Expressive Writing for Caregivers of Persons With Cancer

June 30, 2023 updated by: Arizona State University

A Community-based Video-conference-delivered Expressive Writing Intervention for Caregivers of Persons With Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effects of an expressive writing intervention for caregivers of persons with cancer. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  1. Does participation in a group-based, videoconference-delivered expressive writing intervention improve mood and quality of life for caregivers of persons with cancer?
  2. Is greater improvement associated with writing that is more emotionally expressive or personally revealing, or with group-based sessions characterized by certain linguistic features such as greater emotionality?
  3. Is benefit greater for certain subgroups of caregivers, such as those who are younger or who identify as female in gender?

Participants will be asked to join four videoconference-delivered, group-based expressive writing sessions. This will be done in groups of 4-8 caregivers and led by a trained facilitator. During each session, participants will write about their deepest thoughts and feelings about their loved one's cancer and their experiences as a caregiver. They will then discuss as a group any reactions to the writing process.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either active intervention (receiving the intervention as soon as a group is formed) or waitlist control. Researchers will compare active and waitlist control participants on to pre- to post-intervention changes in mood and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

A diagnosis of cancer reverberates throughout the family. Family caregivers take on a wide range of responsibilities, such as monitoring medical symptoms, communicating with the patient's medical team, managing insurance claims, providing transportation, and assisting with activities of daily living. Psychological distress is common. Caregivers often feel unprepared for their role, and socially isolated from others. Physical impacts have also been documented, from fatigue to sleep disturbance to immune dysfunction. To alleviate some of these difficult sequelae of cancer caregiving, we propose to test the utility of a brief, low-cost, non-pharmacologic, behavioral intervention for persons providing care for a loved one with cancer. Specifically, we will test the effects of an expressive writing (EW) intervention. The basic paradigm asks participants to write for 20 minutes on four separate occasions about a trauma or stressor. Initial work conducted with undergraduate samples showed benefit of EW. Since then, EW studies have been conducted across a variety of populations including persons coping with chronic illness. Benefits have ranged from better lung function among asthmatics to fewer physical symptoms among women with breast cancer. One meta-analysis of 146 studies across 10,994 participants reported positive effect sizes (mental or physical health benefits) for 102 of the studies (70%). Notable gaps in this literature include testing with cancer caregivers (with some exceptions) and use of novel delivery formats.

Specific aims are: (1) To examine the effects of a group-based, videoconference-delivered EW program on emotional, social, and physical well-being among informal caregivers of persons diagnosed with cancer; (2) To identify social and linguistic mechanisms by which participation in the group-based EW intervention may improve distress; and (3) To identify potential moderators of benefit including age, gender identity, relationship to the patient, and baseline social constraints.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
        • Recruiting
        • Cancer Support Community Arizona
        • Contact:
          • Jennifer Sander

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Self-identify as informal caregiver for an adult (age 18+) diagnosed with stage II-IV breast, ovarian, prostate, colon, rectal, or lung cancer within the past 2 years
  • English speaking and comprehending
  • Access to a desktop computer, laptop, tablet or smartphone and Wireless Fidelity (WIFI) to complete surveys and participate in videoconference-based expressive writing sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

-Caregiver for pediatric cancer patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active intervention
Participants will attend four group-based expressive writing sessions led by a trained facilitator. All sessions will be delivered via videoconference. Sessions will occur weekly over the course of 4 consecutive weeks and will not exceed 60 minutes in length. Each session will include a 15- to 20-minute writing stint whereby participants are asked to write about their deepest thoughts and feelings regarding their loved one's cancer and their role as caregiver. All participants will be given a Rocketbook for this purpose, a spiral notebook that has the look and feel of a standard paper notebook but uses a pen with erasable ink. The writing stint will be followed by a group discussion; participants will be invited to share what they wrote about (if so desired) and their reactions to the writing process. Each session will end with a debriefing and erasure of the writing content just created. This will ensure privacy of the material and may be perceived as cleansing.
4 videoconference-delivered group-based expressive writing sessions
Placebo Comparator: Waitlist control
Procedures are exactly the same as for the experimental arm but delayed.
4 videoconference-delivered group-based expressive writing sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological distress
Time Frame: change from baseline psychological distress at 6 weeks
Profile of Mood States, 2nd edition (0-4, higher values indicate greater distress)
change from baseline psychological distress at 6 weeks
Quality of life, general
Time Frame: change from baseline quality of life at 6 weeks
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Abbreviated version (0-100, higher values indicate greater quality of life)
change from baseline quality of life at 6 weeks
Quality of life, caregiver-specific
Time Frame: change from baseline caregiver-specific quality of life at 6 weeks
Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (0-140, higher values indicate greater quality of life)
change from baseline caregiver-specific quality of life at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression
Time Frame: change from baseline depression at 6 weeks
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 (0-30, higher values indicate greater depression)
change from baseline depression at 6 weeks
Perceived stress
Time Frame: change from baseline perceived stress at 6 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale (0-40, higher values indicate greater stress)
change from baseline perceived stress at 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00017135

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data will be made available to other researchers

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 6 months of publication of study results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be provided on a case by case basis, after review of the requestor's proposed use for the data. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator and at least one other investigator.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Expressive writing intervention

3
Subscribe