Counseling for Harm Reduction and Retention in Medication-assisted Treatment - Cherokee Nation (CHaRRM-CN)

February 6, 2024 updated by: Lonnie Nelson, Washington State University

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of a program meant to enhance Counseling for Harm Reduction and Retention in MAT in Cherokee Nation (CHaRRM-CN). The main questions it aims to answer are whether CHaRRM-CN: improves retention of patients in MAT, decreases substance-related harm and illicit opioid use, and increases cultural connectedness.

After providing written, informed consent, participants will attend a baseline assessement and will then be randomized to either the CHaRRM-CN or treatment as usual group. For 6 months after randomization, participants will be exposed to CHaRRM-CN or treatment as usual. During that time, participants will also attend the 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-ups to track their progress through the programs.

After the 6 months of either treatment condition, investigators will compare the groups to see if they differ on retention, substance-use outcomes and Native enculturation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The opioid epidemic disproportionately impacts the American Indian (AI) population, which experiences an 88% higher prevalence of OUDs (1.5%) than the US general population (0.8%). The AI population is second only to non-Latinx whites in their experience of opioid overdose deaths (13.9 and 17.5 per 100,000, respectively). Fortunately, medication-assisted treatment (MAT; e.g., buprenorphine + naloxone) is highly effective for reducing opioid-related harm, including overdose, making it the gold-standard OUD treatment approach. A systematic review showed a median retention of 56% at the NIDA-recommended 12-month treatment length. However, most AI people with OUD do not attend traditional substance-use treatment (62%). This is concerning because treatment retention is strongly associated with a mortality rate reduction. Although no studies have documented OUD treatment outcomes specific to AI patients, research in Native communities has generally highlighted concerns about the cultural acceptability of the highly directive, Western medical substance-use treatment approaches (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy, 12-step programming) that are widely available. Further, previous research has indicated that AI patients with substance use disorders want greater representation of Native staff and better integration of culturally adapted approaches in the services they receive. Culturally adapted approaches to treatment are associated with reductions in use and associated harm. However, there are currently no evidence-based, culturally adapted counseling approaches for AI patients addressing MAT retention and opioid-related harm. Accordingly, the investigators are conducting a 2-phase R61/R33 development and evaluation project. The 2-year R61 Phase has been completed and entailed two parts. First, the investigators conducted a mixed methods inquiry to inform research methods and to create a community-specific, cultural adaptation of an existing, efficacious, harm-reduction counseling approach. Second, the investigators co-created and manualized the resulting Counseling for Harm Reduction and Retention in MAT at Cherokee Nation (CHaRRM-CN) together with a community advisory board comprising CNHS providers, staff, and patients as well as researchers from Cherokee Nation, Washington State University, and the University of Washington. The current, 3-year R33 Phase entails a 2-arm RCT (N=160) conducted within CNHS testing the efficacy of CHaRRM-CN in improving 6-month MAT retention, reducing substance-related harm and illicit opioid use, and increasing Native enculturation compared to a treatment-as-usual control condition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

190

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Susan E Collins, PhD
  • Phone Number: 2068327885
  • Email: collinss@uw.edu

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Tahlequah, Oklahoma, United States, 74464
        • Recruiting
        • Cherokee Nation Health Services
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Terrence Kominsky, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ashley Lincoln, MSW
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Active, not recruiting
        • University of Washington School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 18 years of age
  2. Must be newly registered (within 4 weeks) in the CNHS MAT Program. (Prior patients can participate as long as their most recent treatment course was at least 6 months prior).
  3. Must be willing to provide written informed consent to enroll in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal or inability to consent to participation in research. (The latter is assessed using the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent.)
  2. Refusal or inability to consent and constituting a risk to the safety and security of other patients or staff

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
The TAU condition will entail the current CNHS MAT program for OUD.
TAU entails medication to support patients' recovery (i.e., the partial opioid agonist, buprenorophine + naloxone/ Suboxone gel films), in-person case management and behavioral health intervention (i.e., in-person group and individual counseling), and referrals to other health care and behavioral health services.
Experimental: CHaRRM-CN
The CHaRRM-CN condition comprises changes and additions to TAU codesigned with a community advisory board and taking into account suggestions from MAT patients and community members impacted by OUD with the goal of improving MAT retention in culturally aligned and community-driven ways.
The CHaRRM-CN intervention includes changes and additions to TAU to make MAT more culturally aligned (i.e., offering regular community-based, cultural programming; offering culturally aligned healing groups in the MAT program, such as Talking Circles and beading group) as well as lower barrier and incentivized (i.e., offering medication and behavioral health appointments via in-person, videoconference or telephone; offering harm-reduction groups in addition to abstinence-based groups; providing mailed and in-person pick-up options for buprenorphine prescriptions; conducting weekly chart reviews to ensure prescriptions and basic needs are continuously met; bimonthly, automated text outreach; contingency management supporting attendance at in-person or telehealth appointments).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MAT retention
Time Frame: Month 6
MAT program retention is defined by an active prescription for buprenorphine+naloxone with no gaps ≥ 30 days at month 6. This measure will dichotomously indicate whether participants have been retained in the MAT program (1) or not (0) at month 6.
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance-related harm
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
The Short Inventory of Problems will be used to collect data on substance-related harm in the past month. The range of possible scores on the single summary score is 0-45, and higher scores indicate a greater experience of substance-related harm. Change will be measured across the 4 points listed in the time frame.
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
Native enculturation
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
The Cultural Connectedness Scale - Short Version is a 10-item Likert type measure consisting of 3 dimensions: identity, traditions, and spirituality. Criterion validity was demonstrated with cultural connectedness dimensions adequately correlating with other indicators of wellness. Greater scores indicate greater cultural connectedness. Change will be measured across the 4 points listed in the time frame.
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
Native self-reliance
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
The Cherokee Self-Reliance Questionnaire includes 24, Likert-scale items that have been psychometrically validated in previous research.60,61 Consistent with the Cherokee self-reliance concept, the instrument comprises 3 factors: being responsible, disciplined, and confident. The higher the scale scores the higher the Native self-reliance. Change will be measured across the 4 points listed in the time frame.
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
Illicit Opioid Use
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
The Timeline Followback (TLFB) uses calendars for a retrospective evaluation of daily substance use. Meta-analyses have indicated the TLFB is a psychometrically sound way to detect substance use, including opioid use, across various populations and study designs. In the proposed study, the TLFB will be primarily used to assess use of illicit opioids. Change will be measured across the 4 points listed in the time frame.
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
ED visits
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6
CNHS ED administrative data to assess number of visits to the ED both 6-months pre- and post-study enrollment. Change will be measured between the 2 points listed in the time frame.
Baseline, month 6

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6
The EuroQoL-5 Dimensional-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized 5-item, 5-point Likert-type measure of health-related QoL. This widely used, easily administered and psychometrically sound measure comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Additionally, a single, 100-point vertical visual analogue scale serves as a quantitative measure of participants' self-reported overall health status. The higher the scores, the higher the HR-QoL. This is an exploratory measure. Change will be measured across the 4 points listed in the time frame.
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lonnie A Nelson, PhD, Washington State University
  • Principal Investigator: Susan E Collins, PhD, University of Washington
  • Principal Investigator: Ashley Lincoln, MSW, Cherokee Nation Health Services

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Treatment as usual (TAU)

3
Subscribe