COMPLEX Registry - A Prospective COhort Study to Describe the Management and Outcomes of Patients Presenting With compLEX and Calcified Coronary Artery Disease (COMPLEX)

October 4, 2023 updated by: Matthias Bossard, Luzerner Kantonsspital
The purpose of the COMPLEX Registry is to prospectively and retrospectively collect baseline, clinical and procedural data of patients who have undergone PCI or CABG for complex and/ or calcified chronic CAD, irrespective of clinical presentation as well as to prospectively collect data about their clinical outcomes. The outcomes will be compared in different clinical subgroups (e.g. PCI vs. CABG). The impact of current PCI techniques/ devices, but also CABG strategies in different clinical settings and coronary artery lesions on cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

a. PCI cohort - Periprocedural outcomes/ complications to be analyzed represent: final result (e.g. TIMI flow), stent expansion, dissections, perforations, and prevalence of thrombus (assessed by angiography and intravascular imaging) b. CABG cohort - Periprocedural outcomes/ complications to be analyzed include: final result (e.g. graft flow), number and type of grafts, total length of surgery, bypass time, cross-clamp time, median chest-tube output (mL), bleeding, duration of CCU/ ICU stay, re-operation.

c. For the PCI, CABG as well as medically managed cohort, short and long-term clinical outcomes of interest include: unstable angina (UA), stent-/scaffold thrombosis, target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel revascularization (TVR), ischemia driven revascularization, repeat hospitalization, new/worsening heart failure, cardiogenic shock, stroke, bleedings, cardiovascular death and all-cause death.

2. PCI cohort:

  1. To describe procedural and clinical performance of various PCI devices including high pressure balloons, scoring, balloons, cutting balloons, rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, stent and scaffold devices implanted in patients presenting with complex and calcified chronic CAD
  2. To study the impact of different PCI devices and revascularization strategies used for lesion preparation and PCI optimization strategies among patients undergoing PCI
  3. To describe early and late angiographic and OCT-findings among complex and calcified coronary artery disease patients treated with various metallic stent and scaffold devices
  4. To assess possible predictors for coronary stent implantation or device failure 3. CABG cohort:

a. To describe procedural and clinical performance of various surgical techniques b. To assess outcomes across various surgical cohorts (e.g. urgent vs. elective, diabetic vs. non-diabetic, gender disparities) c. To investigate various CABG revascularization strategies (e.g. off- versus on-pump, "Fully arterial", minimal invasive approach) and their impact on short and long-term outcomes d. To describe perioperative recovery and risk for in-hospital complications (e.g. wound infections, pneumonia) e. To assess possible predictors for graft failure with contemporary surgical techniques 4. Conservative - only medically treated - cohort:

  1. To describe medical management (drugs regimens) as well as other lifestyle interventions in patients presenting with complex and calcified chronic CAD who are being treated with a primarily conservative (non-invasive) strategy.
  2. To study the clinical impact of different treatment strategies/ medical regimens used among chronic, complex CAD, which are being managed solely with medical therapy.
  3. To assess possible predictors for management failure (e.g. recurrence of symptoms or impaired quality of life).

    5. To compare presentation, (medical) management, short- and long-term outcomes across the different treatment cohorts (PCI, CABG and medically managed cohort).

    6. To specifically describe age- and gender-specific disparities across the various treatment regimens (e.g. PCI versus CABG).

    7. To evaluate the impact of different antithrombotic regimens on patient's clinical outcomes 8. To study procedural and clinical outcomes among CAD patients requiring hemodynamic support using mechanical devices.

    9. To analyze the performance of various non-invasive testing modalities (e.g. laboratory/ ECG parameters, treadmill-test, stress-echocardiography, CMR, SPECT or PET-CT) in order to predict outcomes of patients with chronic, complex CAD.

    10. To describe economic implications (cost-effectiveness) of various interventional treatments for CAD.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

In an all-comers design, virtually any CAD patient with complex and/ or calcified coronary artery disease treated with PCI or CABG at the Heart Center of the Luzerner Kantonsspital (LUKS) and giving consent may be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject >18 years of age
  • Individuals presenting with chronic, complex and/or calcified CAD and requiring PCI or CABG
  • Complex coronary artery disease / lesions must include at least one of the following attributes:
  • Long and/ or heavily calcified coronary lesions
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Chronic total occlusions (CTO)
  • Left main lesions
  • Bifurcation lesions
  • Bypass graft lesions
  • Small vessel disease / coronary microvascular dysfunction (e.g. not amenable to PCI)
  • Subjects must be willing to sign a patient informed consent (PIC) or must have signed the General Consent (GK).

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the patient.

  • Patient is <18 years of age
  • Patient unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • Patients with no complex and calcified CAD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Treatment
The project ́s main goal is to collect baseline, clinical and procedural data as well as to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with complex coronary lesions treated with current PCI techniques/ devices, but also CABG strategies in different clinical settings.
To evaluate the impact of current PCI techniques/devices, but also CABG strategies, in patients with complex coronary artery lesions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of combination of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of acute vessel closure
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of target lesion failure (TLF)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of ischemia driven TLR
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of new AMI (NSTEMI/STEMI)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of TIA or stroke
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of bleeding events (access site or non-access site related) according to the BARC classification.
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
Rate of vascular complications (according to VARC criteria)
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years
1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Florim Cuculi, MD, Luzerner Kantonsspital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

October 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Impact of current PCI techniques/ devices in complex coronary artery lesions

3
Subscribe