Use of Indocyanine Green in Robotic Prostate Surgeries

July 21, 2023 updated by: Araz Musaev, Ankara University

Evaluation of the Effect of Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Use on Erectile Function and Surgical Margin Positivity in Patients Undergoing Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Imaging of the vascular nerve bundle using Indocyanine Green

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Comparison of erectile function and surgical margin positivity after nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy surgery performed by imaging the vascular nerve bundle using Indocyanine Green with the results after nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy surgery without Indocyanine Green

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients high risk prostate cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group using Indocyanine Green
Performing nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by IV injecting of Indocyanine Green
Drug: using Indocyanine Green
Nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using Indocyanine Green
Other Names:
  • IV Indocyanine Green injection
Experimental: The Indocyanine Green -unused group
Nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without the use of Indocyanine Green
Procedure: Nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without the use of Indocyanine Green

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of erectile function.
Time Frame: up to 12 months

Evaluation of erectile function after Nerve Sparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with and without the application of Indocyanine Green.Evaluation of surgical margin positivity after Nerve Sparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with and without the application of Indocyanine Green.

Both groups will evaluate their erectile function by completing the preoperative International Index of Erectile Function Every groups of participants will fill the International Index of Erectile Function -5 again after surgery in 3. -6. -9. -12 months.

The possible scores for the International Index of Erectile Function- 5 range from 0 to 30, and Erectile disfonction is classified into five categories based on the scores: severe (0-10), moderate (11-16), mild to moderate (17-21), mild (22-25), and no erectile disfonction (26-30).
up to 12 months
Evaluation of surgical margin positivity
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Postoperative surgical margin positivity will be compared in both groups according to the results of the postoperative pathology report. Surgical margin positivity in both groups will be evaluated as a percentage and it will be evaluated whether there is a significant difference between the two groups
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Ankara University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Araz Musaev, Ankara Universitry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A01062021Z

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

Clinical Trials on using Indocyanine Green

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in South Africa

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe