- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06017037
REward Processing And Citalopram Study (REPAC)
The goal of this experimental medicine study is to examine the effect of increasing serotonin on reward processing in healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does a subacute increase in serotonin influence the activation regions during reward learning
- Does a subacute increase in serotonin influence behavioural markers of reward valuation (effort task), responsiveness (taste task) and learning (learning task)
Participants will be:
given a 7-day course of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, citalopram. undergo behavioural testing complete a reward learning task whilst undergoing fMRI
Researchers will compare results against a placebo group.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Alexander Smith, MBBS
- Phone Number: 07865 618318
- Email: alexander.smith@psych.ox.ac.uk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Susannah Murphy, PhD
- Email: susannah.murphy@psych.ox.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
Oxfordshire
-
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 7JX
- Recruiting
- Neurosciences building, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford hospital
-
Contact:
- Alexander Smith
- Phone Number: 01865618339
- Email: Alexander.Smith@psych.ox.ac.uk
-
Contact:
- Catherine harmer
- Email: catherine.harmer@psych.ox.ac.uk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the research
- Aged between 18 to 65 years
- Sufficient knowledge of English language to understand and complete study tasks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current or past probable diagnosis of psychiatric illness, according to DSM-5 criteria, requiring intervention by a healthcare professional, including but not limited to psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depression, OCD, PTSD, substance abuse disorder or any eating disorder
- Current or past diagnosis of any significant personality disorder (e.g. borderline personality disorder) according to self-report
- Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactive disorder or autistic spectrum disorder that impairs daily functioning, requires pharmacotherapy or in the opinion of the study medic would affect the scientific integrity of the study
- Current use of medication that might interact with the effects of citalopram or affect the scientific integrity of the study
- Previous suicide attempt or previous prolonged period (e.g. > 5 days) of thoughts to end life
- Known contraindication to citalopram including: past allergic reaction to citalopram or any other medicines, diagnosis of a cardiovascular condition, glaucoma, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, diagnosis of epilepsy, previous diagnosis of angle-closure glaucoma, or current use of any other medication whose use interacts with citalopram (according to BNF guidance) e.g. associated with prolonged QT-interval
- Any other current or past medical conditions which in the opinion of the study medic may interfere with the safety of the participant or the scientific integrity of the study including epilepsy/seizures, brain injury, hepatic or renal disease, diabetes, severe gastro-intestinal problems, Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours, neurological conditions
- First-degree relative with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or other psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder
- Severely underweight (BMI<17) or very obese (BMI>40) in a manner that renders them unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the study medic
- Heavy use of cigarettes (smoke > 20 cigarettes per day)
- Heavy use of caffeine (drink > 4 250ml cups/cans of coffee/energy drinks per day)
- Lactose intolerance (due to the study involving administration of a lactose placebo tablet)
- Known allergy to citric acid, sodium chloride, sucrose or quinine
- Pregnancy (as determined by urine pregnancy test taken during the Part 2 screening visit), breast feeding or plans to become pregnant
- past history of dependence on illicit substances or regular illicit substance use within previous three months
- Evidence of current or past harmful use of alcohol
- previous participation in a study involving the tasks used in this study or involving use of citalopram in the last year
- physical (including visual and auditory) or language impairment that would make complying with the study protocol challenging
- ongoing deficit in sense of smell or taste e.g. following Covid-19 infection
- Participant is unlikely to comply with the clinical study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason, in the opinion of the Investigator
- Not suitable for MRI neuroimaging e.g. claustrophobia, difficulty remaining still for duration of scan
- Any MRI contraindications outlined in FMRIB 3 Tesla scanning safety form
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Citalopram
Citalopram 20mg p.o. once daily for 7-9 days
|
Citalopram 20mg tablets, encapsulated to aid blinding.
To take per oral once daily for 7-9 days
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Lactose p.o. once daily for 7-9 days
|
Lactose monohydrate tablets encapsulated to aid blinding.
To take per oral once daily for 7-9 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reward & aversive learning: behavioural correlates
Time Frame: Day 7-9 of treatment
|
Optimal choice learning rate of conditioned stimuli to win and loss outcomes. During an instrumental reinforcement learning task participant will complete trials with a pair of symbols (the valence will either be loss or win, which is implicit). One symbol will be high chance of that outcome (either win or loss depending on the valence of the pair) and the other low chance of the outcome. In the win pair the optimal choice is the high chance symbol (i.e. to win), in the loss pair the optimal choice is the low chance option (i.e. avoid loss). In each allocation group the proportion of participants making an optimal choice will be calculated on a trial-by-trial basis. This provide the learning rate outcome. |
Day 7-9 of treatment
|
Reward & aversive learning: neural correlates
Time Frame: Day 7-9 of treatment
|
Activity of a network of brain regions associated with reward learning (during anticipation and outcome), in response to a positive & negative outcomes in reward learning task. This will be the difference in BOLD activation in certain brain regions (pertinent to reward processing) between allocation groups during the anticipation stage and the outcome stage of the instrumental learning task. |
Day 7-9 of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Resting state
Time Frame: Day 7-9 of treatment
|
Resting state fMRI activation
|
Day 7-9 of treatment
|
Subjective rating of primary reward
Time Frame: Day 0 and day 7-9 of treatment
|
Subjective rating of four tastes (sweet, salt, sour & bitter) in terms of intensity, anticipation of pleasurableness and actual pleasurableness.
|
Day 0 and day 7-9 of treatment
|
Reward & aversive learning: behavioural volatile reward learning task: total money won
Time Frame: day 7-9 of treatment
|
Amount of money won/lost & total amount of money received.
|
day 7-9 of treatment
|
Motivational reward task
Time Frame: day 7-9 of treatment
|
Participants are asked to accept or decline hypothetical offers made of various combinations of reward and physical effort (grip strength). For a limited number of offers participants are asked to actually expend effort for offers too. The investigators will examine
|
day 7-9 of treatment
|
Reward & aversive learning: behavioural volatile reward learning task: learning rate
Time Frame: day 7-9 of treatment
|
Learning rate of optimal choices changes during the task. Proportion of participants in each allocation arm making an optimal choice on a trial-by-trial basis will provide the learning rate for each group. Provides sensitive measure of reward and aversive learning rates. |
day 7-9 of treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Catherine Harmer, PhD, University of Oxford
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Anhedonia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Serotonin Agents
- Antidepressive Agents
- Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
- Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
- Citalopram
Other Study ID Numbers
- REPAC01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Research data will be anonymised and then processed for analysis. Anonymised data will be made available post-publication on Open Science Framework (OSF).
defaced neural images will be shared via governed access through Zenodo with data sharing agreements in place
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anhedonia
-
CEN BiotechCEN Nutriment; Biovet Conseil; Amadeite SASCompletedAnhedonia in Healthy Volunteers
-
Maastricht UniversityAristotle University Of Thessaloniki; P1vital Products LTD.; Biotrial; University... and other collaboratorsCompletedDepression | Schizophrenia | Motivation | Anhedonia, Physical | Anhedonia, Social | Negative Symptoms With Primary Psychotic DisorderGermany, Greece, Netherlands, Spain
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Duke UniversityCompletedAnhedoniaUnited States
-
University of ManitobaEnrolling by invitation
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Jiangsu Province Nanjing Brain HospitalRecruiting
-
University of New MexicoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Duke UniversityCompletedAnhedoniaUnited States
-
University of OxfordCompleted
Clinical Trials on Citalopram 20mg
-
Onconic Therapeutics Inc.CompletedHealthyKorea, Republic of
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...TerminatedFunctional Chest PainNetherlands
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Active, not recruitingParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUnknown
-
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalCompletedMajor Depressive DisorderCanada
-
University of IowaMayo Clinic; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); University of Rochester and other collaboratorsCompletedHuntington Disease | Chorea | Executive DysfunctionUnited States
-
Anji PharmaCovanceCompletedFunctional ConstipationChina, United States
-
South China Center For Innovative PharmaceuticalsXiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityCompleted
-
Medicines for Malaria VentureQ-Pharm Pty LimitedTerminatedMalaria, FalciparumAustralia