Effects of Yoga on Women With Breast Cancer

September 20, 2023 updated by: Shamay Ng, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Effects of Yoga on Physical Functioning and Sleep Quality of Women With Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Upper limb complications and sleep disturbances are prevalent, persistent, and serious health problems in women with breast cancer. However, these problems are underrecognized in clinical practice and thus have substantial adverse impacts on the health and quality of life of women with breast cancer. As yoga practices have been shown to improve physical and psychological health in people with cancer, such practices may also alleviate upper limb complications and sleep disturbances in women with breast cancer. However, there are few evidence-based guidelines or protocols to support the integration of yoga therapy into clinical practice for managing the health conditions of women with breast cancer. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of yoga therapy on improving the upper limb functions, sleep quality, and quality of life in women with breast cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, accounting for 12% of all new cancer cases annually, and there were an estimated 2.3 million new cases worldwide in 2020. Contemporary breast cancer treatments have improved therapeutic outcomes. However, these treatments cause adverse effects; for example, more than half of women with breast cancer experience treatment-related comorbidities.

Over 60% of women with breast cancer have reported experiencing ipsilateral upper limb complications immediately post-treatment and these complications may become chronic or permanent disorders. Upper limb dysfunction is a long-term complication that comprises a complex range of symptoms and disorders, including lymphedema, pain, decreased joint mobility and muscle strength, sensory alterations, and neuropathies. Another prevalent and persistent problem that has been reported is sleep disturbance. According to a recent review, the prevalence of sleep disturbance ranged from 14 to 90% [pooled estimated 0.4; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.52], and the persistence rate has been found to be more than 50%. Such side effects may lead to individual suffering and economic burdens, and can compromise the quality of life of women with breast cancer. Thus, the management of treatment-related side effects is an important part of the supportive care of women with breast cancer.

Yoga is based on ancient India philosophy, and emphasizes the integration of postures, breathing, and meditation. This mind-body practice has gained popularity over the last decades and serves as a complementary approach that is commonly used for various health conditions. This safe and trendy exercise holds attractive to female target participants. Yoga combines joint movements and breathing exercises that can help the lungs to expand, resulting in the stretching of muscles and thus increasing lymphatic circulation, which improves upper limb function. Besides, Yoga combines physical activity with mindful elements consisting of breathing and meditative practices. The practice of such mindfulness with the engagement of skeletal muscles represents a holistic approach that may decrease sleep disturbance.

Upper limb complications and sleep disturbances are prevalent, persistent, and serious health problems in women with breast cancer. However, these problems are underrecognized in clinical practice and thus have substantial adverse impacts on the health and quality of life of women with breast cancer. As yoga practices have been shown to improve physical and psychological health in people with cancer, such practices may also alleviate upper limb complications and sleep disturbances in women with breast cancer. However, there are few evidence-based guidelines or protocols to support the integration of yoga therapy into clinical practice for managing the health conditions of women with breast cancer. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of yoga therapy on improving the upper limb functions, sleep quality, and quality of life in women with breast cancer. The research hypothesis of this study were (1) improvements in upper limb functions and sleep quality, could be observed in the experimental group across the assessment time points and (2) the experimental group should have better upper limb performance and sleep parameters than the control group immediately after Yoga intervention and also at the follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shamay SM Ng, PhD
    • Kowloon
      • Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • A university-affiliated rehabilitation laboratory
        • Contact:
          • Sarah Wong, MSc
          • Phone Number: 39708750
        • Contact:
          • TW Liu, PhD
          • Phone Number: 39708714

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥18
  • Female
  • Normal cognitive function
  • Diagnosed with primary breast cancer of stage I-III
  • Completed cancer-related treatments (including surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy) at least 4 weeks before enrollment except conventional medical care (e.g., hormonal therapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with distant metastasis in non-breast body part
  • Diagnosed with significant diseases, such as cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, musculoskeletal (except upper-extremity problems secondary to breast cancer), endocrine, metabolic, and psychological disorders
  • Being pregnant
  • Prior experiences of practicing yoga

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Yoga group
Participants will receive yoga programme over a period of eight weeks
The yoga forms are designed from the modified traditional Hatha yoga style consisting of pranayama, asana, meditation with additional relaxation elements. The selected postures will engage core and upper limb muscle and which proposed to strengthen the whole body, increase flexibility of shoulder and limbs, particularly, improve upper limb mobility and functions; also, the progression of the yoga therapy is targeted to reach the variations of postures. The combined relaxation elements reinforced to achieve restoration of the body so as to improve sleep.
No Intervention: Control group
The participants in the control group will receive usual care, and complete all assessments on the same timeline as the intervention group. They will be offered yoga programme at the completion of the final measurement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper limb functional status, score range 0-100%, higher score means more severe disability
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins).
Will be assessed using the short form of the Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder-Hand Questionnaire (quickDASH-HKPWH)
T1: baseline (before the study begins).
Change from baseline Upper limb functional status at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be assessed using the short form of the Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder-Hand Questionnaire (quickDASH-HKPWH), score range 0-100%, higher score means more severe disability
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Upper limb functional status at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post-intervention (week 8)
Will be assessed using the short form of the Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder-Hand Questionnaire (quickDASH-HKPWH), score range 0-100%, higher score means more severe disability
T3: immediately post-intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Upper limb functional status at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be assessed using the short form of the Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder-Hand Questionnaire (quickDASH-HKPWH), score range 0-100%, higher score means more severe disability
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Sleep quality
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be assessed by the Chinese (for Hong Kong) version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means poorer sleep
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Sleep quality at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be assessed by the Chinese (for Hong Kong) version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means poorer sleep
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Sleep quality at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Will be assessed by the Chinese (for Hong Kong) version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means poorer sleep
T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Sleep quality at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be assessed by the Chinese (for Hong Kong) version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means poorer sleep
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper limb muscle strength
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be determined using a handheld dynamometer, measures muscle strength in kg, higher score means better muscle strength
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Upper limb muscle strength at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be determined using a handheld dynamometer, measures muscle strength in kg, higher score means better muscle strength
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Upper limb muscle strength at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Will be determined using a handheld dynamometer, measures muscle strength in kg, higher score means better muscle strength
T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Upper limb muscle strength at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be determined using a handheld dynamometer, measures muscle strength in kg, higher score means better muscle strength
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Shoulder mobility
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be determined by measuring the active range of motion using a goniometer, measures range of movement in degree, higher score means better shoulder flexibility
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Shoulder mobility at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be determined by measuring the active range of motion using a goniometer, measures range of movement in degree, higher score means better shoulder flexibility
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Shoulder mobility at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Will be determined by measuring the active range of motion using a goniometer, measures range of movement in degree, higher score means better shoulder flexibility
T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Shoulder mobility at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be determined by measuring the active range of motion using a goniometer, measures range of movement in degree, higher score means better shoulder flexibility
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Mood (including anxiety and depression symptoms)
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be assessed using The Cantonese/Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means more severe anxiety and depression
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Mood (including anxiety and depression symptoms) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be assessed using The Cantonese/Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means more severe anxiety and depression
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Mood (including anxiety and depression symptoms) at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Will be assessed using The Cantonese/Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means more severe anxiety and depression
T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Mood (including anxiety and depression symptoms) at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be assessed using The Cantonese/Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire, score range 0-21, higher score means more severe anxiety and depression
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Fatigue
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be assessed using the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale questionnaire, score range 10-50, higher score means more severe fatigue
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Fatigue at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be assessed using the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale questionnaire, score range 10-50, higher score means more severe fatigue
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Fatigue at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: mid-intervention (week 8)
Will be assessed using the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale questionnaire, score range 10-50, higher score means more severe fatigue
T3: mid-intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Fatigue at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be assessed using the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale questionnaire, score range 10-50, higher score means more severe fatigue
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be recorded over a 5-minute period using a validated wearable monitor
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Heart rate variability at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be recorded over a 5-minute period using a validated wearable monitor
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Heart rate variability at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Will be recorded over a 5-minute period using a validated wearable monitor
T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Heart rate variability at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be recorded over a 5-minute period using a validated wearable monitor
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Health-related quality of Life
Time Frame: T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Will be assessed by the Chinese-Traditional version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphedema questionnaire, score range 0-148, higher score means better quality of life
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline Health-related quality of Life at 4 weeks
Time Frame: T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Will be assessed by the Chinese-Traditional version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphedema questionnaire, score range 0-148, higher score means better quality of life
T2: mid-intervention (week 4)
Change from baseline Health-related quality of Life at 8 weeks
Time Frame: T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Will be assessed by the Chinese-Traditional version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphedema questionnaire, score range 0-148, higher score means better quality of life
T3: immediately post intervention (week 8)
Change from baseline Health-related quality of Life at 12 weeks
Time Frame: T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)
Will be assessed by the Chinese-Traditional version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphedema questionnaire, score range 0-148, higher score means better quality of life
T4: 1 month follow up (week 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023_Yoga_Breastcancer

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The datasets of the study will only be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after the findings being published in peer-reviewed journal.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Quality

Clinical Trials on Yoga

3
Subscribe