Effectiveness of High-intensity Aerobic Interval Training on Impairments and Activity Limitations in the Acute Phase of Stroke in Benin

December 20, 2023 updated by: Dominique Hansen, Hasselt University

Is High-intensity Aerobic Interval Training Appropriate for Recovering Impairments and Activity Limitations in the Acute Phase of Stroke? A Randomized Controlled Trial in Benin

This clinical trial aims to examine the effects of combining HIIT on a semi-recumbent cycle ergometer (HIIT-RCE) with conventional physiotherapy on impairments and activity limitations in early subacute stroke. We hypothesized that HIIT combined with conventional physiotherapy would be more effective than conventional physiotherapy in improving workload capacity.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Parakou, Benin
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Parakou
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elogni R Amanzonwé, MSc.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Oyene R Kossi, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

People with the diagnosis of stroke were screened and recruited within the first-month after the stroke onset according to the following criteria

  1. first episode from an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by CT scan;
  2. muscle strength of the affected leg defined by Motricity Index between 14 and 19, i.e., between 2 and 4 on the Medical Research Council scale;
  3. modified Ashworth score of 0 or 1, indicating no spasticity or slight spasticity over the affected lower limb, respectively
  4. able to walk at least 5 meters independently with or without assistive devices and understand simple instructions;
  5. resident in Parakou or its surroundings
  6. wish to participate in the hospital program

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients whose medical records reported

  1. uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia), heart failure, or recent myocardial infarction, arteriopathy,
  2. primary orthopedic conditions (e.g., fractures, active rheumatoid arthritis),
  3. other neurological diseases (such as Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease), (4) patients unable to perform a graded exercise test, i.e., unable to reach the target cadence of 50 rpm or exercise-induced asthma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HIIT-RCE
All participants will receive conventional physiotherapy for half an hour thrice weekly for six weeks. Conventional physiotherapy will be followed by a 15 min rest period, then the HIIT on a semi-recumbent cycle SOLE R92 (HIIT-RCE) will be performed.Each HIIT-RCE session will be preceded by 3-min of unloaded cycling as a warm-up and ended with 3-min of stretching. The HIIT-RCE procedure will start at 4-min at 30% of the peak workload interspersed with 1-min at 70% of the peak workload for weeks 1-2 (4 repetitions for 20 min) and increased by approximately 5 minutes every two weeks as tolerated to reach 30 minutes from week 5 (6 repetitions). The training intensity will progress similarly by 5% peak work rate two weeks as tolerated to reach 4-min at 40% peak workload interspersed with 1-min 80% peak workload from week-5. The cycle frequency will be at least 50 rpm.
High-intensity interval training on semi-recumbent cycle ergometer
Active Comparator: Conventional physiotherapy
The group will receive conventional physiotherapy that will consist primarily of passive movement, stretching, balance training, strengthening, and lower intensity overground walking for 30 minutes. This will be followed by a 15-minute rest period. Then an unloaded cycling session on a semi-recumbent cycle ergometer with preferred cadence until to get equal energy expenditure per session between groups by case-matching.
Conventional physiotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Workload capacity
Time Frame: At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
A progressive intensity maximal effort cycling test will be performed in a semi-recumbent ergometer cycle (SOLE R90) to determine each participant's peak workload (in watts).
At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS),
Time Frame: At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The BBS will be used to assess balance impairment. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 56. A score of 56 indicates functional balance and a score < 45 indicates a higher risk of falling.
At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT)
Time Frame: At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The 6MWT is a measure of walking endurance. 35,36 It assesses the distance a participant can walk as fast as possible for 6 min on a 30 m straight line with the option to stop for fatigue at any point.
At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The 10-meter Walk Test (10mWT)
Time Frame: At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The 10mWT is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in meters per second over the middle 10 meters of a 14-meter course.
At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The 5-Repetition Sit-To-Stand test (5R-STS)
Time Frame: At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The 5R-STS test measures the time to complete five repetitions of the sit-to-stand maneuver. Participants unable to complete five repetitions within 1-min will be given a score of 60 s.
At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after intervention
The EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months(T3) after intervention
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessed, health-related, quality of life questionnaire validated for acute stroke. It has 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) of 5 items each, and scores range from 0 (best quality of life) to 1 (worst quality of life).
At enrolment (T0), After 6 weeks of intervention (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months(T3) after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominique R Hansen, PhD, Hasselt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available to researchers upon request to the first author (ERA)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute

Clinical Trials on HIIT-RCE

3
Subscribe