Comparison Between Different Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Techniques

December 10, 2023 updated by: Sara elmaghraby, Mansoura University

Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Decompression Technique Versus Ridge Splitting in Atrophic Posterior Mandibular Ridge With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Sixteen patients were selected from the Outpatient Clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for replacement of missed single tooth / teeth in posterior atrophic mandible by dental implant.

Patients' grouping:

Patients were divided randomly into two equal uniform groups as follow:

Group I:

Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

Group II:

Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.

All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at regular time interval immediately, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt
        • Sara Elmagraby

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's cooperation, motivation and good oral hygiene.
  • Patient medically free from systemic diseases that absolutely contraindicate implant surgery.
  • Moderately atrophic posterior mandible (horizontal alveolar dimension is not more than 4 mm at the crest), with minimum 10 mm vertical height.
  • Patients prepared to comply with the follow-up and maintenance programme.
  • Free from history of bruxism / parafunctional habits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with local pathological disease such as cyst, tumor at the planned surgical site.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Heavy smoker patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group 1
Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.
Instead of a cover screw, a 2-mm healing abutment was used after implant insertion
Experimental: group 2
Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.
horizontal ridge augmentation was done using piezosurgery tips and bone expanders

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alveolar ridge width
Time Frame: 12 months

The ridge width was measured on the cross section view at different time interval from the outer surface of the buccal bone to the outer surface of the lingual bone perpendicular to the line marking the long axis of the implant at implant platform.

Changes in alveolar ridge width was measured by subtracting ridge width value after 6 and 12 months from immediate postoperative.

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 26, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A03030821

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrophic Ridge

Clinical Trials on horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

3
Subscribe