Surgical Ward Innovation: Telemonitoring Controlled by Healthdot (SWITCH)

July 13, 2023 updated by: Friso Schonck, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

SWITCH- Surgical Ward Innovation: Telemonitoring Controlled by Healthdot Evaluation of Implementation

This observational clinical, single center trial is designed to evaluate the implementation of an already validated smart monitoring device, the Philips Healthdot, on one surgical ward at the Catharina hospital in Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

This study is performed during 6 months in which all patients admitted to one surgical ward will be enrolled. Implementation is established by a step-by-step approach in which the current manually performed spot check monitoring (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, heart rate, temperature and pain score), with the early warning score (EWS), is continued besides smart monitoring with the Healthdot (respiratory rate, heart rate and physical activity) during the first three months (phase 1). This phase aims at optimizing the infrastructure, education of hospital staff and practice with application/ activation and interpretation of the device. Upward of 4 months, Healthdot monitoring will be the primary monitoring method and spot check monitoring is only performed additionally in case of doubt about clinical condition or requirement of additional vital parameters.

Evaluation of the implementation will be performed with a focus group and various questionnaire regarding fidelity, acceptability, adoption, feasibility, appropriateness and costs. Thereby additional analysis regarding monitoring algorithms will be performed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This project is a 6 months monocenter prospective cohort study at the Catharina hospital in the Netherlands. Every patient admitted to the one surgery department will receive a Healthdot. Implementation of the Healthdot will be performed stepwise. During phase 1 (month 1-3, the pre-implementation phase), the current standard method of care with manual spot checks and EWS will be continued. During this phase Healthdots will be applied only for training purposes in preparation to the implementation phase, phase 2 (month 3-6). This phase consists of primarily Healthdot monitoring and manual spot checks only if indicated. After these 6 months, the implementation will be evaluated and optimized and potentially extended.

Participants:

The main research population for answering the research objectives are the nurses working at the specific surgical ward at the Catharina hospital.

In total amount of 500 patients, 250 during each phase, admitted to one surgical ward at the Catharina hospital will participate and receive a Healthdot as the new standard of care. These patients will sign informed consent for use of anonymized data. This population differs in age, gender, admission cause, admission duration and comorbidities but reflects the demographics of the general population on this ward which is essential to investigate implementation and prevent selection bias.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Simon Nienhuijs
  • Phone Number: 003140 239 9111

Study Locations

    • Noord-Brabant
      • Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The main research population for answering the research objectives are the nurses and physicians working at the specific surgical ward at the Catharina hospital. In total around 500 adult patients, 250 during each phase, admitted to one surgical ward at the Catharina hospital will participate and receive a Healthdot. These patients will sign informed consent for use of anonymized data. This population differs in age, gender, admission cause, admission duration and comorbidities.

Description

Nurses and physicians form the primary research population.

- Nurses and physicians, participating in het focus group will sign informed consent.

Patients won't be included for participation since the Healthdot will be the new standard of care regarding monitoring. Patients will however sign informed consent at admission for use of anonymized data.

Inclusion Criteria:

Nurses

  • Registered in the national register of medical professions (Big register)
  • Appointed as a nurse at the Catharina hospital and working at the surgical department during the study period
  • Willingness to participate in the core group for evaluation of the implementation

Physicians

  • Registered in the national register of medical professions (Big register)
  • Appointed at the Catharina hospital as a physician or resident during the study period.
  • Willingness to participate in the core group for evaluation of the implementation

Exclusion Criteria:

Nurses & Physicians

  • Termination of employment within the study period
  • No voluntarily participation in the core group evaluation meetings

Contra-indications for applying Healthdot

  • Known to have severe allergy for the tissue adhesive used in the Healthdot.
  • Any skin condition, for example prior severe rash, discoloration, scars or open wounds at the area of application
  • Pregnant, or breastfeeding
  • Use of topicals that are known to irritate the skin at the application area (such as medical and non-medical creams or lotions)
  • Patient with active implantable device such as a Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker
  • Unable to understand instructions
  • Left lower rib (place where Healthdot will be applied) is involved in the area of surgery, area of disinfection or area where bandages are needed.
  • Transfer to a different ward during hospitalization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the implementation of a continuous monitoring method on the surgical ward
Time Frame: Conducted on a daily base during the entire study, month 1-6
Workload: the experienced workload for nursing staff during the implementation of the Healthdot measured with the IWS and during focus group analysis
Conducted on a daily base during the entire study, month 1-6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adoption
Time Frame: 3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6
The intention and attitude towards the use of the Healthdot monitoring method. Measured with evidence-based practise attitude scale (EBPAS)
3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6
Feasibility of the Healthdot
Time Frame: 3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6
The extent to which the Healthdot monitoring method can be successfully carried out by the healthcare employees. Measured with a thematic analysis and input from the core group (Braun and Clark)
3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6
Acceptability
Time Frame: Evaluated at month 4 and 6
The additional effort regarding the amount of spot checks per hospital admission day per patient. Calculated with data from the electronic patient file records
Evaluated at month 4 and 6
Appropriateness
Time Frame: Evaluated after at month 4 and 6
Relation between device false alarms (noise) and correct alarms based on the alarming protocol. Measured as signal to noise ratio (SNR)
Evaluated after at month 4 and 6
Usability
Time Frame: Evaluated after at month 4 and 6
Number of unexpected events that occur during or result from the use of the Healthdot medical device. Measured as adverse device events (ADE)
Evaluated after at month 4 and 6
Feasibility and effectiveness
Time Frame: Manual time measurement during month 1-6, 2 times a week at different days
The amount of time needed to perform and process a complete manual spot check or digital monitoring check. Measured by manual time measurement
Manual time measurement during month 1-6, 2 times a week at different days
Costs
Time Frame: After completing of the study at 6 months
Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the duration of admission, the associated admission costs and the monitoring method. Calculation based on provided care and associated costs
After completing of the study at 6 months
Algorithm improvement
Time Frame: After completing of the study at 6 months
Advanced algorithm analyses for improved monitoring protocols with use of artificial intelligence (AI)
After completing of the study at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Friso Schonck, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • nWMO-2022.061

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Monitoring

3
Subscribe