patients
Time Frame: At 6 week, At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Sustainability will also be assessed via semi-structured interview questions to assess patient's and clinician's interest in continuing to use the DOT-HF intervention.
At 6 week, At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Feasibility of DOT-HF technology for Patients
Time Frame: At Study Completion (12 week follow up visit)
Feasibility will be assessed via semi-structured interview questions to assess barriers to use the DOT-HF intervention.
At Study Completion (12 week follow up visit)
Utility of DOT-HF technology for Clinicians
Time Frame: At study completion (12 week follow up visit)

Clinician perception of the utility of DOT-HF will be assessed based on clinician actions in response to DOT-HF notifications. We will assess each of the types of notifications aggregated in co-primary endpoint #3:

  • Notification of eligible therapy adjustment
  • Worsening patient-reported health status
  • Weight gain

For each endpoint, we will separately evaluate the proportion of notifications that were followed by a medication adjustment and the proportion that were followed by a previously unplanned encounter between the clinician/clinic nurse and the patient.

At study completion (12 week follow up visit)
Acceptability of DOT-HF technology for Clinicians
Time Frame: At study completion (12 week follow up visit)
Clinician perception of the acceptability of DOT-HF will be assessed by clinician responses to a survey administered at the end of the study and semi-structured interview.
At study completion (12 week follow up visit)
Generalizability of the DOT-HF Intervention
Time Frame: At study completion (12 week follow up visit)
The generalizability of our study will be evaluated by comparing sociodemographic data between participants and eligible individuals who decline participation. Sociodemographics include age, gender, and race.
At study completion (12 week follow up visit)
Proportion of days with weight assessed
Time Frame: At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of days weight is recorded by the participant using the ENGAGE-HF app. The minimum is 0% and maximum is 100%.
At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Proportion of days with daily health status completed
Time Frame: At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of days daily health status is recorded by the participant using the ENGAGE-HF app. The minimum is 0% and maximum is 100%.
At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Proportion of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 assessments completed
Time Frame: At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of biweekly periods that the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 health status is recorded by the participant using the ENGAGE-HF app. The minimum is 0% and maximum is 100%.
At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Proportion of days with medication adherence assessed
Time Frame: At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of days medication adherence is recorded by the participant using the ENGAGE-HF app. The minimum is 0% and maximum is 100%.
At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Score
Time Frame: Baseline, At study completion (12 week follow-up visit)
A score based on the heart failure medications prescribed. The minimum score is 0% and maximum score is 100%.
Baseline, At study completion (12 week follow-up visit)
Proportion of days with blood pressure (systolic) assessed
Time Frame: At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)
The proportion of days blood pressure (systolic) is recorded by the participant using the ENGAGE-HF app. The minimum is 0% and maximum is 100%.
At Study Completion (12-week follow-up visit)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alex Sandhu, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 67924

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on A combination of a provider-facing desktop and mobile application with a patient-facing mobile application

3
Subscribe