Effect of Heart Rate Control With Ivabradine on Hemodynamic in Patients With Sepsis

Effect of Heart Rate Control With Ivabradine on Hemodynamic in Patients With Sepsis: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Sepsis, a life-threatening syndrome, is often accompanied by tachycardia in spite of adequate volume resuscitation to correct hypovolemia and vasopressor medication to correct hypotension. Recently, relevant studies have shown that sustained tachycardia in sepsis was also related to high mortality, and appropriate control of heart rate could improve prognosis. Ivabradine reduces heart rate directly without a negative inotropic effect through inhibition of the If ionic current，which is absent from the traditional rate control drug (beta-blockers). This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label study designed to compare ivabradine with placebo on the difference of heart rate and haemodynamics in patients with sepsis.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Sepsis; Hemodynamics; Heart Rate Control; Ivabradine
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Ivabradine

Detailed Description

This study aims to enroll 172 patients with sepsis as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria and sinus tachycardia (HR ≥ 95 bpm) despite a hemodynamic optimization. Patients will be randomly assigned to standard treatment group (GS) or ivabradine group (GI，standard treatment for sepsis plus enteral ivabradine). Patients in GI, with a heart rate control target of 70 to 94bpm, received ivabradine within the first 96 hours after randomization, and overall participants are followed up to 28 days. The secondary outcomes include the difference in SOFA score, incidence of serious adverse events, need for organ support, length of ICU stay, and 28-day overall mortality.

Despite recent studies are limited, this study will investigate whether HR control using ivabradine is safe, feasible, and effective, and further enhance the understanding of ivabradine in patients with sepsis.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 172
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Zhenhui Zhang, PhD; Phone Number: +86 020 34153246; Email: zhzhhicu@126.com
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Weiyan Chen, PhD; Phone Number: +86 020 34153246; Email: sam11124@163.com

Study Locations

• China
  • Guangdong
    • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510260
      • Recruiting
      • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
      • Contact: Zhenhui Zhang, PhD; Phone Number: +86 02034153246
      • Principal Investigator: Weiyan Chen, PhD

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adult patients aged 18 years or above.
2. Being treated in an intensive care unit.
3. Sepsis is diagnosed according to Sepsis-3.0 criteria, which is defined as patients requiring antimicrobial agents due to confirmed or suspected infection, acute increase in the SOFA score at least 2 points.
4. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is maintained ≥65 mmHg with adequate volume resuscitation and vasopressor therapy. Volume resuscitation is considered adequate when Central Venous Pressure (CVP) > 8mmHg, global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI) > 680ml/m2 and resting inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter > 1.5cm.
5. Patients are in a relatively stable period of hemodynamics, as defined that the targe mean arterial pressure are maintained with the same dosage of vasopressors for at least 2 h.
6. Sinus rhythm with heart rate ≥ 95bpm maintain for at least 2 hours but less than 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who had received ivabradine therapy or known allergy to it prior to randomization.
2. Patients with severe liver dysfunction (Child-C grade).
3. Patients with a history of pre-existing chronic renal failure (glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2), except patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).
4. Patients with known seizure disorder.
5. Patients with any contraindication to gastrointestinal drug administration.
6. Pregnant or lactating patients.
7. patients requiring the use of potent cytochrome CYP3A4 inhibitors such as antifungals of the azole-type (specifically ketoconazole and itraconazole), macrolide antibiotics (specifically clarithromycin and erythromycin) and HIV protease inhibitors (specifically nelfinavir and ritonavir).
8. Patients with active bleeding;
9. Patients with cardiac dysfunction caused by non-septic causes such as recent (< 2months) acute myocardial infarction, chronic cardiac dysfunction (NYHA Class Ⅳ), congenital heart disease, pericardial tamponade, severe aortic regurgitation and aortic coarctation before enrollment.
10. Patients with sinoatrial block, sick sinus syndrome, atrioventricular block or heart rate dependence on pacemaker.
11. Patients with refractory shock, which may be considered if one of the following conditions still exists in spite of active volume resuscitation, high doses of vasoactive drugs (VIS score >120), and other regular therapy: 1) Worsening hypotension (MAP<65mmHg); 2) Lactate persistence>5mmol/L (two times in a row with an interval of more than 30min), and a progressive upward trend; 3) Mixed venous blood oxygen saturation (SvO2) sustained <55% (more than two consecutive times, more than 30min apart), and progressive deterioration. The above conditions lasted for more than 5 hours.
12. Use of beta blockers within 24 hours before enrollment.
13. Pheochromocytoma patients.
14. After cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
15. Patients who have been enrolled in another interventional clinical study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: standard treatment group; Standard treatment refers to that patients received active anti-infection and treatment of primary diseases according to the 2016 International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and septic shock. In addition, adequate volume resuscitation and vasoactive drug support can be given to maintain MAP≥65mmHg, and life support technologies such as ventilators and CRRT were given as needed. The target of heart rate control not mentioned in the above guidelines, was not mandatory for this group of patients with sinus tachycardia, so pharmacologic intervention was not administered.
Experimental: Ivabradine group; Standard treatment for sepsis plus enteral ivabradine.	Drug: Ivabradine; After randomization, the starting dose of ivabradine, 5mg, is given via the gastrointestinal tract every 12 hours. Heart rate control ranged from 70 to 94 bpm. Ivabradine was maintained until 96 hours after initiation of therapy. Beyond this period, the decision to continue ivabradine is left to the discretion of the treating intensivist. During the drug intervention period, heart rate is assessed before each dose. Ivabradine is tapered or discontinued if the heart rate is lower than the target rate; If the heart rate remains ≥95 bpm after 48 hours, the dose is increased to 7.5mg. If a heart rate of 95 or more bpm recurs after discontinuation during the intervention period, treatment with ivabradine can be resumed. Furthermore, Ivabradine is also discontinued at any time in the presence of severe liver impairment, malignant arrhythmia, cardiac conduction block, allergy, the need to take drugs with potentially harmful effects of ivabradine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The difference in MAP	MAP will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.	96 hours
The difference in CI	Cardiac index (CI) will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.	96 hours
The difference in LVEF	Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)，measured by bedside ultrasound, will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.	96 hours
The difference in SVI	Stroke volume index (SVI), obtained through PiCCO, will be recorded every 12 hours for each patient during the first 96 hours after enrollment. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.	96 hours
The difference of a reduction in heart rate	Heart rate is a continuous variable with repeated measurements during the first 96 hours after enrollment, the area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared.	96 hours
The difference in VIS	Vasopressor requirement during the trial observation (or intervention) period ought to be recorded as vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) according to the formula. The area under the curve (AUC) relative to baseline are calculated for each group, and then difference in AUC are compared. The change in this index will be used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ivabradine.	96 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
length of ICU stay	average length of ICU stay will be compared	28 days
length of in-hospital stay	average length of in-hospital stay will be compared	28 days
28-day overall mortality	Overall survival measured from randomization to death or day 28	28 days
difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score	Difference of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (0~24) at day 1, 2, 3, 4 between groups. Higher score means more illness. SOFA score include organ function measure, which can reflect the functional status of organs.	96 hours
The percentage of need for organ support	the percentage of receipt of CRRT, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. It can reflect the functional status of organs, especially renal and pulmonary.	28 days
Incidence of adverse events	The incidence of adverse events will be compared between the two groups	96 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
• Investigators: Study Director: Zhenhui Zhang, PhD, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 1, 2023
• Primary Completion (Estimated): December 31, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 11, 2023
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 20, 2023
• First Posted (Actual): May 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): January 29, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 26, 2024
• Last Verified: January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Infections; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Inflammation; Sepsis; Toxemia
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2022-LCYJ-YYDZX-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No