A Patient-centered Trial of a Process-of-care Intervention in Hospitalized AKI Patients: the COPE-AKI Trial (COPE-AKI)

September 6, 2023 updated by: Kaleab Abebe, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Caring for OutPatiEnts After Acute Kidney Injury (COPE-AKI) Trial

The COPE-AKI study is a randomized, pragmatic, parallel-arm trial comparing a multimodal intervention to usual care on hospital-free days through 90 days of study follow up. The primary study hypothesis is that patients randomized to the intervention will have increased odds of more hospital-free days through 90 days (primary clinical) compared to those randomized to usual care. Key secondary hypotheses will investigate the impact of the intervention on rates of major adverse kidney events, rates of recurrent AKI, and changes in patient-reported outcomes. Participants (N=2145) will be allocated 1:1 to the intervention or usual care using a web-based system to maintain allocation concealment using stratified randomization with randomly permuted blocks. Randomization will be stratified by clinical site.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary study hypotheses for the COPE-AKI study are: compared to usual care, patients randomized to a multimodal intervention will have increased odds of more hospital-free days through 90 days (primary) and lower rates of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) at 180 days, lower rates of recurrent AKI at 180 days, and greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes over 90 days (secondary).

The primary outcome is hospital-free days through 90 days of follow up, defined as 90 minus the number of calendar days in the hospital as either an inpatient or on observation status, based on the determination made by the corresponding hospital. Key secondary outcomes include: rates of MAKE (measured at 90, 180, and 365 days), rates of recurrent AKI (90, 180, and 365 days), and 4 patient-report outcomes: global health related quality of life, AKI-specific health related quality of life, provider interactions, and social support (30, 90, 180, 365 days).

A multimodal process-of-care intervention that includes 1) study physician oversight and follow up care recommendations at the time of hospital discharge; 2) involvement of a nurse navigator to provide kidney-disease related education, coordinate care, and assess symptoms; and 3) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and review. Participants in the usual care arm will be provided information about their kidney disease, nephrotoxins to be avoided, and the importance of follow up with a physician will be emphasized.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2145

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Beata Pasek, EdD
  • Phone Number: 412-246-6931
  • Email: bbp10@pitt.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:
          • Patricia Busta
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Javier Neyra, MD
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Yale University
        • Contact:
          • Stephanie Perez
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Francis Wilson, MD
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Maryland
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Matthew Weir, MD
        • Contact:
          • Shannon Hawkins, BSN
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
        • Contact:
          • Pam Corona Villalobos, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chirag Parikh, MD PhD
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
        • Contact:
          • Savannah Gagnon, BS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emilio Poggio, MD
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • Not yet recruiting
        • MetroHealth
        • Contact:
          • Maria Figueroa
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Edward Horwitz, MD
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Recruiting
        • Vanderbilt University
        • Contact:
          • Kailey Pope, BS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Edward Siew, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged ≥ 18 years
  2. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Stage 2/3 AKI with evidence of persistent AKI (defined as meeting Stage 2+ AKI for 2 consecutive days with serum creatinine concentration measurements >12 hours apart)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. AKI due to primary glomerulonephritis, renal vasculitis, or thrombotic microangiopathy
  2. Diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) at the time of admission, defined as:

    1. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73m2
    2. Previous kidney transplant recipient
    3. On chronic dialysis
  3. Acute urinary obstruction with rapid kidney function improvement following relief of obstruction
  4. Index hospitalization involving nephrectomy
  5. Index hospitalization involving solid organ transplant or stem cell/bone marrow transplant
  6. Continued dialysis dependence at time of discharge
  7. Previous (within 6 months) or new referral to a nephrologist for care specifically for:

    1. Previous or new diagnosis of glomerulonephritis
    2. Primary electrolyte imbalance disorders unrelated to AKI (e.g., syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, Bartter syndrome)
    3. Active treatment for acute interstitial nephritis
  8. Non-kidney end-organ failure:

    1. Class IV congestive heart failure
    2. Decompensated cirrhosis with Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) > 30 or those with a diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome by the clinical teams
    3. End-stage pulmonary disease (advanced stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension)
  9. Metastatic malignancy or malignancy requiring active treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy), such as multiple myeloma
  10. Primary goal of care is palliation: life expectancy <6 months
  11. Pregnancy
  12. Vulnerable populations

    1. Persons incarcerated
    2. Persons institutionalized
  13. Inability to provide informed consent

    a. Impaired cognition as demonstrated by the Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM)

  14. Concurrent enrollment in a separate greater than minimal risk interventional trial
  15. Inability to participate in either in-person or remote visits

    a. Inability to participate as determined by the research team at time of discharge based on disposition (vs uniform decision across site about exclusion based on SNF)

  16. Discharge to long-term acute care facility or other hospital-based location

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multimodal Process of Care Intervention
A multimodal process-of-care intervention that includes 1) study physician oversight and follow up care recommendations at the time of hospital discharge; 2) involvement of a nurse navigator to provide kidney-disease related education, coordinate care, and assess symptoms; and 3) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and review.
The nephrologist and/or nephrology-associated advanced practice provider (APP) at each site will lead the intervention team for the duration of the study. The study physicians will fulfil two main roles: (a) Provide supervision to the rest of the study team and (b) conduct a discharge assessment to triage and make recommendations for follow-up care.
The nurse navigator will be the primary contact for the participants assigned to the intervention group for the study. The navigator will obtain contact information, information about the patient's usual care providers and pharmacy, review medications, show the participant how to use the home blood pressure machine and scales and arrange for follow-up visits. The role of the nurse navigator will be to monitor the participant's medical condition; facilitate scheduling of needed medical follow-up including both routine (pre-scheduled) and ad hoc (urgent or emergency); enhance adherence with prescribed medical care and follow-up appointments; and serve as a resource to the patient to answer questions about their AKI-related management, facilitate medical and associated care and provide enhanced psychosocial support.
The pharmacist will complete the medication reconciliation and medication regimen review per the predetermined checklist, via telemedicine if agreeable to the patient. The goal of the patient/caregiver-pharmacist interaction is to cover the following: avoidance of nephrotoxins when possible and appropriate, appropriate dosing of renally cleared drugs, review for drug-drug interactions, monitoring appropriate use of chronic medications, medication adherence, monitor for adverse drug reactions, evaluation of non-prescription medication use, medication/disease education and social support.
Written information about kidney disease, nephrotoxins to be avoided and importance/need for follow up with a physician will be provided.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
After receiving the same written information about kidney disease, nephrotoxins to be avoided and importance/need for follow up with a physician as individuals randomized to the multimodal intervention arm, participants randomized to the control arm will receive usual care as specified by their treating providers and will not be followed by nurse navigator, pharmacist, or the study team. The only subsequent study-related activities will be the follow-up study visits for ascertainment of endpoints with the research coordinator.
Written information about kidney disease, nephrotoxins to be avoided and importance/need for follow up with a physician will be provided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital-Free Days (HFDs) through day 90
Time Frame: 90 days
Hospital-free days through day 90 defined as 90 minus the number of calendar days in the hospital as either an inpatient or on observation status.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) at 180 days
Time Frame: 180 days

MAKE-180 composite outcome of death, dialysis and assessment of kidney function defined as:

  • death within 180 days of index hospital discharge;
  • need for dialysis at 180 days after index hospital discharge; or
  • serum creatinine >2x baseline at 180 days after index hospital discharge
180 days
Recurrent Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Hospitalization at 180 days
Time Frame: 180 days
Episodes of recurrent AKI during subsequent all-cause hospitalizations will be adjudicated based on hospitalization data, defining recurrent episodes of AKI based on an increase in serum creatinine of >50% relative to the lowest-known value preceding or including the rehospitalization.
180 days
Change from baseline in Global Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) at 180 days.
Time Frame: 180 days
HR-QOL will be assessed with the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) HRQoL measure. The PROMIS Global Health measures assess an individual's physical, mental, and social health. The measures are generic, rather than disease-specific, and often use an "In General" item context as it is intended to globally reflect individuals' assessment of their health. The adult PROMIS Global Health measure produces two scores: Physical Health and Mental Health, which are rescaled into a standardized score (T-score) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured. Thus, a person who has T-scores of 60 for the Global Physical Health or Global Mental Health scales is one standard deviation better (more healthy) than the general population.
180 days
Change from baseline in AKI-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) at 180 days.
Time Frame: 180 days
AKI-Specific HR-QOL will be assessed with the 6-item Chronic Kidney Disease Quality of Life (CKD-QoL) measure. The CKD-QoL comprehensively represents CKD-specific quality of life and yields a single summary impact score. Norm-based scoring is used (linearly transformed to have a mean of 50 and an SD of 10) in which a higher score indicates worse QOL impact.
180 days
Change from baseline in Interactions with Providers at 180 days.
Time Frame: 180 days
Provider interactions will be assessed with the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) and 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) measures. The PEPPI provides a summary score ranging for 5 to 25 (25 = sighted patient self-efficacy). The CSQ-8 is a structured survey used to assess level of satisfaction with care. Items are scored on a Likert scale from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction) with different descriptors for each response point. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
180 days
Change from baseline in Social Support at 180 days.
Time Frame: 180 days
Social support will be assessed with the 4-item PROMIS Emotional Support and 4-item PROMIS Instrumental Support short forms. The Emotional Support and Instrumental Support measures each produce a summary score, which are rescaled into a standardized score (T-score) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. A higher T-score represents more of the concept being measured. Thus, a person who has a T-score of 60 is one standard deviation better (more healthy) than the general population.
180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kaleab Abebe, PhD, Univerisity of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Linda Fried, MD, University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Palevsky, MD, University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Sandy Kane-Gill, PharmD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 5, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 5, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY21080024
  • 1U01DK130010 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1U01DK129989 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1U01DK129980 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1U01DK129984 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study participant research data, which is for purposes of statistical analysis and scientific reporting, will be transmitted to and stored at the University of Pittsburgh Data Coordinating Center (DCC). This will not include the participant's contact or identifying information. Rather, individual participants and their research data will be identified by a unique study identification number. The study data entry and study management systems used by clinical sites and by the DCC research staff will be secured and password protected. At the end of the study, all study databases will be de-identified and archived at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Central Repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data collected for this study will be analyzed and stored at the University of Pittsburgh Scientific & Data Research Center (SDRC). Six months after publication of the primary manuscript or 18 months after study completion, whichever occurs first, the de-identified, archived data will be transmitted to and stored at the NIDDK Central Repository, for use by other researchers including those outside of the study. Permission to transmit data to the NIDDK Central Repository will be included in the informed consent.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Kidney Injury

Clinical Trials on Study Physician/Advance Practice Provider

3
Subscribe