The Efficacy of SPSIPB on Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption in Patients Undergoing VATS

June 12, 2023 updated by: Oguz Gundogdu, Cumhuriyet University

The Efficacy of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) on Postoperative Pain and Total Analgesic Consumption in Patients Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)

The aim of this study is to investigate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of SPSIPB and its effect on opioid consumption in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There were two randomized groups: Group S (SPSIPB) (n=12), Group C (no block) (n=12). All patients had standard general anesthesia. Group S had serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) with 0.25% bupivacaine (total volume of 30 ml) at the end of the surgery. Group Control had only tramadol for postoperative pain. Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess postoperative pain on 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hour after the surgery. Total tramadol consumption was calculated using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sivas, Turkey, 58000
        • Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients older than 18 years of age who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under general anesthesia and were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II-III according to the ASA risk classification.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who did not give consent,
  • patients with coagulopathy,
  • patients with signs of infection at the block application site,
  • patients using anticoagulants,
  • patients with local anesthetic drug allergies,
  • patients undergoing open surgery,
  • patients with unstable hemodynamics,
  • patients who could not cooperate during postoperative pain assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SPSIPB
Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block is the intervention used in this study. It was performed when the patient is in lateral decubitis position. A high frequency (7-12 MHz) linear transducer of the ultrasound device is placed at the spinae scapula level in the transverse plane, and the upper medial border of the scapula, the trapezius muscle, rhomboid muscle, serratus posterior superior muscle (SPSM) and the second and third ribs are visualized. The sonovisible needle is then advanced immediately medial to the scapula, aiming for the area between the second and third ribs in order to reach the fascial plane between the SPSM and intercostal muscles. After contact of the needle with the rib gently, 1-2mL of saline is used to confirm the correct plane, and a total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered to the superficial to the intercostal muscle. PCA device was also performed to this group with the same protocol which was detailed in control arm.
Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block is the intervention used in this study. It was performed when the patient is in lateral decubitis position. A high frequency (7-12 MHz) linear transducer of the ultrasound device is placed at the spinae scapula level in the transverse plane, and the upper medial border of the scapula, the trapezius muscle, rhomboid muscle, serratus posterior superior muscle (SPSM) and the second and third ribs are visualized. The sonovisible needle is then advanced immediately medial to the scapula, aiming for the area between the second and third ribs in order to reach the fascial plane between the SPSM and intercostal muscles. After contact of the needle with the rib gently, 1-2mL of saline is used to confirm the correct plane, and a total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is administered to the superficial to the intercostal muscle.
No Intervention: Control
Control group patients were not subjected to any block or local infiltration anesthesia (local anesthetic administration around the incision). Their postoperative pain was relieved with tramadol (intravenous analgesic drug) administration by using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Patient-controlled analgesia was achieved with tramadol hydrochloride at a concentration of 4 mg per 1 ml with the PCA device. The PCA device was configured to administer the patients boluses of 10 mg tramadol hydrochloride with a lockout time of 20 minutes, allowing a maximum of 4 pushes per hour. The total dose was standardized for all patients with a maximum daily dose of 400 mg and a maximum dose of 100 mg tramadol hydrochloride every 6 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
Numerical rating scale is used for pain assessment. The scores of the numerical rating scale changes between 0 to 10 points. 10 points mean "the most severe pain that the patient ever had". 0 point means "there is no pain." Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Postoperative 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total tramadol consumption
Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours
Postoperative analgesic (tramadol) need is measured by using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.
Postoperative 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB)

3
Subscribe