LAA Clipping Versus NOACs to Prevent Stroke in Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Epicardial Left Atrial Appendage Clipping Versus Novel Oral Anticoagulants to Reduce Stroke Risk in Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

This trial is designed to examine the hypothesis that thoracoscopic LAA clipping is superior to NOACs for stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, major bleeding events and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events in AF patients at high risk of embolism (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) that are not undergoing ablation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia disease, and the incidence of AF increases markedly with age and approximately doubles with each decade. According to the previous study, the incidence of stroke were five times in patients with AF than those in the general population. Systemic oral anticoagulant is a well-established, guideline-recommended therapy for the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF at high risk of embolism (CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2 in men and ≥3 in women), and the guidelines recommend that the novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) be preferred (Class I, Level of evidence A). However, a significant proportion of patients with nonvalvular AF have difficulties in long-term oral anticoagulant therapy, due to medication adherence and contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Also, several randomized controlled trials indicated that bleeding risk remained high with novel oral anticoagulants. Therefore, it is essential to explore alternative treatment strategies for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF.

It has been reported that the left atrial appendage (LAA) is suspected as a vital source of cerebral emboli and may lead to ischemic stroke, removal or closure of the LAA may be an alternative to oral anticoagulants. Various surgical or interventional approaches have been developed to close or occlude LAA to prevent stroke in AF patients, such as percutaneous LAA occlusion, suture ligation, and surgical excision. However, these techniques suffer from incomplete LAA closure or the presence of residual blood flow, which can lead to thrombosis and stroke. Thoracoscopic LAA clip, on the other hand, cloud block blood flow between the LAA and the left atrium (LA), achieving isolation of LAA and preventing thrombi and strokes. A previous study has demonstrated a high 95% success rate of LAA clipping without operation-related complications, and freedom from stroke was 99.1% at a median follow-up of 20 months. Therefore, LAA clipping is an effective and durable method in stroke prevention. However, currently high-quality RCTs are lacking to support the superiority of LAA clipping compared with NOACs in terms of stroke prevention and safety. In this trial, the investigators designed a multicenter prospective RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic LAA clipping and NOACs in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

290

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhe Zheng, M.D., Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chunyu Yu, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Haojie Li, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chuxiang Lei, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Persistent or long-standing persistent AF documented by medical history or direct electrocardiogram.
  • CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 in men and ≥3 in women.
  • Agree to perform thoracoscopic LAA occlusion procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With electrical cardioversion or ablation intent.
  • Other heart diseases with surgical indications.
  • Ischemic stroke and other cardiac embolic events within 30 days.
  • Major clinical bleeding event within 30 days.
  • Contraindications to anticoagulation.
  • Intracardiac thrombus.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%.
  • Active systemic infection or infective endocarditis or pericarditis
  • Severe liver disease (acute clinical hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis) or alanine transaminase (ALT)/ aspartate transaminase (AST) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal value.
  • Severe renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤ 30mL/min).
  • Other diseases requiring oral anticoagulants.
  • Active aortic plaque.
  • Acute coronary syndrome within 3 months.
  • Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
  • Patients requiring dual antiplatelet drug therapy.
  • Previous cardiac and left lung surgery.
  • Severe left pleural and pericardial adhesions.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Metal allergies.
  • Terminal illness with a life expectancy of less than 2 years.
  • Participation in other clinical studies at the time of enrollment.
  • Refuse to participate in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LAA clipping group
In this arm, participants are performed thoracoscopic LAA clipping.
The surgeons measured the length of the base of the LAA, an appropriately sized LAA clip is then inserted with the aid of a thoracoscope and placed parallel to the base of the LAA.
Active Comparator: NOACs group
Patients randomized to NOAC therapy will begin long-term oral administration of NOACs immediately after enrollment.
For patients with creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min, oral rivaroxaban 20 mg daily was administered, whereas for patients with creatinine clearance between 30-49 ml/min, oral rivaroxaban 15 mg daily was administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of composite endpoint
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, major bleeding event, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event.
At 24-month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of stroke
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Acute episodes of focal or global neurological dysfunction due to cerebral, spinal cord or retinal vascular injury from haemorrhage or infarction. Symptoms or signs must have lasted ≥ 24 hours, or symptoms/signs may have lasted less than 24 hours if demonstrated by CT, MRI, or autopsy.
At 24-month after intervention
Rate of systemic embolism
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Confirmed by imaging or angiography
At 24-month after intervention
Rate of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Deaths from all causes
At 24-month after intervention
Rate of major bleeding event
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
  1. fatal haemorrhage, and/or
  2. Symptomatic haemorrhage in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intravertebral, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or intrapericardial, or intramuscular haemorrhage leading to osteofascial compartment syndrome, and/or 3. haemorrhage that results in a fall in haemoglobin level of 2.0 g/dL or more, or that results in the importation of two or more units of whole blood or red blood cells.
At 24-month after intervention
Rate of clinically relevant non-major bleeding event
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Bleeding events that do not meet the criteria for an ISTH major bleeding event but requires hospitalisation or a change in antithrombotic treatment strategy or requires invasive management.
At 24-month after intervention
Rate of surgery-related complications
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Incidence of in-hospital death, in-hospital stroke, intermediate small-incision open thoracotomy or median open thoracotomy, and postoperative re-intervention due to hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and pyothorax.
At 24-month after intervention
Rate of minor bleeding events
Time Frame: At 24-month after intervention
Bleeding events that do not meet the ISTH criteria for a major bleeding event, do not meet the criteria for a clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, and do not require the subject to seek additional assistance from medical care.
At 24-month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD, Fuwai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Thoracoscopic LAA clipping

3
Subscribe