Ultrasound Imaging of Fibrotic Tissue

November 6, 2023 updated by: Zhou Mouwang, Peking University Third Hospital

Ultrasound Imaging of Fibrotic Tissue Using Machine Learning

This project intends to collect the ultrasonic spectrum information of shoulder and knee joint fibrotic tissue, and use machine learning to study the mechanism of fibrosis tissue ultrasound imaging, and then build a model and finally establish the relationship between joint stiffness and fibrosis formation. In this study, the broadband ultrasound imaging method for joint fibrosis has the potential to create a method for ultrasonic localization, staining and evaluation of joint fibrosis, laying the foundation for the research of new conservative treatment methods and surgical positioning for fibrosis, and for reducing the occurrence of joint fibrosis rate, improve joint function of patients, and return to family and society earlier and better

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Buwen Yao

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Joint stiffness patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Unilateral shoulder or knee joint stiffness and normal on the opposite side
  2. The course of the disease is longer than 3 months
  3. Good cognitive function, able to understand the content of this experiment, willing to cooperate with follow-up
  4. Over 18 years old, voluntarily participate in this study, and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Wound non-healing, joint dislocation or unstable fracture fixation, pseudarthrosis, joint purulent infection and other contraindications for joint range of motion examination
  2. There are skin lesions, wounds or allergies to the coupling agent on the joint surface and other conditions that cannot be used for ultrasound examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy
Healthy group is recruited. They would not receive any intervention. The ultrasound imaging data will be collected to serve as the comparison for no fibrosis joint.
Arthrosis of knee
People with arthrosis of the knee joint will be treated using the traditional intervention, which includes physical therapy. The ultrasound imaging will be collected before the intervention and at 3-month. The imaging data will be used to build a imaging model using the machine learning method.
All arthrosis participants will be treated as the traditional methods using physical therapy.
arthrosis of shoulder
People with arthrosis of the shoulder joint will be treated using the traditional intervention, which includes physical therapy. The ultrasound imaging will be collected before the intervention and at 3-month. The imaging data will be used to build a imaging model using the machine learning method.
All arthrosis participants will be treated as the traditional methods using physical therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KOOS score
Time Frame: 3-month
The KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) survey is a health questionnaire used to assess the impact of knee injury or osteoarthritis on patients. It has 42 questions covering 5 domains and is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The KOOS survey is a reliable and valid tool used in research and clinical practice to assess treatment effectiveness and track symptom changes over time.
3-month
CM score
Time Frame: 3-month
The Constant-Murley survey is a health questionnaire used to evaluate shoulder function and pain. It consists of four domains: pain, activities of daily living, range of motion, and strength. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The Constant-Murley survey is a reliable and valid tool used in research and clinical practice to assess treatment effectiveness and track symptom changes over time.
3-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SF-36
Time Frame: 3-month
The SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Survey) is a health questionnaire used to measure general health and well-being. It consists of 36 questions that evaluate eight domains, including physical functioning, role limitations, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The SF-36 survey is a widely used and reliable tool used in research and clinical practice to assess health status and well-being.
3-month
WOMAC
Time Frame: 3-month
The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) survey is a health questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of osteoarthritis in the knee and hip joints. It consists of 24 questions that evaluate three domains, including pain, stiffness, and physical function. The scale ranges from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The WOMAC survey is a reliable and valid tool used in research and clinical practice to assess treatment effectiveness and track symptom changes over time.
3-month
HSS-KS
Time Frame: 3-month
The HSS (Hospital for Special Surgery) survey is a health questionnaire used to assess patient outcomes after total hip or knee replacement surgery. It consists of 40 questions that evaluate patient pain, function, and satisfaction with the surgery. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The HSS survey is a reliable and valid tool used in research and clinical practice to assess treatment effectiveness and track patient satisfaction and function over time.
3-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M2022793

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthrofibrosis of Knee

Clinical Trials on Physical Therapy

3
Subscribe