Lead Migration During the Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Period and Therapeutic Response

July 13, 2023 updated by: Stephanie Jones, Augusta University

Contrasting Lead Migration During Spinal Stimulation Trial Period Against Therapeutic Response - Evaluating Securement Methods During the Trial Period

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare lead migration distance and therapeutic response for participants receiving a spinal cord stimulator during the trial period. Of note- scs trial period is a procedure name, not to be confused with this clinical trial study.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Is there a difference in migration distance and/or rate for those with external leads secured by an anchor device versus and anchor device with suture?
  • How does participant activity levels during the trial period compare to migration rates? ° Does the temperature, heat index, and humidity during the trial period impact migration rates? Participants will come in for the scs trial procedure as normal. They will be asked to complete an activity survey upon return to the clinic for lead pull after the scs trial. They will also have an additional image upon return to the clinic to document lead position prior to lead pull.

Researchers will compare two groups- those with securement via anchor and those with securement via anchor and suture to see if there is an impact on therapeutic effect (percentage of pain relief) form the scs trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Recruiting
        • Augusta University Health System Pain Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults ages 18 and over without a failed spinal stimulation trial or implant will be accepted into the study. Patients must have a diagnosis of chronic back pain and must be patients of the identified anesthesiologists and have their procedures performed at AUHS pain clinic.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they have a history of local anesthetic allergy (lidocaine), current skin infections at the procedure site, or a diagnosis of diaphoresis/ secondary hyperhidrosis (chronic over sweating).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Therapeutic Response
Time Frame: SCS trial periods are 3-6 days at our facilty.
% of pain relief achieved by the participant during the SCS trial period
SCS trial periods are 3-6 days at our facilty.
Lead position changes (migration)
Time Frame: the last day of the trial period which could be day 3 up to day 6, depending on length
final location of the SCS leads at the end of the scs trial period, as seen on imaging
the last day of the trial period which could be day 3 up to day 6, depending on length

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jeane Silva, PhD, Augusta University
  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie C Jones, Grad Student, Augusta University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 14, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 14, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1994689

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on external securement of scs leads during the scs trial period

3
Subscribe