Comfort of Patients Under Non Invasive Ventilation According to the Mask (ComPaNIV)

January 8, 2024 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Comparison of the Comfort of Patients Under Non-invasive Ventilation According to the Use of a Sub Nasal Mask Versus an Oronasal Mask

A sub-nasal mask with a skirt that fits the nostrils and with a dedicated port for the nasogastric tube has recently been introduced. This interface has never been compared to nasal-oral masks. We hypothesise that such a sub-nasal mask increases comfort compared to a conventional naso-oral mask. The primary objective is to compare the comfort of the sub-nasal mask with that of a standard naso-oral mask.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a first-line treatment for many conditions encountered in the ICU. This technique requires training of heath professionals, appropriate equipment, optimisation of ventilator settings and good cooperation from the patient. Indeed, NIV failures lead ton invasive mechanical ventilation, thus increasing morbidity and mortality. These failures are favoured by the patient's poor tolerance to NIV. The success of the treatment depends greatly on the patient's compliance and comfort. The choice of the mask is therefore essential. There are different types of interface, such as the full-face helmet, the face mask, the nasal-oral mask or the nasal mask. The nasal-oral mask rmains the most commonly used interface. Recommendations emphasise the importance of choosing a mask that is the right size and best tolerated by the patient. Despite benefits of NIV, there are a number of potential complications: skin lesions at pressure points, particulaly at the nasal bridge, gastric distension, barotrauma, haemodynamic effects of positive presure ventilation, claustrophobia, anxiety, difficulty in speaking and eating, dry eyes, patient-ventilator asynchrony. Some of these complications depend on the type of mask used. a sub-nasal mask with a skirt that fits the nostrils and a dedicated port for the nasogastric tube has recently been introduced. To our knowledge, this interface has never been compared to commercially avaible nasal-oral masks.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor - Réanimation/ Unité de Surveillance Continue
        • Contact:
          • Armand Mekontso Dessap, MD
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270
        • CHU Bicêtre - Unité de Soins Intensifs Pneumologique
        • Contact:
      • le Kremlin Bicetre, France, 94270

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients hospitalized in intensive care, continuous monitoring unit or pulmonary intensive care with an indication for NIV.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Indication of NIV, carried out by the physicians in charge of the patient, among the following:

  • COPD exacerbation
  • Hydrostatic acute pulmonary edema
  • Acute Chest Syndrome with Hypercapnia in Sickle Cell Patients
  • Post-extubation, planned in a patient at risk or recovering from extubation failure
  • Hypoventilation-obesity syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

Formal contraindication to NIV among:

  • Indication for orotracheal intubation at the outset
  • Non-cooperative, agitated, opponent of the technique
  • Coma
  • Respiratory exhaustion
  • Shock, severe ventricular arrhythmias, immediate aftermath of cardiac arrest
  • Undrained pneumothorax, blowing chest wound
  • Upper airway obstruction (except sleep apnea, laryngotracheomalacia)
  • Uncontrollable vomiting
  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Measure of protection of justice
  • Facial deformity
  • Dying or palliative care patient
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1 to 10 self assessment scale
Time Frame: throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
Comfort will be assessed by a numerical self-assessment scale from 0 to 10.
throughout the study (an average of 10 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of subjects who prefer one type of mask over the other
Time Frame: throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
Percentage of leakage volume compared to the tidal leakage volume
Time Frame: throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
Dyspnea
Time Frame: throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
Number of interventions on mask position by nurses during NIV session
Time Frame: throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
Number of side effects
Time Frame: throughout the study (an average of 10 months)
throughout the study (an average of 10 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe CARPENTIER, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD Exacerbation

Clinical Trials on mask

3
Subscribe