- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03697538
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) vs Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
The Effect of Femoral Nerve Block Versus Adductor Canal Block on the Quality of Recovery for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Prospective Randomized Blinded Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult male or female patients ages 18-80 scheduled for elective revision TKA.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I -III
- Mentally competent and able to give consent for enrollment in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with any contraindications to regional anesthesia such as infection, nerve injury, anticoagulation.
- Patient refusal.
- Patients with an allergy to local anesthetics or systemic opioids.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Adductor Canal Block
A 20g catheter will be introduced and advanced 2-3 cm beyond the tip of the needle under ultrasound visualization.
After needle withdrawal, catheter placement will be checked by visualizing local anesthetic spread under ultrasound.
0.5% ropivacaine will be used for catheter placement.
At the conclusion of surgery, the catheters will be connected to a pump that will infuse ropivacaine 0.2% at 6 mL/hr with a patient controlled bolus of 5mL and a lockout of 30 minutes.
|
A 20g catheter will be introduced and advanced 2-3 cm beyond the tip of the needle under ultrasound visualization.
After needle withdrawal, catheter placement will be checked by visualizing local anesthetic spread under ultrasound.
0.5% ropivacaine will be used for catheter placement.
At the conclusion of surgery, the catheters will be connected to a pump that will infuse ropivacaine 0.2% at 6 mL/hr with a patient controlled bolus of 5mL and a lockout of 30 minutes.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Femoral Nerve Block
A 20g catheter will be introduced and advanced 2-3 cm beyond the tip of the needle under ultrasound visualization.
After needle withdrawal, catheter placement will be checked by visualizing local anesthetic spread under ultrasound.
0.5% ropivacaine will be used for catheter placement.
At the conclusion of surgery, the catheters will be connected to a pump that will infuse ropivacaine 0.2% at 6 mL/hr with a patient controlled bolus of 5mL and a lockout of 30 minutes.
|
A 20g catheter will be introduced and advanced 2-3 cm beyond the tip of the needle under ultrasound visualization.
After needle withdrawal, catheter placement will be checked by visualizing local anesthetic spread under ultrasound.
0.5% ropivacaine will be used for catheter placement.
At the conclusion of surgery, the catheters will be connected to a pump that will infuse ropivacaine 0.2% at 6 mL/hr with a patient controlled bolus of 5mL and a lockout of 30 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Quality of recovery-15 item questionnaire (QoR): QoR-15
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
|
Our primary objective will be to determine if FNBs will result in improved quality of recovery (QoR-15) compared with ACBs (at 48 hours). The questionnaire is 15 questions with a scale from 0-10 on each and composed of two parts; part A and Part B scoring for questions in part A ( questions from 1-10) are scored from 0-10 where 0=none of the time( poor), and 10= all of the time (excellent). Part Bare questions from 11-15 where they are scored from (10-0) where 10=none of the time ( excellent) and 0=all of the time ( poor). The sum of all answers are added together |
48 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours post-op
|
Opioid requirements during hospitalization will be measured.
Total opioid consumption during this time period after surgery will be standardized to morphine equivalent doses and calculated on a milligram basis for this time period or until discharge, whichever occurs first
|
48 hours post-op
|
Pain score measurement: we will use Numeric rating scale for measurement (NRS)
Time Frame: 48 hours post-op
|
Pain scores on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0= no pain and 10= the worst pain ever.
the scores will be assessed every 8 hours from nursing documentation through 48 hours or until discharge, whichever occurs first
|
48 hours post-op
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nabil M Elkassabany, MD, MSCE, University of Pennsylvania
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 829859
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
Limacorporate S.p.aRecruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty | Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited Kingdom, Portugal, Slovakia
-
DePuy OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingRevision Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited States, Netherlands, New Zealand, France, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Switzerland
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsUnknownRevision Total Knee Arthroplasty | Revision Total Hip ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingAseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty | Total Knee Arthroplasty With Exchange of at Least One Prosthetic ComponentCanada
-
Rush University Medical CenterMayo ClinicCompletedRevision Total Knee Arthroplasty | Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty | Acute Blood Loss AnemiaUnited States
-
University of AarhusOdense University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Vejle Hospital; Gødstrup... and other collaboratorsRecruitingRevision Total Hip ArthroplastyDenmark
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyAesculap AGUnknownRevision Total Knee Arthroplasty Because of | Loosening | Instability | Impingement | or Other Reasons Accepted as Indications for TKA Exchange. | The Focus is to Determine the Precision of Joint Line Restoration in Navigated vs. Conventional Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyGermany
-
Aesculap AGTerminatedTotal Hip Arthroplasty RevisionGermany
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedRevision Total Hip Arthroplasty (RTHA)
-
University of LiegeCompletedRevision of Total Hip ArthroplastyBelgium
Clinical Trials on Nerve Block for pain control post-revision total knee arthroplasty
-
Wayne State UniversityCompleted
-
Wayne State UniversityRecruitingOpioid Use | Post-operative Pain, AcuteUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoPlanned Parenthood Federation of AmericaTerminatedPain | Abortion LateUnited States